Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Sudhakaran Pillai vs The Local Level Monitoring ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16100 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16100 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
N.Sudhakaran Pillai vs The Local Level Monitoring ... on 3 August, 2021
WA.No.1152 OF 2014                 1




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR

                                       &

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

           TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1943

                             WA NO. 1152 OF 2014

  AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 11609/2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM

APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

     1      N.SUDHAKARAN PILLAI
            AGED 62 YEARS
            S/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA @ KAMALAMMA, CHERATTU HOUSE, CHOORNIKKARA
            GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AMBATTUKAVU, ALUVA-683106 - EXPIRED
     2      N.A.ASHRAF
            NJARAKKATT VEEDU, ELOOR KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM, NOW RESIDING AT
            CHIRAKKAL HOUSE, ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, ALUVA.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY
            SRI.H.KIRAN


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

     1      THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
            CHOORNIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER AND
            AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, CHOORNIKKARA, ERNAKULAM-
            683106.
     2      THE VILLAGE OFFICER
            ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, BYPASS ROAD, ALUVA-683101.
     3      CHOORNIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHOORNIKKARA, THAIKKATTUKARA,
            ALUVA-683106.
     4      THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
            KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER &
            AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, ELOOR-683501.
     5      VILLAGE OFFICER
            THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KOONAMTHAI, KALAMASSERY,
            COCHIN-682021.
     6      KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY,
            KALAMASSERY, COCHIN-683104.
     7      THE ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLLY
            REPRESENTED BY THE ARCHBISHOP OF VERAPOLLY, ARCHDIOCESE OF
            VERAPOLLY, BROADWAY, COCHIN-682031.
     8      STATE OF KERALA
 WA.No.1152 OF 2014               2



           REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT,
           GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695007.
     9     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
           CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682030.
    10     THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
           OFFICE OF RDO, FORT COCHIN, COCHIN-682001.
    11     KOCHI METOR RAIL LTD.
           A GOVERNMENT COMPANY, REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ELIAS GEORGE IAS, KOCHI
           METRO RAIL LTD., REVENUE TOWER, 8TH FLOOR, OPP: SUBHASH PARK,
           COCHIN-682011.
    12     THE DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.
           A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, REPRESENTED BY THE
           MANAGING DIRECTOR, DMRCL, METRO BHAVAN, FIVE BRIDGE LANE,
           PARAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001.
    13     THE STATE LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
           KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CONVENER, THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
           COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
           COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM-695001.
           BY ADVS.
           SRI.K.ANAND (SR.)
           SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED
           SRI.K.JAJU BABU SR.
           SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
           SRI.T.P.SAJAN
           SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR TR
           SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SC, KOCHI METRO RAIL LTD.

           SRI.TEK CHAND, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1, R2, R4, R5, R8
           TO R10
           SRI.M.ABOOBACKER FOR R6.



     THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.08.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WA.No.1152 OF 2014                      3



                                     JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2021

S. MANIKUMAR,CJ.

This appeal is preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.11609/2014,

challenging judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 26.6.2014, by which a

learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by declining the following

reliefs sought for by the appellants:

a) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing Exhibits P21 and P22 orders issued by the Agricultural Production Commissioner in the name of the 8th respondent.

b). Issue a writ, order or prohibition or direction, prohibiting the respondents from converting, filling up or leveling or allowing the conversion or filling up of the paddy lands and wet lands comprised in Chawarpadam and the Katteppadam in Choornikkara Grama Panchayath, and Pallathippadam in Kalamassery Municipality.

C) A writ order or direction, directing respondents 8 to 10 to forthwith stop all further conversion of paddy land and wet land on the basis of Exhibit P13 application forthwith.

d) Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the 13th respondent to remove all the soil dumped by it in the Chawarpadam and the Katteppadam in Choornikkara Grama Panchayath in excess of land covered by Exhibits P21 and P22 orders

e) A writ , order or direction to identify puramboke land in Sy.No.1087/1G of Thrikkakara North Village forthwith and to take possession of the same, invoking emergently clauses, for the purpose of Metro Railway Projects an

any ancillary structures required for the purpose, on war footing within a time period specified by this Hon'ble Court.

2. After considering the pleadings and submissions, and also the

judgment of the Apex Court in Sundarrajan v. Union of India and others

[(2013) 6 SCC 620], writ court declined to grant the reliefs prayed for. At

paragraph 19, the writ court held as follows:

"19. Having regard to the law laid down by the Supreme Court, it is clear

that, this is also a project for importance to the State as it is intended for

increasing the infrastructural facilities in the city of Kochi and the State as

well and therefore the project cannot be stalled by raising unnecessary

controversies. True that there might be some infirmities in the decision

making process. But such infirmities or even to certain extent illegalities

should not be a reason to forget or discard the public interest or public

purpose involved in the matter. Personal opinions, private interest, trivial

issues, minimal damages to the environment should always give way to

larger public interest.

In the said circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with

the project at this stage of the proceedings and accordingly, the writ

petition is dismissed."

Being aggrieved, the instant writ appeal is filed.

3. On this day, when the matter came up for further hearing, Mr.Jaju

Babu, learned Senior counsel for 11th respondent, submitted that the project

itself has been completed and Metro Rail Project has been inaugurated on

17.6.2017. According to him, nothing survives in this writ appeal for further

adjudication.

Placing on record the above, instant writ appeal is dismissed.

Sd/-

S.MANIKUMAR

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

                                                  SHAJI P.CHALY

smv                                                    JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter