Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Jauhar Ali vs District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 17481 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17481 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Mohammed Jauhar Ali vs District Collector on 26 August, 2021
W.P.(C).No.3277 of 2018             1

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
                                    &
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
  THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 4TH BHADRA, 1943
                          WP(C) NO. 3277 OF 2018
PETITIONER:

             MOHAMMED JAUHAR ALI
             45 YEARS OF AGE,S/O. ABDULKADER HAJI (LATE),
             THORAPPA HOUSE,HAJIYAR PALLY.P.O.MALAPPURAM
             DISTRICT- 676 519
             BY ADV SRI.SHIRAZ ABDULLA


RESPONDENTS:

     1   DISTRICT COLLECTOR
         COLLECTORATE,MALAPPURAM.
    2    MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY
         REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON,MUNICIPAL
         OFFICE,MALAPPURAM- 676 505
    3    THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
         REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM- 676 001
    4    THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
         MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION (TRAFFIC UNIT)
         MALAPPURAM- 676 001.
 ADDL.R5 BUS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
         MALAPPURAM MUNCIPALITY, REP. BY OFFICE BEARER -
         RAFEEQ C.K., CHALATHIL KALLADI THODI, MUTTIPADI,
         MELMURI, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 517.
         ADDL.R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 10.4.2018
         IN I.A.NO.6236/18
 W.P.(C). No.3277 of 2018           :2:




 ADDL.R6 THE GENERAL SECRETARY
         ALL KERALA BUS OPERATORS ORGANIZATION,
         MALAPPURAM.
         ADDL.R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 14.6.2018
         IN I.A.NO.9488/18
 ADDL.R7 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS'
         ASSOCIATION,REGN. NO.TCR-609/1993, REPRESENTED BY
         ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, HAMZA ERIKUNNAN, CALICUT
         ROAD, MANJERI - 676 121, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
         ADDL.R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 26TH
         AUGUST, 2021 IN I.A.NO.3/2018.
         BY ADVS.
         SRI.TEK CHAND, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1,
         R3 & R4
         SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR FOR R5 & R6
         SRI.E.S.M.KABEER, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R2



      THIS     WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON    26.08.2021,   THE    COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C). No.3277 of 2018                :3:




                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of August, 2021

S. MANIKUMAR,CJ.

Instant Public Interest writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:

i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to take effective actions to make the newly constructed Municipal bus stand at Malappuram fully functional, forth with.

ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 3rd and 4th respondents to take necessary actions so as to compel the buses plying through Malappuram to enter into the new Municipal bus stand at Malappuram.

Iii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 4th respondent to deploy adequate Officers, to ensure that buses plying in the area are entering the Municipal bus stand at Malappuram, without fail.

iv. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents, to take strict actions against the bus owners/bus employees refusing to enter into the new Municipal bus stand at Malappuram.

2. Short fact leading to the writ petition are as follows;

3. Petitioner, claims to be a public spirited individual, representing

the interest of the bus commuters in particular and the public at large at

Malappuram in general. The District Collector, Malappuram -

respondent No.1, has completed the construction and inaugurated a

new Municipal bus stand at Malappuram on 27.05.2017. According to

the petitioner, construction of the new Municipal bus stand at

Malappuram was carried out by spending huge amount of money from

the public exchequer, so as to give benefit to the general public,

in particular, to the bus commuters of Malappuram.

4. It is submitted by the petitioner that though elaborate

arrangements have been made in the new Municipal bus stand for the

bus employees, commuters and traders, due to the highhandedness of

the bus owners and employees, buses plying through the area are not

entering into the new bus stand, without any valid reason. According

to him, this illegal act of the bus employees and the bus owners,

presumably with the connivance of the respondents, are causing untold

miseries and hardship to the public at Malappuram. Highlighting these

grievances, Exhibit P3 representation dated 2.6.2017 has been

submitted to respondent No.3 - the Regional Transport Officer,

Regional Transport Office, Malappuram, but no positive action is taken.

Hence the instant public interest writ petition is filed.

5. Material on record discloses that as per Exhibit P2 minutes of

the Traffic Regulation Committee convened on 22.5.17, the following

has been recorded:

"Decisions:

1. Instructions have been given to PWD, NH officers to install sign

boards on roads leading to the Municipality and in all important

junctions also to indicate main offices.

2. The Hon'ble Minister of Finance Sri.Thomas Isaac will inaugurate

the Bus Stand on 27.5.2017 at 9 a.m. After the inauguration, Police

has been instructed to take steps for all buses entry and exit in the

Bus Stand. It has been decided to make arrangements to get the land

located in front of the Police Station. Authorities have been directed to

repair the signal lights within the jurisdiction of the Municipality. Also

decided to convene a meeting regarding the parking problems faced

by Autoriskhaws.

PWD authorities have been directed to take steps to acquire

some land in Kottappady at the starting point towards Cherattukuzhi."

6. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that though

Malappuram bus stand has been constructed by spending public money,

bus operators do not enter into the said bus stand enabling the

commuters to avail the transport facility. Thus, in the above said

circumstances, the reliefs have been sought for.

7. Material on record also discloses that on the directions of this

Court to implead the bus owners association, writ petitioners have filed

I.A.No.6236/2018 to implead the above party as an additional

respondent in the writ petition and vide order dated 10.4.2018, I.A

No.6236/2018 has been ordered.

8. The Secretary, All Kerala Bus Operators Organization,

Malappuram Unit Committee, has filed I.A.No.9488/2018 to implead the

organisation as an additional respondent in the writ petition. At

paragraphs 3 & 4 of the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.9488/2018,

Secretary of the All Kerala Bus Operator Organisation - Malappuram Unit

Committee has stated thus:

"3. It is respectfully submitted that the writ petition itself is filed without any merits and bonafides. Services which are proceeding from Kozhikode and Kottakkal side reaches Kottapady and then reaches Police Station Junction. From there, in order to reach uphill, there are

two ways. One through the new bus stand and the other is the straight road. The Police Station Junction is the most congested area and there were accidents invariably. Hence there were meetings of the Regional Transport Authorities with the Municipal Authorities, Police Authorities and others and it was decided that all services proceeding from uphill to Police Station junction shall operate entering the bus stand. While they return, from Police Station Junction, they shall proceed through the straight road in order to avoid traffic Block and for stage carriages the said portion is declared as one-way also. It is also noted and convinced by the authorities that it is not feasible for heavy vehicles at Police Station Junction to turn and enter bus stand Road. Therefore the present system is maintained by the authorities for free flow of traffic as well as considering safety of the public and to avoid accidents.

4. The petitioner is motivating his business interest alone ignoring public safety and public convenience. The prayer in the writ petition is totally unsustainable and against pubic interest."

9. The said application has been ordered on 14.6.2018. Material

on record further discloses that I.A.No.3 of 2018 has been filed by

Malappuram District Private Bus Operators' Association, Manjeri,

to implead the association as an additional respondent in the writ

petition. At paragraphs 3 & 4 of the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.3

of 2018, the General Secretary of the above said association has averred

thus:

"3. In this connection, it is submitted that, the Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram has not so far approved the functioning of the Municipal bus stand at Malappuram. As per the decision of the Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram vide item No.194 dated 29.09.2015, it was decided that, while deciding the traffic regulations, the respective committee should make available all its members, the representatives of KSRTC and all aggrieved parties and shall reach a consensus proposal and get the approval of the Regional Transport Authority before implementing any traffic system. The petitioner association has already submitted a request before the Chairperson of the Traffic Regulatory Committee pointing out the above aspects. It is submitted that, since the Regional Transport Authority has not granted the approval of the Municipal bus stand, the prayers in the writ petition is premature.

4. It is submitted that, the petitioner association is a necessary party in the above writ petition (Civil) and petitioner association may be heard in all respects."

10. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned for impleading the

above party respondent. Accordingly, I.A.No.3/2018 is allowed.

11. On instructions, Mr.E.S.M.Kabeer, learned Standing Counsel

for the Malappuram Municipality, submitted that sufficient

arrangements have been made for the entry of buses into the

Municipal bus stand at Malappuram. Police assistance has also been

sought for, however, buses are operated under the permit conditions

of the Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram.

12. Mr.Tek Chand, learned Senior Government Pleader, submitted

that earlier, near Malappuram bus stand there was difference in gradient

and that there was no sufficient space for the buses to turn and enter

into the bus stand and the said difficulty has been cleared. He further

added that as per rule 344 of the Motor Vehicle Rules, before

construction of the bus stand, the local authority ought to have

consulted the Regional Transport Authority, which in the case on hand,

had not been done.

13. Be that as it may, when the bus stand is constructed, all the

buses where permit is granted from Manjeri to Palakkad and other

destinations, have to operate as per the permit conditions, and when the

newly constructed bus stand appears to be an intermediary point

between various destinations, they have to enter into the bus stand in

accordance with the permit conditions, provisions of the Motor Vehicles

Act & Rules and have to satisfy the requirement of the Municipality and

the law governing the field. Construction of the bus stand is to facilitate

the commuters for transportation to various destinations, but at the same

time, permit conditions have to be strictly followed.

14. Malappuram Municipality, respondent No.2, Regional Transport

Officer - Respondent No.3 and all the impleaded parties, should comply

with the directions in accordance with the statutory provisions and

permit conditions

With the above observations and directions, instant writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

S. MANIKUMAR,

CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/-

                                              SHAJI P. CHALY,
smv                                              JUDGE.





                     APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3277/2018

PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1          COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF
                    THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2          COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING
                    BETWEEN THE BUS OWNERS AND THE 2ND
                    RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3          COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO
                    THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4          COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE
                    2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5          COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER RTI ACT BY
                    THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5(A)       COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN TO THE
                    PETITIONER BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter