Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12074 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943
Crl.MC.No.1564 OF 2021(E)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 716/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS -I,HOSDRUG
CRIME NO.240/2017 OF Rajapuram Police Station , Kasargod
PETITIONERS / ACCUSED:
1 SARATHKUMAR.T.S
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. SASIKUMAR,
R/AT. THANATHINGAL HOUSE,
CHERUPANATHADY,
PANATHADY VILLAGE,
VELLARIKKUND TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
2 RISHIKESH @ APPU
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. GANGADHARAN,
R/A.MADATHIL HOUSE,
CHERUPANATHADY,
PANATHADY VILLAGE,
VELLARIKKUND TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
3 VIKRU @ VIGNESH
AGED 23 YEARS
S/O. GANGADHARAN,
R/A. MADATHIL HOUSE,
CHERUPANATHADY,
PANATHADY VILLAGE,
VELLARIKKUND TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
BY ADV. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENTS / STATE & COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 31.
Crl.MC.No.1564 OF 2021(E)
2
2 SREEKANTH A.S.
S/O. SREEDHARAN, R/A.ANIKKUZHIYIL HOUSE, KOLAPURAM,
PANATHADY VILLAGE, VELLARIKKUND TALUK, KASARAGOD
DISTRICT.
R2 BY ADV. VIPIN T JOSE
GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI KAMMAPPU
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.1564 OF 2021(E)
3
ORDER
Dated this the 16th day of April 2021
Petitioners are the accused in C.C. No.716/2018 pending
on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Hosdurg,
arising out of Crime No.240/2017 of Rajapuram Police Station,
Kasargode District, for having allegedly committed the offences
punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 r/w 34 of IPC.
2. The de facto complainant-injured is respondent 2
herein, who has appeared through Adv.Vipin.T.Jose. The de
facto complainant has filed an affidavit as Annexure AIII stating
that the matter has been amicably settled and that he has no
existing grievance against the petitioners. The offences alleged
are purely personal in nature and no serious prejudice will be
caused to the public if the settlement is recognised. Further,
possibility of the case ending in conviction is also very remote,
if not impossible, due to the said settlement. Recognising the
said settlement augurs better in the interests of all.
3. Reliance can be placed on the decisions in Gian
Singh v. State of Punjab [2012 (4) KLT 108 ], Narinder Crl.MC.No.1564 OF 2021(E)
Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6
SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of
Jharkhand [(2014) 9 SCC 653] for recognising the settlement
entered into by the parties.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the
petitioners and respondent, the petitioners are entitled to get
the proceedings quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. It is
also pertinent to note that the petitioners do not have any
criminal antecedents and no public interest is involved.
In the result, the Crl.M.C. is allowed and the entire
proceedings as against the petitioners in C.C. No.716/2018,
pending on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I,
Hosdurg, arising out of Crime No.240/2017 of Rajapuram
Police Station, Kasargode District, are quashed under Section
482 of the Cr.P.C.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE SMF Crl.MC.No.1564 OF 2021(E)
APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.
240 OF 2017 OF RAJAPURAM POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 240 OF 2017 OF RAJAPURAM POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE AIII THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!