Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Radhika Ramesh vs Central Board Of Secondary ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3907 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3907 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Radhika Ramesh vs Central Board Of Secondary ... on 3 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

    WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 14TH MAGHA,1942

                      WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020(E)


PETITIONER:

               RADHIKA RAMESH
               AGED 35 YEARS
               D/O.RAMESHAN NAIR,
               TC 17/598,
               PATHIRAPILLY LANE,
               POOJAPURA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
               PIN-695 012.

               BY ADVS.
               SHRI.K.NIRMALAN
               SRI.ANAND B. MENON

RESPONDENTS:

      1        CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
               REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER,
               PLOT NO.3, (OLD NO.1630-A),
               J BLOCK, 19TH MAIN ROAD,
               ANNA NAGAR WEST,
               CHENNAI,
               PIN-600 040.

      2        THE DEPUTY SECRETARY,
               CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
               REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER,
               PLOT NO.3 (OLD NO.1630-A),
               J BLOCK, 19TH MAIN ROAD,
               ANNA NAGAR WEST,
               CHENNAI, PIN-600 040.

      3        THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
               CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
               PLOT NO.3 (OD NO.1630-A),
               J BLOCK, 19TH MAIN ROAD,
               ANNA NAGAR WEST,
               CHENNAI, PIN-600 040.

      4        CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
               REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER,
               BLOCK B, 2ND FLOOR,
 WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020

                                 2

               LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS,
               PATTOM,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.

       5       ST.MARYS RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL SCHOOL,
               POOJAPURA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012,
               REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL.

               R1-4 BY SRI.NIRMAL S., SC, CBSE
               R5 BY ADV. SHRI.K.B.GANGESH

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020

                                     3




                                  JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of February 2021

Petitioner appeared for CBSE examination during

the academic year 2000 - 2001 in the fifth respondent

school. Ext.P2 CBSE certificate was issued to her. It

was seen from Ext.P2 certificate that, her date of

birth was recorded as 05.01.1986. According to the

petitioner, her actual date of birth, as evidenced from

Ext.P1 birth certificate, is 05.01.1985. According to

the petitioner, a wrong date of birth was given at the

time of admission to the school, by mistake. Claiming

that, it was a clerical mistake liable to be corrected,

Ext.P4 request letter was submitted by the

petitioner's father before the fifth respondent School.

Ext.P5 is the letter submitted by the fifth respondent

before the first respondent for correction of the date

of birth of the petitioner. Even after one year from

the date of sending Ext.P5 by the fifth respondent,

first respondent had not considered the application. WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020

Aggrieved by exorbitant delay on the part of the first

respondent in correcting the date of birth, petitioner

has approached this Court claiming that mistake in the

date of birth in Ext.P2 is liable to be corrected in

consonance with Ext.P1 birth certificate.

2. To substantiate the contention of the

petitioner, he relied on the decision reported in Subin

Mohammed v. Union of India and others ( 2016 (1) KLT

340). It was contended that pursuant to the above

decision, this court has been consistently giving

direction to the CBSE to make appropriate corrections

in the date of birth.

3. Opposing the contention of the petitioner,

learned counsel for the CBSE contended that, CBSE can

correct only genuine clerical mistakes and application

for correction of date of birth, that too, before the

expiry of the prescribed period. It was also contended

that the decision of the Division Bench in Subin

Mohammed's case has been challenged and is pending

before the Supreme Court.

WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020

4. Evidently, the date of birth mentioned in Ext.P2

is not in consonance with the actual date of birth seen

from Ext.P1. To that extent, mistake is liable to be

corrected. The petitioner has explained the reason

for delay in proposing the application. Having

satisfied about this, I am inclined to dispose of the

writ petition on the following terms;

i). Petitioner shall file a fresh application to

the second respondent requesting for correction of the

date of birth. Copy of Ext.P1 shall be placed along

with the application proposed to be filed.

ii). Applicant shall also enclose a DD for Rs.

5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) drawn in favour of

the CBSE, Chennai Branch as costs. Such application

along with DD shall be filed within three weeks from

today.

iii). The petitioner shall also additionally remit

a sum of Rs.1,500/- ( Rupees one thousand five hundred

only) in the office of the second respondent as their

expenses for the above process.

iv). 2nd respondent shall carry out correction of WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020

the date of birth in the school records in accordance

with Ext.P1 within a period of three weeks from the

date of receipt of application.

v). On such correction, the records shall be

forthwith forwarded to the Regional Office, CBSE,

Chennai ,along with the DD. The CBSE, Chennai shall

process the above application and take steps for

issuing necessary certificate with corrected date of

birth. This shall be completed within three weeks of

receiving the records from the second respondent along

with DD.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

                                            SUNIL THOMAS
                                                  JUDGE

Jms                        //True Copy//   P.A to Judge
 WP(C).No.27641 OF 2020





                             APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1               A TRUE COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED

16.10.2007 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATHS, THIRUVANANTHAPRAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PASS CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER IN ALL INDIA SECONDARY SCHOOL EXAMINATION, 2001 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF MARK STATEMENT OF PETITIONER IN ALL INDIA SECONDARY SCHOOL EXAMINATION, 2001 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST LETTER DATED 14.08.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIFTH RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER'S FATHER.

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 19.08.2019 FOR THE CORRECTION OF DATE OF BIRTH OF THE PETITIONER SUBMITTED TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE EXTRACT OF THEE-MAIL COMMUNICATION DATED 30.09.2020 SEND TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.09.2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA 681 OF 2020 BETWEEN FRIJO XAVIER V CBSE AND OTHERS.

//True Copy// P.A to Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter