Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6322 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.117 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 21734/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.01.2021 IN WP(C)
21734/2020(N) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/10TH RESPONDENT:
JUSTUS P.J.,
AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH,
PUTHANPURAKKAL HOUSE, PUDURUTHY P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 623.
BY ADV. SMT. PRABISHA T.P.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 9:
1 JOSHY E.K.,
S/O.KOCHUVARKEY MASTER, AGED 47 YEARS,
EMMATTY HOUSE, PUDURUTHY P.O., THRISSUR
DISTRICT, PIN-680 623.
2 WADAKANCHERY MUNICIPALITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, WADAKANCHERY
MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERY P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 582.
3 SECRETARY, WADAKANCHERY MUNICIPALITY,
WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 582.
4 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR-680 003.
5 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE RDO, AYYANTHOLE P.O.,
THRISSUR-680 003.
6 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/STATION HOUSE
OFFICER, WADAKANCHERY POLICE STATION,
WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 582.
7 TAHSILDAR,
TALAPPILLY TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERY
R.P. No.117 of 2021
in
W.P.(C) No.21734 of 2020
2
P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 582.
8 HEALTH INSPECTOR,
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, WADAKANCHERY,
KUMARANELLUR P.O., THRISSUR-680 590.
9 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
THRISSUR-680 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, OFFICER OF THE KSPCB,
THRISSUR-680 001.
10 STATION OFFICER,
FIRE AND RESCUE STATION, OFFICE OF THE FIRE
AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT, KUMARANELLUR P.O.,
WADAKANCHERY, THRISSUR-680 590.
SC. P.P. . THAJUDHEEN
ADV.SHOBY K FRANSIS
ADV.K.J.MANURAJ GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
22.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOW-
ING:
R.P. No.117 of 2021
in
W.P.(C) No.21734 of 2020
3
R.P. No.117 of 2021
in
W.P.(C) No.21734 of 2020
----------------------------------------------
ORDER
The last sentence in paragraph 3 of the judgment is
deleted since the question as to whether the tenth respondent
in the writ petition is entitled to use the building referred to in
the judgment for recreation activities has not been adjudicated
in the judgment.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
YKB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!