Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16424 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 20508 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
NARAYANANKUTTY M.G.
AGED 69 YEARS,
S/O. LATE GOPALA MENON P.R.,
PAINKAL HOUSE, KOODAPPUZHA,
CHALAKUDY.P.O., THRISSUR,
CHALAKUDY, KERALA, PIN-680307.
BY ADVS.
P.VISWANATHAN (SR.)
SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN
SHRI. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL
SHRI.BALRAM S.A.
SRI.SHIBU JOSEPH
SRI.SHAJU AUGUSTINE AKKARA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE CHALKUDY MUNICIPALITY,
CHALAKUDY.P.O., THRISSUR, PIN CODE- 680307,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECREARY.
2 INDUS TOWERS LTD,
8TH FLOOR, VANKARATH TOWERS,
COCHIN, N.H BYPASS, PALARIVATTOM,
EDAPPALLY.P.O.,
ERNAKULAM, PINCODE-682024.
Addl.3 THE SECRETARY,
CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY,
CHALAKUDY.P.O.,
THRISSUR, PINCODE-680307.
(ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 27-10-2020
IN IA 1/2020).
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR
SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW
SRI.ARUN THOMAS
SMT.BINDU SREEDHAR
SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN
SHRI.ASIF N
SRI.VIJAY V. PAUL
SMT.KARTHIKA MARIA
WP(C).No.20508/2020
2
SMT.VEENA RAVEENDRAN
SRI.ANIL SEBASTIAN PULICKEL
SMT.DIVYA SARA GEORGE
SMT.JAISY ELZA JOE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.20508/2020
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of August, 2021
The petitioner has approached this Court alleging
that a telecommunication tower is constructed by the 2 nd
respondent violating Ext.P3 Building Permit.
2. The specific allegation of the petitioner is that the
building was permitted to be constructed on the northern side
of Anamala-Athirappilly road, but the 2nd respondent has
constructed the telecommunication tower on the southern side.
Therefore, there is a violation of permit condition.
3. The counsel for the respondent stoutly denied the
allegation and stated that the telecommunication tower has
been constructed following the permit conditions and even if
some minor deviation from the approved plan has occurred, it WP(C).No.20508/2020
is condonable and can be regularised as per Rule 17 of the
Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999.
4. Going through the pleadings in the writ petition, I
find that the issue has been earlier brought to the
consideration of the District Telecommunication Committee
and the District Telecommunication Committee has permitted
the 2nd respondent to erect the telecommunication tower.
5. However, since the grievance raised by the
petitioner is as regards violation of conditions in Building
Permit and since the petitioner has preferred Ext.P9
representation before the Secretary to the Municipality, this
Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met if the
Secretary, Chalakudy Municipality is directed to consider the
representation and pass appropriate orders thereon in
accordance with law.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
directing the additional 3rd respondent-Secretary, Chalakudy
Municipality to consider Ext.P9 representation in accordance WP(C).No.20508/2020
with law. Needless to say the representation shall be
considered with notice to the petitioner and the 2 nd respondent
and after hearing them. A decision in this regard shall be
taken by the 3rd respondent, within a period of two months.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR WP(C).No.20508/2020
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20508/2020
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 25/06/2019 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LOCAL PLAN DATED 19/06/2019.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT DATED 16/07/2019. EXHIBIT P3(A) THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR DATED 07/05/2020. EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/08/2019 SUBMITTED BY THE RESIDENTS INCLUDING PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DECISION TAKEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26/08/2019.
EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6(A) THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF NOTICE DATED
13/03/2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 THE COMMISSION REPORT IN OS NO.144/2020
IN THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHALAKUDY.
EXHIBIT P7(A) THE ROUGH SKETCH PREPARED IN OS NO.144/2020 IN THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHALAKUDY.
EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 31/07/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P9 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 05/11/2020, SUBMITTED BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
WP(C).No.20508/2020
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT TELECOM COMMITTEE DATED 22-01-2020 EXHIBIT R2(B) TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28-01-2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND THE RECEIPT FOR ACKNOWLEDGING THE SAME BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY EXHIBIT R2(C) TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE MEETING EXHIBIT R2(D) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 4-3-2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY EXHIBIT R2(E) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(c) NO.7128/2020 DATED 9-3-2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT EXHIBIT R2(F) TRUE COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 27-3-2020 IN I.A.NO.1/2020 IN O.S. NO.144/2020 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHALAKKUDY EXHIBIT R2(G) TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLETION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE MUNICIPALITY, DATED 10.8.2020 EXHIBIT R2(H) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITY DATED 21-8-2020 EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF EXT.R2(G)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!