Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12141 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 30TH CHAITHRA, 1943
Crl.MC.No.1983 OF 2021(G)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LP 9/2003 IN CP NO.46/2001 OF THE
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, MANJERI
IN CRIME NO.742/1998 OF MANJERI POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER / ACCUSED:
MUHAMMED RAFI,
AGED 41 YEARS,
S/O. ALAVIKUTTY,
PRAPOYIL, HOUSE,
KUTTASSERI,
ELANKOOR P.O.
ERNADU TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.SAMSUDIN
SRI.M.ANUROOP
RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM - 682 031
(CRIME NO. 742/1998 OF MANJERI POLICE STATION).
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP - SRI. K.B.UDAYAKUMAR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.1983 OF 2021(G)
2
ORDER
Dated this the 20th day of April, 2021
This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, by the 9 th
accused in Crime No.742/1998 of Manjeri Police Station, which was
registered alleging offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148,
324, 427 r/w Section 149 IPC and also 3(i)(x) of Scheduled Caste and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during
committal stage the petitioner had gone abroad and could not
participate the trial proceedings. When the matter came before the
Special Court and taken up as SC No.185/2002, the charge was
withdrawn and the accused were acquitted under Section 321 Cr.P.C.
The learned Counsel invited my pointed attention to Annexure A3
order of the Sessions Court, Manjeri in SC No.185/2002 dated
01.09.2006.
3. I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also the
learned Senior Public Prosecutor. According to the learned Senior
Public Prosecutor, the case against the petitioner is pending as LP Crl.MC.No.1983 OF 2021(G)
No.9/2003 before Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Manjeri. It
seems that, by way of the practice at vogue, at that time such cases
required committal to the Special Court.
4. Anyhow, it is certain that, had the petitioner been present
before the committal court, he would have been benefited by the order
of withdrawal. All the accused persons stand exonerated by the
Special Court. In the light of the fact that the matter stood withdrawn
from prosecution by virtue of Annexure A3, the order of the Special
Judge, there is no purpose in proceeding the matter further. Therefore,
all proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to Annexure A2 final
report shall stand quashed.
The Cr.M.C. is allowed as above.
Sd/-
K.HARIPAL JUDGE
NR/20/04/2021 Crl.MC.No.1983 OF 2021(G)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
742/1998 OF MANJERI POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL IN CRIME NO. 742/1998 OF MANJERI POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01.09.2006 IN CRL.M.P. NO. 671/2006 IN SC NO.
185/2002 OF THE SESSIONS COURT MANJERI.
// TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!