Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Adv.Anupama Sripathi vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 3473 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3473 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Adv.Anupama Sripathi vs The State Of Kerala on 1 February, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

    MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942

                       WP(C).No.1643 OF 2021(E)


PETITIONER:

                ADV.ANUPAMA SRIPATHI
                AGED 29 YEARS
                W/O.ADV.K.R.SRIPATHI, 43/119, SOUMYAM, PAWATHIL
                ROAD, AYYAPPANKAVU, COCHIN - 682 018. PRESENTLY
                RESIDING AT KANNANCHERY HOUSE, VRINDAPURI,
                POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR - 680 002.

                BY ADVS.
                SRI.V.HARIKRISHNAN
                SRI.K.R.SRIPATHI

RESPONDENTS:-

      1         THE STATE OF KERALA
                REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HIGHER
                EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      2         COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS
                OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE
                EXAMINATIONS HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHINAGAR,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      3         UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
                REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY
                POST, THENIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635.

      4         GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE
                THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL,
                AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003.

                GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN
                STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21-01-2021, THE COURT ON 1-02-2021 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).No.1643/2021
                                         2

                           ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
                      = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                          W.P.(C).No.1643 of 2021
                     = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                  Dated this the 1st day of February, 2021

                                 JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers:-

"i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, to direct the respondents herein to fill the vacancies of EWS quota (L.L.M 2020 Admission) arising in the 2nd respondent, law college with the aspirants from the State Merit List.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, or order directing the respondent No.4 to accommodate the petitioner in the vacancy that has arisen in the EWS quota (L.L.M 2020 Admission), in a time bound manner, without causing prejudice to her education."

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

the petitioner was an applicant for admission to the L.L.M. Course

2020-2021 conducted for colleges in Kerala. Ext.P1 is the admission

notification. Petitioner secured Rank No.74 and was included in the W.P.(C).No.1643/2021

open merit quota. The option submitted by the petitioner was for

admission to L.L.M in the 4th respondent institution, that is, the

Government Law College, Thrissur. It is submitted that the last

candidate who secured admission in the 4 th respondent institution

in the open merit category was Rank No.67. It is submitted that on

26.12.2020, the vacancy list was published where the 4 th respondent

had vacancies only in the EWS quota and the petitioner was disabled

from applying. It is submitted that in the spot admissions conducted

on 31.12.2020 also, there were no applicants in the EWS quota. It is

contented that since the prospectus provides that the unavailed

seats will be made available to candidates under the State Merit List,

the petitioner is entitled to be considered for admission on the basis

of her ranking to the EWS quota seats as well.

4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1,

2 and 4, on the other hand, submits that the EWS quota seats were

not provided for in the original notification and that specific

supernumerary seats were created for accommodating candidates

under the said quota which became available due to the constitution W.P.(C).No.1643/2021

amendment and the Government Orders issued on the subject. It is

submitted that Clause 8(C) of Ext.P1 prospectus specifically states

that since the reservation for Economically Weaker Sections in the

General Category was decided to be implemented to Higher

Educational Institutions in the State, the institution wise break up

under EWS quota will be notified separately as and when the

required supernumerary seats are sanctioned. It is submitted that

the supernumerary seats were sanctioned by the Government by an

order dated 05.03.2020 sanctioning two such seats to the

Government Law College, Thrissur. It is submitted that the two

seats had been sanctioned only for accommodating EWS candidates

and that the provisions with regard to passing over of the terms

would be completely inapplicable to such seats. An observation

contained in a decision of this Court dated 30.10.2020 in W.P.(C).

No.23141/2020 and connected cases is relied on to contend that the

supernumerary seats created for accommodating the quota

sanctioned for EWS cannot be filled up by candidates from any other

category. It is further submitted that the last date for making W.P.(C).No.1643/2021

admissions even by spot allotments stand completed and therefore,

no further directions may be issued by this Court.

5. I have considered the contentions advanced. It is clear from

the documents made available to me that the seats available for the

10% EWS quota were not part of the seats available for admission

under Ext.P1 prospectus. By Government Order dated 05.03.2020,

supernumerary seats had been made available in the Government

Institutions for accommodating the candidates claiming the benefit

of the EWS quota. Since the seats are specifically supernumerary in

character and are intended only to be filled up by admitting

candidates who claim admission under the EWS quota, this Court in

the judgment referred to specifically found that such seats could not

be allotted to any candidate except an EWS candidate.

In view of the fact that the provisions of the prospectus with

regard to unavailed seats are not applicable to the supernumerary

seats created for accommodating EWS candidates, I am of the

opinion that the prayers sought for in the writ petition cannot be W.P.(C).No.1643/2021

granted. The writ petition thus fails and the same is, accordingly,

dismissed.

sd/-

Anu Sivaraman, Judge sj/NP W.P.(C).No.1643/2021

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 15/05/2020 ALONG WITH THE PROSPECTUS PERTAINING TO THE LLM ADMISSION 2020-21.

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ADMIT CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DATA SHEET OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN FEATURING HER RANK ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAST RANK DETAILS OF SECOND PHASE ALLOTMENT ON 22/12/2020 PUBLISHED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE VACANCY DETAILS AS ON 26/12/2020 PUBLISHED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT HEREIN ON 26/12/2020.

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 28/12/2020.

True copy

PS to Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter