Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

James Fernandez vs District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 3502 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3502 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
James Fernandez vs District Collector on 1 February, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

     THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR

                               &

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

 MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942

                   WP(C).No.1332 OF 2014(S)


PETITIONER:

              JAMES FERNANDEZ
              PEOPLE'S ACTION COUNCIL AGAINST HPCL
              ATF TANK PROJECT AT VALIYATHURA,
              RESIDING AT JC VILLA, VALIYATHOPPU,
              VALLAKKADAVU P.O.,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008.

              BY ADVS.
              SHRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM
              ASWIN P JOHN
              SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW

RESPONDENTS:

     1        DISTRICT COLLECTOR
              TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

     2        DIRECTOR OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

     3        ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
              KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
              DISTRICT OFFICE, PLAMOOD JUNCTION,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008.

     4        TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
              CORPORATION OFFICE,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
   W.P(C).1332/2014
                               2

      5       CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES
              PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSION SAFETY ORGANIZATION
              (PESO), 5TH FLOOR, A-BLOCK, CGO COMPLEX,
              SEMINARY HILLS, NAGPUR-440 006.

      6       AIRPORT DIRECTOR
              AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008.

      7       MS. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
              HINDUSTAN BHAVAN, 8,
              SHOORJI VALLABHDAS MARG, MUMBAI,
              MAHARASHTRA-400 001.

      8       STATION MANAGER
              HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.,
              INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008.

      9       SHRI. LAWRENCE JUSA
              NOS.704 & 707, LAKESIDE,
              RAHEJA VIHAR, POWAI, MUMBAI-400 072.

              R1-2 BY STATE ATTORNEY
              R1-2 BY SRI. SURIN GEORGE IPE, SR. GOVT.
                                                 PLEDER
              R3 BY ADV. SRI. T.NAVEEN , SC, KERALA STATE
                                   POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
              R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR
              R5 BY SRI. P. VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
              R6 BY ADV. SRI.V.SANTHARAM
              BY ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON SR.
              R7, 8 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
              R7, 8 BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
              R7, 8 BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
              R7, 8 BY SMT. RAMOLA
              R5 BY SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP               FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME               DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
        W.P(C).1332/2014
                                            3



                                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of February, 2021

S. Manikumar, CJ.

Petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:

"i) Call for the records leading to Exhibit P1 to P5 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 1 st respondent not to permit the 7th respondent company to install and run the AFT tank farm in the plot of land having an extent of 46 cents comprised in Survey Nos.1790/F 5-3 & 1790/F 5-4-2 of Petah Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk in Thiruvananthapuram District belonging to the 9th respondent."

2. Mr. Anand Padmanabhan, representing Mr. Thomas,

Abraham, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs

sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous.

3. That apart, based on the affidavit dated 18.8.2014,

Ms.Ramola, learned counsel appearing for the Oil Corporation

submitted that unit has already been installed and commissioned also.

Placing on record the above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

S. Manikumar, Chief Justice

Sd/-

Shaji P. Chaly, Judge sou.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter