Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17629 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 5TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 12372 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1 ANITHA V.P., AGED 58 YEARS, W/O.P.V.THANKACHAN,
VENPARAMBIL MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PINCODE-688 525.
2 SHEELAMMA V.P., W/O.C.R.RENJITH, AGED 56, CHERUKAATTIL,
SL PURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 523.
3 RETHI V.P., W/O.REMESHAN, AGED 50, LEKSHMI VILASAM,
NETHAJI P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-689121.
BY ADVS.
MANU HARSHAKUMAR
MARY ANN SAJI
RESPONDENTS:
1 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA
ALAPPUZHA, DYSP OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PINCODE-688 012.
(*CORRECTED AS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
CHERTHALA, DYSP OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN-688524., AS PER ORDER DATED 26/07/2021 IN I.A.NO.
1/2021 IN WP(C)12372/2021)
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUHAMMA POLICE STATION,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 525.
3 SUKUMARAN, S/O.KOCHUAYYAPPAN, AGED 72, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE,
MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 525.
4 ANIL KUMAR, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 43, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE,
MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 525.
5 SUNIL KUMAR, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 46, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE,
MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 525.
WPC 12372/21
2
6 SIJUMON, S/O.BHARGAVAN, AGED 42, THOTTUNGAL
HOUSE, MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-
688 525.
7 GIREESHAN, S/O.NARAYANAN OORALISSERIL, AGED 52,
MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PINCODE-688
525.
8 JOY, S/O.NADESHAN, MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT, PINCODE-688 525.
BY ADVS.
T.JAYAKRISHNAN
R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA)
SRI.E.C.BINEESH - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 27.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC 12372/21
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners allege that they are facing
incessant threats and intimidation from
respondents 3 to 8, who are their neighbours; and
that they were, therefore, constrained to approach
respondents 1 and 2, through Ext.P1
representation, seeking protection for their lives
and properties. They allege that the party
respondents have political affiliations and
therefore, that the Police have not taken any
action on their representation, in spite of the
fact that there have been verified threats against
them in the past. They, therefore, pray that
respondents 1 and 2 be directed to afford them
adequate and effective protection from the illegal
actions of respondents 3 to 8.
2. I have heard Sri.Manu Harshakumar -
learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri.Krishna
Kumar - learned counsel for respondents 3 to 8 and WPC 12372/21
Sri.E.C.Bineesh - learned Government Pleader for
respondents 1 and 2.
3. The allegations of the petitioners as
afore were vehemently refuted by Sri.Krishnakumar,
saying that a counter affidavit has been filed by
his clients, wherein, the true facts have been set
out. He submitted that his clients have, at no
point of time, threatened or attempted to threaten
the petitioners, as has been alleged by them and
that in fact, it is they who have violated certain
orders and decrees of the competent Civil Court.
He contended that, it is, therefore, clear that
the attempt of the petitioners is to obtain orders
from this Court, in order to frustrate the civil
proceedings which are now pending between the
parties; and thus prayed that this Writ Petition
be dismissed.
4. The learned Government Pleader -
Sri.E.C.Bineesh, submitted that, as at present,
there are no law and order issues in the area in WPC 12372/21
question and that the Police are constantly
vigilant to ensure the parties do not take law
into their hands. He added that as and when any
complaint is received from any person, including
the petitioners, of the commission or an attempt
of infraction of law, necessary action under the
Indian Penal Code and such other applicable
Statutes will be taken forward.
5. The afore submissions of the parties make
it ineluctable that there are several civil
disputes between them. Obviously, therefore, this
Court will have to be careful while dealing with
the complaints made by them against each other
with respect to internecine threats and attacks.
6. That said, since respondents 3 to 8 say
that they have not and do not propose to cause any
harm to the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to
order this Writ Petition recording it.
Resultantly, I order this writ petition,
directing respondents 1 and 2 to ensure that the WPC 12372/21
lives of the petitioners and respondents 3 to 8
are sufficiently protected and that any complaints
to be made by any of them are dealt with swiftly
and quickly, ensuring that law and order is
maintained and that there is no breach of peace in
the area in question.
Needless to say, I clarify that I have not
considered the rival contentions of the parties,
with respect to the civil disputes between them on
its merits and that they are all left open to be
pursued by them appropriately.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
WPC 12372/21
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12372/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE
PETITIONERS BEFORE DYSP,ALAPPUZHA DATED 28.05.2021
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE PETITION FILED BY 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE SHO,MUHAMMA POLICE STATION, DATED 11.06.2021
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR BASED ON THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE DAUGHTER OF THE 1ST PETITIONER,DATED 13.06.2021.
Exhibit P4 PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5 RECEIPT DATED 27.06.2021.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29.06.2021.
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R4(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT BEFORE THE VACATION COURT, ALAPPUZHA AS CMP NO. 435/2021 DATED 30.04.2021 (NOW O.S. NO. 238/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA).
Exhibit R4(B) A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 04.05.2021 IN I.A. NO. 5/2021 IN O.S.NO. 238/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE VACATION JUDGE, ALAPPUZHA.
Exhibit R4(C) A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST WPC 12372/21
RESPONDENT DATED 21.07.2021.
Exhibit R4(D) A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION , I.A, FOR APPOINTING ADVOCATE COMMISSION TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN EXT. R4(A) DATED 12.07.2021.
Exhibit R4(E) A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION, I.A, FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN EXT. R4(A) DATED 12.07.2021.
Exhibit R4(F) A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION, I.A, FOR PROSECUTION FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN EXT. R4(A) DATED 12.07.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!