Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devassy vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 17395 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17395 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Devassy vs The Union Of India on 25 August, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
 WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 3RD BHADRA, 1943
                   WP(C) NO. 7344 OF 2014
PETITIONER/S:

    1     DEVASSY
          AGED 57 YEARS
          S/O.LONAPPAN, PEREPPADAN HOUSE,
          OMBATHUNGAL,KANJALIPPARA, MATTATHUR P.O.,
          THRISSUR DISTRICT.

    2     ELSY
          AGED 58 YEARS
          W/O.PAILAPPAN, ALAPADAN HOUSE, OMBATHUNGAL,
          MATTATHUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.

    3     SHAIJU K.V.
          AGED 37 YEARS
          S/O.VIJAYAN, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, OMBATHUNGAL
          KUNJALIPPARA, MATTATHUR P.O., THRISSURDISTRICT.

    4     PRABHAKARAN
          AGED 70 YEARS
          S/O.MANI, PORUMAMKULAM HOUSE,
          OMBATHUNGAL,KUNJALIPPARA, MATTATHUR P.O.,
          THRISSUR DISTRICT.

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD
         SMT.VINEETHA V.KUMAR



RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THE UNION OF INDIA
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
          GOVERNMENT,MINISTRY OF MINES, NEW DELHI - 110 001
 WP(C) NO. 7344 OF 2014
                            -2-




    2     THE STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
          GOVERNMENT,INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
          SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

    3     THE DIRECTOR OF MINES SAFETY
          BANGALORE - 560 002.

    4     THE DIRECTOR OF INDIAN BUREAU OF MINES
          GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NAGPUR - 440 001.

    5     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
          (THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE), THRISSUR-680 005

    6     THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER THRISSUR-680 005

    7     THE TAHSILDAR
          CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 005

    8     THE GEOLOGIST
          DISTRICT OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND
          GEOLOGY,THRISSUR-680 005

    9     THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
          KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
          DISTRICTOFFICE, 6TH FLOOR, SUN TOWER, EAST FORT
          P.O.,THRISSUR, PIN - 680 005.

    10    THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
          FOREST DEPARTMENT, CHALAKKUDY 680 005

    11    THE MATTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,MATTATHUR P.O.,
          PIN - 680 684.

    12    THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES
          KENDRIYA BHAVAN, BLOCK C-2, 3RD FLOOR,KAKKANAD
          P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 037.`
 WP(C) NO. 7344 OF 2014
                                -3-




    13      THE STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT
            ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
            ITSCHAIRMAN, PALLIMUKKU, PETTAH
            P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 024.

    14      E.N.SHAJAN
            MANAGING PARTNER, EDATHADAN
            GRANITES,OMBATHUNGAL, MATTATHUR P.O.,
            THRISSURDISTRICT, PIN - 680 684.

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA
          GOVERNMENT PLEADER
          ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
          SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SR.
          SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
          SRI. M.AJAY, SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL
          BOARD
          SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL



OTHER PRESENT:

            SNR.GP. SRI. JUSTIN JACOB




     THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   25.08.2021,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 7344 OF 2014
                                  -4-




                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner had challenged the mining activities of

the 14th respondent alleging it to be illegal. The contesting

respondent, the Panchayath and the Union of India had filed

detailed counter affidavits touching upon the merits of the

case. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is

submitted by all the learned counsel that the lease period

for mining activities has expired in 2018. In that view of the

matter nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. The

counsel for the petitioner submits that several contentions

were raised against the mining activities carried on and that

they may be granted liberty to question in case a fresh permit

is granted in future in violation of the relevant laws. Liberty is

granted .

This writ petition is closed as infructuous.

sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE STK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter