Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sonu B.S vs District Police Chief (Rural)
2021 Latest Caselaw 4332 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4332 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sonu B.S vs District Police Chief (Rural) on 5 February, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                      &

                 THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA

      FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 16TH MAGHA,1942

                         WP(Crl.).No.26 OF 2021

PETITIONER/S:
                SONU B.S.
                AGED 32 YEARS
                S/O. G.BABU, KRISHNA BHAVAN, ARATTUKUZHI, KUTTALI
                P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 505

                BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN

RESPONDENT/S:
       1      DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (RURAL),
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, VIKAS BHAVAN,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
       2      THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
              NEYYATTINKARA SUB DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695
              124.
       3      STATION HOUSE OFFICER
              BALARAMAPURAM POLICE STATION, BALARAMAPURAM P.O.,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 016.
       4      PUSHPAKUMAR D. (FATHER)
              PUSHPA VIHAR, MANGALATHUKONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O.,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501.
       5      BEENA J. (MOTHER)
              PUSHPA VIHAR, MANGALATHUKONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O.,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501.
       6      SUBIN (BROTHER)
              PUSHPA VIHAR, MANGALATHUKONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O.,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501.
              R1-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
              R4-6 BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE

OTHER PRESENT:
             SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
05.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(Crl.).No.26 OF 2021

                                 2



                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of February 2021

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition claiming

that respondents 4 and 5 along with respondent No.6 have

illegally detained their daughter 'Subi'. The detention was also

alleged to be on account of their objection with respect to the

relationship between the petitioner and the alleged detenue. We

had taken a statement from her through a Woman Police Officer.

In the statement, she had specifically stated that she wanted to

go with the petitioner and that she was in the illegal detention of

her parents.

2. Today, the detenue was produced before us. The

petitioner and his mother are present. We interacted with the

detenue and we were categorically informed that she wants to

go along with the petitioner. The mother of petitioner was also

present before us, who said that she is ready to accept the

alleged detenue as her daughter-in-law. In such circumstances,

we release the petitioner and direct her to go according to her

own free will with the petitioner.

WP(Crl.).No.26 OF 2021

3. Before we leave with the matter, we notice a particular

fact which has been brought to our notice by the learned counsel

for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner tells us

that immediately after our order on 01.02.2021, on the 2nd of

February, the girl was taken from her parental residence. We

specifically asked the detenue whether it was true and she said

it was. However, she has no complaints since she was illegally

detained by her parents. She was housed in the Mahila Mandir

for the last three days.

4. The learned Senior Government Pleader also submits

on instruction that the police apprehended that there was a

chance of the alleged detenue being removed from her parental

residence. We do not find fault with the police for having taken

the alleged detenue from her parental residence, in the given

circumstances. However, if such a measure is undertaken, then

it is incumbent on the police to immediately inform the Court

through the learned Government Pleader and also produce the

detenu at the earliest point of time; even before the next date of

posting of the case. We hope, there will be suitable directions

issued to all the police personnel, with respect to habeas corpus

matters.

WP(Crl.).No.26 OF 2021

5. We direct a copy of the judgment to be sent to the

State Police Chief for proper instructions to be circulated.

Writ petition is allowed with the above directions.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN

JUDGE

Sd/-

                                            M.R.ANITHA

shg                                           JUDGE
 WP(Crl.).No.26 OF 2021





                             APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1               PHOTOCOPY OF THE WHATSAPP MESSAGE SENT BY
                         THE DETENUE TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P2               PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16.1.2021

FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter