Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajomon vs Missy M.J
2021 Latest Caselaw 4094 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4094 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Ajomon vs Missy M.J on 4 February, 2021
                                        1
OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                                        &

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

     THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942

                              OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021

PETITIONER/S:

                   AJOMON
                   AGED 42 YEARS
                   S/O MATHEW,
                   VETTITHANAM HOUSE,
                   CHANGANACHERY TALUK, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, VEROOR
                   KARA, KURISUMMMODU P O, PIN-686104, NOW EMPLOYED
                   AND RESIDING AT STREET NO. 3, BLOCK NO. 4, BUILDING
                   NO. 25, FLOOR NO.3,FLAT NO. 15, JLEEP AL SHUYOUKH,
                   KUWAIT.

                   BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR

RESPONDENT/S:

         1         MISSY M.J
                   AGED 42 YEARS
                   D/O JOSE M A, MALAYIL HOUSE, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE,
                   KOZHA KARA, KOZHA P O, PIN-686640.
                   NOW EMPLOYED AND RESIDING AT STREET NO.3, BLOCK NO.
                   4, BUILDING NO. 25, FLOOR NO.3, FLAT NO. 15, JLEEP
                   AL SHUYOUKH, KUWAIT.

         2         SUB REGISTRAR
                   OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, CHANGANACHERRY, PIN-
                   686101.


     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                        2
OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021




            A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & C.S.DIAS, JJ.
               ======================
                    OP(FC) No.81 of 2021
               ======================
            Dated this the 4th day of February, 2021.

                                   JUDGMENT

C.S.DIAS, J.

This original petition is filed, under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, to direct the Family Court, Pala to

consider and dispose of Ext P7 (IA 7/2021), in accordance

with law, or to modify the order in I.A No.1/2020 in OP

58/2020, so as to enable the petitioner to execute sale deed

in respect of 4.75 Ares in Block No.3 Survey No.230/9 of

Chethipuzha Village, Changanacherry Taluk, Kottayam

District.

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, in the original

petition is that the first respondent is his wife. They were

married on 8.9.2011. The second respondent is the Sub

Registrar, Changanacherry. The first respondent has filed

OP 58/2020(Ext P1) before the Family Court, seeking a

OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021

decree to declare that she is the owner with title and

possession in respect of the properties scheduled in the

original petition. The properties scheduled in Ext P1 were

purchased by her utilizing her funds. Along with the original

petition, the first respondent filed IA 1/2020 (Ext P2)

seeking an ad-interim injunction. The Family Court allowed

Ext P2 by passing an order of temporary injunction

restraining the petitioner from transferring or alienating the

petition schedule properties or creating any encumbrance

over it till the disposal of the original petition. The petitioner

has entered into Ext P4 agreement to sell the petition

schedule properties for a total consideration of

Rs.1,20,00,000/-. The petitioner and the first respondent

have now filed an application for modification of the interim

injunction on condition that the sale consideration of

Rs.12,00,000/- would be transferred to the account of the

first respondent on encashment of the cheque (Ext P5). The

request of the petitioner has been accepted by the first

respondent pursuant to which she has filed Ext P6 and P6(a)

affidavits. In Exts P6 and P6(a) affidavits the first

OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021

respondent has categorically stated that the dispute with

respect to petition III schedule property has been settled

between him and the petitioner. However, the dispute with

regard to petition I and II schedule properties is not settled.

Therefore, the first respondent has no objection in the

interim injunction dated 28.1.2020 in IA 1/2020 being

vacated in respect of the petition III schedule property.

Even though the petitioner has filed IA 7/2021 before the

Family Court, the matter is not being listed as the Presiding

Officer of the Court passed away. Hence, the petitioner is

unable to obtain orders on Ext P7 application. The

petitioner thus prays that the order in IA 2/2020 may be

modified by vacating the ad interim injunction in respect of

petition III schedule property.

3. Heard Sri.M.Narendra Kumar, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner, Sri.K.T Jacob, the learned

counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned

Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent

OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021

in unison submitted that the dispute in respect of petition III

schedule property has been settled between the petitioner

and the first respondent pursuant to which the first

respondent has filed Ext P6 and P6(a) affidavits before the

Family Court. However, in view of the fact that there is no

sitting before the Court, Ext P7 application is pending

consideration. As the time is of the essence of the contract

in respect of the sale transaction, it is necessary that the

ad interim injunction order in IA 1/2020 be modified, so as

to enable the petitioner can execute the sale deed in respect

of petition III schedule property and sale consideration can

be handed over to the first respondent.

5. Taking into consideration the pleadings and

materials on record, the fact that there is no sitting in the

Family Court, after hearing the respective counsel for the

parties and the harmonious settlement arrived at between

the parties in respect of petition III schedule property, in

exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court as

enshrined under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, we

allow the original petition by modifying the order in IA

OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021

1/2020 in OP 58/2020 and permit the petitioner to execute

the sale deed in respect of petition III schedule property as

agreed by the first respondent in Exts P6 and P6 (a)

affidavits.

The original petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

Sd/-

                                           C.S.DIAS

SKS/4.2.2021                                 JUDGE

OP (FC).No.81 OF 2021




                            APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1              TRUE COPY OF THE OP NO. 58/2020 DATED

27/1/2020 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, PALA.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF IA 1/2020 IN OP NO. 58/2020 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, PALA.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION DATED 13.11.2020.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 18/1/2021 EXECUTED BY PETITIONER AND 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CHEQUE DATED 18/01/2021.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 24.1.2021.

EXHIBIT P6(A) TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 24.1.2021.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF IA NO. 7 OF 2021 IN OP 58/2020 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, PALA.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter