Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5781 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
PETITIONER:
GOWTAM CHANDRAN SALGAR
AGED 41 YEARS
S/O NARASIMHA RAO SALGAR,
THACHAPPILLY HOUSE, TELEPHONE EXCHANGE ROAD,
MADAVANA, KUMBLAM P O, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A
SMT.M.A.SULFIA
SRI.M.J.PAVU
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695011.
2 THE LOCAL AUTHORISATION
COMMITTEE, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE TRANSPLANTATION OF
HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED OFFICER, MEDICAL COLLEGE, MEDICAL COLLEGE
P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695011.
3 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688524.
4 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
POOCHAKKAL POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-
688524.
5 THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORISING COMMITTEE
CONSTITUTED UNDER THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN
ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL,
KALAMASSERY MEDICAL COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM-683104.
6 THE DIRECTOR
NEPHROLOGY AND CHIEF OF RENAL TRANSPLANT SERVICES,
LAKESHORE HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH CENTRE LTD,
NATIONAL HIGHWAY-47 BYPASS, MARADU, NETTOOR, KOCHI-
WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
2
682040.
ADDL.R7 RAMANI, AGED 52, W/O PRATHAPAN A.R, MELOOTTU
PUTHENPARAMBU VEEDU, PANAVALLY P.O, PANAVALLY
VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-
688 526
ADDL.R8 LOCAL APPROVAL COMMITTEE OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION,
LAKESHORE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE
LTD.,NATIONAL HIGHWAY -47 BYPASS, MARADU, NETTOOR,
KOCHI-682 040, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF MEDICAL
OFFICER.
ADDITIONAL R7 AND R8 IMLEADED AS PER THE ORDER
DATED 9/2/2021 IN I.A.1/2021 IN W.P.(C)2747/2021
R6, R8 BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
R6, R8 BY ADV. SRI.D.PREM KAMATH
R6, R8 BY ADV. SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL)
R6, R8 BY ADV. SHRI.ABEL TOM BENNY
R6, R8 BY ADV. SHRI.JYOTHISH KRISHNA
R6, R8 BY ADV. SHRI.KURIAN OOMMEN THERAKATH
R6, R8 BY ADV. SHRI.JAIKRISHNAN.M.PISHARODI
R7 BY ADV. SRI.A.E.ALIYAR
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of February 2021
The petitioner is a kidney patient undergoing
treatment in Lakeshore Hospital, Maradu, and he is
advised to have transplantation of kidney. It is
also stated that the additional 7th respondent has
agreed to donate her kidney, since there are no
close relatives of petitioner with kidneys
suitable for the petitioner.
2. The petitioners submitted that though they
have submitted application along with all the
documents before the 2nd respondent, the same is
not forwarded.
3. The additional 7th respondent, who is the
doner, has also entered appearance.
4. Heard Sri.Benny P.Thomas, the learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the addtitional 8th
respondent, who submitted that the petitioner is a
patient undergoing treatment in the Lakeshore WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
Hospital. It is stated that no application or
documents were produced before the additional 8th
respondent. In the circumstances of the case, it
is stated that, as soon as the petitioner submits
the application along with all the requisite
documents, it would be forwarded to the 2nd
respondent.
5. The Transplantation of kidney from
unrelated donors is governed by Section 9(3) of
the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues
Act, 1994('the Act, 1994') and Rule 7(3) of the
Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules
2014('the Rules 2014'). The 2nd respondent is the
authority constituted for examining the
application for transplantation of kidney, in such
circumstances, when the donor is not related to
the donee, in accordance with the provisions
contained in the Act and Rules.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of
with a direction to the additional 8th respondent
to forward the application along with all the WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
documents to the 2nd respondent within a period of
three days from its receipt. There shall be a
further direction to the 2nd respondent to examine
the application, along with the relevant documents
after obtaining a report from the 3rd respondent
and to take a decision on it, in accordance with
the provisions contained in Section 9(3) of the
Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act,
1994 as well as Rule 7(3) of the Transplantation
of Human Organs and Tissues Rules 2014, as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a
period of one month from the date of receipt of a
copy of the judgment.
The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM WP(C).No.2747 OF 2021(P)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM 6TH RESPONDENT -LAKESHORE HOSPITAL, MARADU DATED 28/1/2021.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUISITION LETTER FORWARDED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT TO 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 19/10/2020.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!