Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saraswathi Amma vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 15917 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15917 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Saraswathi Amma vs State Of Kerala on 2 August, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
  MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1943
                     WP(C) NO. 23408 OF 2011
PETITIONER:

            SARASWATHI AMMA
            W/O.LATE N.KESAVAN NAIR, POKKATT
            HOUSE,NOOLELIKARA, ASHAMANNOOR
            VILLAGE,KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
            BY ADV SRI.A.C.DEVASIA

RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,GOVERNMENT,
            SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
    2       THE DISTRICT COLLECTORERNAKULAM
            CAMP OFFICE,CIVIL LANES,KAKKANAD,687 030.
    3       THE TAHSILDARKUNNATHUNADU TALUK OFFICE
            PERUMBAVOOR,ERNAKULAM 683 542.
    4       THE VILLAGE OFFICER ASHAMANNOOR VILLAGE
            ASHAMANNOOR,KOTTAPPADY - PERUMBAVOOR 683 542.
    5       THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RESURVEY
            OFFICE OF THE RESURVEY SUPERINTENDENT,, ALUVA 683
            103.
    6       DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT
            OFFICE OF THE SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT,, CIVIL
            LANES,KAKKAND,ERNAKULAM 682 030.
    7       AMMINIKUTTYWO.LATE RAGHAVAN NAIR
            POKKATT HOUSE,NOOLELIKARA,ASHAMANNOOR VILLAGE,
            KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 541.
            BY ADV SRI.B.JAYASANKAR

OTHER PRESENT:

            SMT.MABLE.C.KURIAN, SR.GP


     THIS     WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME   UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   02.08.2021,    THE     COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).No.23408/2011

                                   2


                    P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                      -------------------------------
                    W.P.(C).No.23408 of 2011
              ----------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 02nd day of August, 2021


                            JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions commanding the respondents 2 to 6 to rectify the mistakes crept in the resurvey records in Block No. 14, of Ashamannoor Village, comprised in resurvey No. 390/10, 390/19, 390/20 (old survey No. 225/2) in respect of D Schedule Item No. 3 in Ext.P1 title deed.

ii. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions commanding the respondents 2 to 6 to survey and demarcate the property on the basis of D schedule in Item No.3 shown in Ext. P1.

Iii. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions commanding the respondents 2 to 6 to allow the petitioner to remit the tax in respect of the property of D schedule in Item No. 3 shown in Ext. P1, on the basis of Ext. P2 Thandapper Account. W.P.(C).No.23408/2011

iv. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions commanding the respondents 2, 3, 5 & 6 to consider Ext. P3 representation submitted before them by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.

v. to issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper as per the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Today, when this writ petition came up for

consideration, the counsel for the 7 th respondent takes me

through the counter affidavit filed by the 7 th respondent.

Relevant portion of the counter affidavit of the 7 th respondent

is extracted hereunder:

"The above writ petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. Admittedly a fully fledged Civil Suit was filed as O.S.No.168/03 on the files of the Munsiff Court Perumbavoor for fixation of boundary and for prohibitory injunction with respect to the property in dispute as against the parties to Exhibit P1 partition deed on the very same allegations raised in the above writ petition. The said suit was tried along with O.S.No.99/01 filed by this respondent as against the petitioner herein and Krishnan Nair the 5 th defendant W.P.(C).No.23408/2011

in O.S. No. 168/03. After a full fledged trial the learned Munsiff dismissed both the suits. Dissatisfied with the judgment and decree in O.S.168/2003, the petitioner herein filed as appeal as A.S. No. 79/2009 on the files of the Sub Court Perumbavoor. Pending the above appeal the petitioner has approached this Hon'ble Court by way of filing the above Writ Petition as an experimental venture. The attempt of the petitioner was to see as to whether she can create evidence to short circuit the issues pending consideration before the Civil Court. The Appeal Suit A.S. No. 79/ 2009 was also dismissed by the learned Sub Judge by judgment dated 4/1/2012. A true copy of the certified copy of the decree dated 4-1-2012 in A.S.No. 79/ 2009 is produced herewith which may be marked as Exhibit.R7 (a).

6. Thereafter the petitioner has filed yet another suit as O.S.No.1173/2012 on the files of the Munsiff Court Perumbavoor on the very same allegations with a prayer to recover possession of the same land and for other reliefs. The allegation in paragraph 3 of the writ petition that due to the mistake in resurvey records the petitioners 1,08 Acres of land is included in resurvey No.390/10 and 390/19 and the extent shown is 52 cents instead of 1,08 Acres is only a distorted version of fact and hence denied. It is equally false to say that the mistake has crept in due to misrepresentation made by me and my family members."

W.P.(C).No.23408/2011

3. In the light of the above averments in the counter

affidavit, no relief can be granted in this writ petition at this

distance of time. The writ petition was filed in the year 2011.

After this writ petition came up for admission on 29.08.2011,

the case was posted only on one occasion. Today also it was

posted in the defect list because service to the 4 th respondent

is not complete. The 4th respondent is a government official

and the Government Pleader took notice for the 4th

respondent. According to me no relief can be granted in this

writ petition at this distance of time since there is a decree

from the civil court.

Therefore this writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

                                        P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JV                                             JUDGE
 W.P.(C).No.23408/2011






                APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23408/2011


PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1          TRUE COPY OF HTE PARTITION DEED DATED
                    06.03.1964
EXHIBIT P2          TRUE COPY OF THANDAPER ACCOUNT KEPT IN

THE VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 30.07.2007 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF HTE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.06.2011, FIVE IN NUMBERS GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENTS BY THE PETITIONER

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R7(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 4.1.2012 IN AS NO 79/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE SUB JUDGE PERUMBAVOOR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter