Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.M. Benny vs The Supernatant
2021 Latest Caselaw 4376 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4376 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
K.M. Benny vs The Supernatant on 5 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

     FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 16TH MAGHA,1942

                      WP(C).No.25119 OF 2020(L)


PETITIONER:

               K.M. BENNY,
               AGED 46 YEARS
               S/O MATHAI,57,KANJIRAMALAYIL,
               VATTAKKANNIPARA,KUTHUNGAL.P.O,
               RAJAKKAD,IDUKKI DISTRICT,PIN-685566.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.R.RANJITH (MANJERI)
               SMT.T.U.ANUKRISHNA

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE SUPERNATANT
               MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL,GANDHINAGAR,
               KOTTAYAM-8.

      2        THE ADIMALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
               REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
               ADIMALI,IDUKKI DISTRICT-685561.

      3        THE SECRETARY,
               ADIMALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,ADIMALI,
               IDUKKI DISTRICT-685561.

      4        ADDL.R4. SREEDEVI,
               W/O. K.M. BENNY, 57, KANJIRAMALAYIL, VATTAKKANNIPARA,
               KUTHUNGAL.P.O., RAJAKKAD, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685566.
               (ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 3-2-2021 IN
               IA 1/2020 IN WP(C) 25119/2020).

               R4 BY ADV. SRI.A.P.NIDHIN KUMAR


               SMT.PRINCY XAVIER,GP,SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN,SC

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.25119/2020
                                       2




                                JUDGMENT

Dated this the 05th day of February 2021

The complaint of the petitioner is over the delay

in effecting change in the entry against the 'name of

father' in Ext.P1 Birth Certificate of his son Master

Amruth. It is stated that the name of Ex-husband of

the mother of the child - 'Shajan V.J.' is given

against the said column instead of the name of

petitioner, stating that the child was born to

petitioner and Sreedevi who is impleaded as 4th

respondent. Even though the petitioner had approached

the Adimali Grama Panchayath, they had asked him to

produce the report after conducting DNA test from a

Government recognised lab and stated that only

thereafter the Birth Certificate can be corrected.

Thereupon the petitioner approached the 1st respondent

requesting for conducting the DNA test. The 1 st

respondent as per Ext.P4 letter informed the petitioner

that such test can be conducted only on the basis of a

request being made by the Local Body and the report can W.P.(C) No.25119/2020

also be made available to them only. The 3rd respondent

thereupon issued Ext.P6 letter requesting the 1st

respondent to furnish the report after conducting DNA

test in order to correct the name on the request made

by the petitioner. Ext.P6 letter was issued on

04.09.2020. The petitioner has approached this Court,

as no further action was taken.

2. The mother of the child has also entered

appearance on her impleadment as additional 4 th

respondent. According to both of them the child Amruth

is the son of Sri.K.M.Benny, the petitioner and they

want correction in the Birth Certificate saying that

the name of father in the Birth Certificate happened to

be entered as 'Shajan V.J' on the basis of some

mistaken information given at the time of birth.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,

the learned Government Pleader, the learned Standing

counsel for the Panchayath and the learned counsel for

the 4th respondent. The only condition in Ext.P4, was

that there should be a request from the Panchayath for

conducting the DNA test. The Panchayath has already W.P.(C) No.25119/2020

made the request in Ext.P6 letter.

4. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the

1st respondent to subject the petitioner and his son to

DNA test and to furnish a report with its result to the

2nd respondent, Adimali Grama Panchayath, as

expeditiously as possible within a period of six weeks.

On receipt of the said report from the 1st respondent,

the respondents 2 and 3 shall take further proceedings

on the request of petitioner for correction in the

Birth Certificate within a further period of one week.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM W.P.(C) No.25119/2020

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE CHILD,AMRUTH

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 8/07/2020.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR UTILIZATION OF THE LAND PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER,DATED 8/8/2020

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 4/9/2020.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter