Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6085 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 30TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.3647 OF 2021(E)
PETITIONER:
RAJEEV KUMAR
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O. SUNDARAN, THEKKE VEEDU, VALLIKODE P.O.
PALAKKAD - 678 001.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.VINOD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, ERSTWHILE PALAKKAD
DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, TOWN BRANCH,
H.P.O. ROAD, PALAKKAD 678 001.
2 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER,
REGIONAL OFFICE, H.P.O. ROAD, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.3647/2021 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19th day of February 2021
Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.4,50,000/- in the
year 2015 from the respondent-Bank. However, because of
ailment of his father and financial constraints, he could not repay
the loan by paying instalments regularly. The petitioner wants to
clear the overdue amount of loan in 12 monthly instalments.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents
opposed the writ petition by contending that as of now the overdue
amount is Rs.7,08,023/- and as the petitioner is not regular in
repayment of loan, the entire loan was recalled, and notice under
Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act read with Rule 8 of Security
Interest (Enforcement) Rules has been issued. It is submitted that
the petitioner be directed to clear the overdue amount in eight
instalments.
4. I have considered the submissions so advanced. Keeping
in mind the facts of the instant case, this writ petition is disposed
of with the following directions:
The petitioner to clear the entire overdue amount of loan
along with other charges in 12 equated monthly instalments
commencing from 03.03.2021 apart from regular payment of EMIs.
If the petitioner follows this direction, respondents shall keep the
action under the SARFAESI Act initiated against the petitioner in
abeyance. A single default in compliance of these directions shall
entail the respondents to continue action under the SARFAESI Act
against the petitioner. No further extension of time for compliance
of these directions shall be granted.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.M.BADAR
JUDGE
smp
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED NIL ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
True Copy
P.S to Judge
smp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!