Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11962 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.9221 OF 2021(C)
PETITIONER/S:
ELOOKARA SERVICE CO OEPRATIVE BANK LTD.
NO.1765, ELOOKARA, P.O.MUPPATHADAM, ALUVA,
ERNAKULAM-683 110, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
BENNAKUMARI.K.S.
BY ADVS.
DR.K.P.PRADEEP
SHRI.HAREESH M.R.
SRI.T.T.BIJU
SMT.T.THASMI
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI-110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
2 INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2,
AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX,
KAP COMMERCIAL COMPLEX,
O/O ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
ALUVA RANGE, R.S.ROAD, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683 101
3 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE,
PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM-682 036
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.9221 OF 2021(C) ..2..
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of April 2021
The petitioner is a Co-operative Society and a primary
Agricultural Credit Society, registered under the provisions of
the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The petitioner is
aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order wherein, the claim of
the petitioner for deduction under Section 80(p) of the Income
Tax Act is denied. Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order, the
petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 statutory appeal before the 3 rd
respondent. However, the 2nd respondent is taking coercive
steps to recover the amount demanded in Ext.P1 assessment
order. According to the petitioner, the eligibility of the
petitioner for deduction under Section 80(p) of the Income Tax
Act is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner
of Income Tax reported in [2021(1) KHC 303]. The
counsel for the petitioner also relied on the common judgment
of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8610 of 2021 and connected cases WP(C).No.9221 OF 2021(C) ..3..
wherein, this Court, taking note of the decision in Mavilayi
Service Co-operaitve Bank's case (supra) directed the
Commissioner of Income Tax to consider and dispose of the
statutory appeals filed by the Co-operative Societies therein,
and till then not to proceed with recovery steps .
2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel
for the respondents.
3. In the light of the judgments referred to above, there
will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass
orders on Ext.P2 appeal, expeditiously and till then the
respondents are directed to keep the recovery proceedings
pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN,
JUDGE
SB
WP(C).No.9221 OF 2021(C) ..4..
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER
NO.AAABT3684M/2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 28.01.2020 FOR THE YEAR 2018-19
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED ON 10.02.2020 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN EXT P2 APPEAL
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.AAABT3684M/2017-18 DATED 30.12.2019 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.AAABT3684M/2017-198 DATED 24.03.2021 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18
//true copy //
P.A to Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!