Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. K.P. Lakshmanan vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 16416 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16416 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Shri. K.P. Lakshmanan vs The State Of Kerala on 5 August, 2021
WP(C) NO. 7049 OF 2021         1

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
   THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
                     WP(C) NO. 7049 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

          SHRI. K.P. LAKSHMANAN,
          AGED 55 YEARS,
          S/O.K.K.KUTTYAPPA NAIR, RESIDING AT 'SRISHTI, NEAR
          CCSM LTD, P.O. CHOVVA, KANNUR - 670006.

          BY ADVS.
          S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
          SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE
          SRI.P.PRIJITH
          SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
          SRI.R.GITHESH
          SRI.AJAY BEN JOSE
          SRI.MANJUNATH MENON
          SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN S.



RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THE STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS
          DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
          COLLECTORATE ROAD, THAVAKKARA, KANNUR - 670002.

    3     THE CHIEF ENGINEER(ROADS),
          PWD, ADMINISTRATION AND ROADS AND BRIDGES, PALAYAM,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.

    4     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
          ROADS DIVISION, PWD, KANNUR - 670002.
 WP(C) NO. 7049 OF 2021         2



    5     THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
          PWD ROADS SUB - DIVISION, KANNUR - 670002.




          SMT K AMMINIKUTTY, SR GP




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 7049 OF 2021                  3




                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner owns property having an extent of 3.49 Ares in Sy. No.

141/2 of Kannur Taluk. He has put up a residential building therein and is

residing with his family.

2. The grievance of the petitioner concerns the alignment of the

proposed construction of a new road from Thaze Chovva Railway Gate to

Chovva Cooperative Spinning Mill. The petitioner contends that due to

political influence exerted by certain interested persons, the alignment has

been changed. If the road is constructed along the present alignment, it

would bisect the property of the petitioner. In the said circumstances and

narrating his grievances, the petitioner had preferred Ext.P7 representation

before the 4th respondent. Later, he approached this Court and filed W.P.

(C) No.22676 of 2020. By judgment dated 19.11.2020, the writ petition was

disposed of by this Court directing the Executive Engineer, Roads Division

to take a decision on Ext.P7 representation submitted by the petitioner

within a period of eight weeks, after hearing the petitioner.

3. On 7.1.2021, Ext.P9 notice was issued to the petitioner asking him

to appear on 13.1.2021. However, as the petitioner was at Itanagar in

Arunachal Pradesh, he sent Ext.P10 letter by e-mail requesting that the

date of hearing be deferred to 25.1.2021. The 4th respondent ignored

Ext.P10 and issued Ext.P11 communication rejecting the request.

Immediately thereafter, the petitioner submitted Ext.P12 pointing out all

these aspects. Finally, by Ext.P14, the 4th respondent informed the

petitioner that no change can be made to the alignment. It is in the

aforesaid background that the petitioner is before this Court seeking to

quash Ext.P6, P6(a) to (c) and for a further direction to the 4th respondent

to dispose of Ext.P7 after affording an opportunity to the petitioner.

4. I have heard Sri. Martin Jose, the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner.

5. The learned Government Pleader submitted that enough

opportunities were granted to the petitioner, but he did not avail of the

same.

6. I have considered the submissions. It is undisputed that the

petitioner was not heard before Ext.P11 communication was issued

pursuant to Ext.P8 judgement issued by this Court. From Ext.P10 it is

evident that the petitioner was not in station and he had sent an email in

advance seeking hearing on another day. Instead of granting the petitioner

an opportunity to advance his contentions, Ext.P11 decision was taken.

Having considered the entire facts, I am of the considered opinion that the

4th respondent can be directed to consider the matter afresh after affording

the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

7. In that view of the matter, there will be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent on 24.8.2021 on which day

the 4th respondent shall hear the petitioner on Exhibit P7 and take a fresh

decision in accordance with the law.

This writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V,

JUDGE NS

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7049/2021

PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO. 4330 OF 1996 DATED 24.12.1996.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 16.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 22.09.2020 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF INITIAL PLAN FROM CH.OM TO CH.475M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF INITIAL PLAN FROM CH 475M TO CH 794.31M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF FINAL PLAN FROM CH.OM TO CH.802/245M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P6(A) TRUE COPY OF FINAL PLAN FROM CH.OM TO CH.375M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P6(B) TRUE COPY OF FINAL PLAN FROM CH.50M TO CH.475M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P6(C) TRUE COPY OF FINAL PLAN FROM CH.475M TO CH.802/245M OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 08.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER

BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 19.11.2020 IN WP(C) NO. 22676 OF 2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 07.01.2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF EMAIL DATED 11.01.2021 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. A2/6612/2020 DATED 13/01/2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 19.01.2021 TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 28.01.2021.

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. A2-6612/2020 DATED 20.01.2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. A2-6612/2020 DATED 06.02.2021 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter