Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15967 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021
OP(C) No.387/2021 1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
Monday, the 2nd day of August 2021 / 11th Sravana, 1943
OP(C) NO. 387 OF 2021
OS 14/2014 OF SUB COURT, KASARAGOD.
PETITIONER (PLAINTIFF):
K.M.AHAMED NIZAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. LATE T.B.KUNHIMAHIN HAJI,
RESIDING AT PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O, CHATTANCHAL, KASARAGOD,NOW
RESIDING AT FLAT NO.504, KRISHVI LAPALMA APARTMENT,
68/B,JOGHUPALAYA, MAIN ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008, KARNATAKA
STATE
BY ADVOCATES: S.VINOD BHAT, M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED,ANAGHA LAKSHMY RAMAN
& GREESHMA CHANDRIKA.R.
RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS 1 TO 5:
1. S.L.KUNHIBI, AGED 72 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE T.B.KUNHI MAHIN HAJI,
PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD,PIN-671 541.
2. SMT.THAHIRA ALI, AGED 55 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE T.B.KUNHI MAHIN
HAJI, PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD,PIN-671 541.
3. MOHAMMED SHERIEF KUNHI MAHIN, AGED 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE T.B.KUNHI
MAHIN HAJI, PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD,PIN-671 541.
4. KUNHIMAHIN MOIDHEEN KUNHI, AGED 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE T.B.KUNHI
MAHIN HAJI, PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD,PIN-671 541.
5. SMT.ARIFA KUNHI MAHIN, AGED 43 YEARS, D/O.LATE T.B.KUNHI MAHIN HAJI,
PADHOOR HOUSE, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD,PIN-671 541
R1-5 BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
R1-5 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.AKHIL
This OP (Civil) having come up for orders on 2/8/2021 upon perusing
the letter dated 22-06-2021 from sub judge,kasargod and this court's
Judgment dated 08-04-2021 and the court on the same day passed the
following.
[PTO]
OP(C) No.387/2021 2/3
V.G.ARUN, J.
...................................................................
O.P (C) No. 387 of 2021
.....................................................................
Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2021
ORDER
This is a letter from the Subordinate Judge,
Kasaragode seeking extension of the time limit fixed by this
Court for disposal of I.A Nos. 2 of 2020, 5 of 2020 & 6 of
2020 in F.D.I.A. No. 1 of 2020 in O.S No. 14 of 2014. By
judgment dated 8.4.2021 in O.P(C) No. 387 of 2021, this
Court had directed the Court below to dispose the
applications within one month of reopening of the Court
after summer vacation. In the letter dated 22.06.2021, the
learned Sub Judge has stated that notice is yet to be served
on 18 respondents and process for securing their presence
is not completed. Hence, five more months time will be
required for disposing the matter.
2.Learned counsel on either side submits that draft
paper publication for effecting service on the 18
respondents has been produced and the service in all
respondents will be completed in a short while. According
to the counsel, it will be possible for the learned judge to OP(C) No.387/2021 3/3
dispose the application in a month's time. Having
considered the report, the submissions of the learned
counsel and taking into account of the intervening Onam
holidays, the time stipulated for disposing the interlocutory
application is extended by a further period of two months.
The learned Sub Judge shall take earnest efforts to dispose
the applications within the extended time limit.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
SJ
02-08-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!