Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thomas.M.V vs The Special Tahsildar (La And Lt)
2021 Latest Caselaw 4084 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4084 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Thomas.M.V vs The Special Tahsildar (La And Lt) on 4 February, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

   THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942

                       WP(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)


PETITIONER/S:

                THOMAS.M.V, AGED 54 YEARS
                S/O.VARKEY, MULLAPPALLI HOUSE, HILLVIEW NAGAR
                PERIMBADARI DESOM, PERIMBADARI P.O, MANNARKADU
                VILLAGE, MANNARKADU TALUK, PALAKKADU-678762.

                BY ADVS.
                SRI.N.A.RETHEESH
                SRI.PRASUN.S
                SRI.K.M.SREEKANTH

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA AND LT),
                OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,
                AGALI, PALAKKAD-678581.

      2         THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
                MANNARKADU-I VILLAGE, MANNARKADU,
                PALAKKADU DISTRICT-678582.


OTHER PRESENT:

                SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

                                 -2-

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226

of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus

commanding the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider

and pass orders in S.M.No.279/2020 on the file of the Land

Tribunal, Agali, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The

suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Agali under

Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment)

Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest

of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the

Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of

purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of

the said Rules, in respect of 1.1150 Hectares of land comprised

in Sy.No.70/1-180 of Mannarkad-I Village, Mannarkad Taluk in

Palakkad District.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also

the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. In Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special

Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases]

this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious

disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for

obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised

the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the

Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious

disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a

routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing

the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would

result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending

before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to

dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration

of such cases.

4. In Narayanan Namboodiri, this Court noticed that

by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of

Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the

jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of

the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of

the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action

necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said

Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the

reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court,

the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the

cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land

Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in

some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice

on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such

cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to

such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances,

this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions.

Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus;

"2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal:

(i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained.

(ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months.

(iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority.

(iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications.

(v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above.

(vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

cases, the directions shall be strictly followed.

(vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment." (underline supplied)

5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village

Officer, Mannarkkad-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Agali, initiated

suo motu proceedings as S.M.No.279/2020, as evidenced by

Ext.P5 receipt dated 19.06.2020, for assignment of the right,

title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under

Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance

of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read

with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred

to hereinbefore.

6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point

out that the total pendency of suo motu proceedings in the Land

Tribunal, Agali is 3951.

7. Having considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land

Tribunal, Agali can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.279/2020

following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan

Namboodiri, referred to supra.

W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by

directing the Land Tribunal, Agali, to dispose of

S.M.No.279/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the

directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in

Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra.

No order as to costs.

Sd/-

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.

bkn/-

W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1                  TRUE PHOTO COPY OF      THE SALE DEED
                            NO.5653/2019    DATED   27.12.2019 OF
                            MANNARKADU SRO.

EXHIBIT P2                  THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT
                            DATED 13.01.2020.

EXHIBIT P3                  THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE REPORT

SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING NO.100/2020 DATED 18.06.2020.

EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.06.2020 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5                  THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE APPROVED
                            BUILDING     PERMIT     NO.E1    CLERK-
                            BA(28667)/2020 DATED 07.12.2020.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter