Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

For Information Purpose Only vs Sushanth C.M.
2021 Latest Caselaw 11875 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11875 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2021

Kerala High Court
For Information Purpose Only vs Sushanth C.M. on 9 April, 2021
Con.Case(C) 724/2021                       1/4

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        Present:
                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                           &
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
                               th                    th
                Friday,the 9 day of April 2021/19 Chaithra, 1943
              Contempt Case(C) No.724/2021 (S) in WP(C) No.30990/2016



1.
            For information purpose only
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 14, 45, 50 AND 68
        SUSHANTH C.M., AGED 60 YEARS,
        S/O.LATE C.M.INDRAN, SENIOR PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST,
        CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT,
        P.F.ACCOUNT NO.KR/KKD/4938/250, 7D, BRIDGE TOWER APARTMENTS,
        NADAKAVU P.O. - 673006.
2.      P. JAYAKUMAR, AGED 60 YEARS,
        S/O.LATE R.PUSHKARAN, SENIOR PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST,
        CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT,
        P.F.ACCOUNT NO.KR/KKD/4938/263, SAIKRIPA, NTMC ROAD (LANEII),
        KAVOOR, KOZHIKODE - 673017.
3.      REGHUNADHAN C., AGED 59 YEARS,
        S/O.LATE M.K.PANICKER, DEPUTY REGISTRAR,
        CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT,
        PF ACCOUNT NO.KR/KKD/4938/244, LAVANYAM, CHEVARAMBALAM P.O.,
        KOZHIKODE - 673017.
4.      K. REMADEVI, AGED 59 YEARS,
        W/O.V.EASWARAN POTTI (L) OFFICE ATTENDANT,
        CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT,
        KR/KKD/4938/327, UAN.100312604614, KARINGAMANNAILLAM,
        THAMARASSERY P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673573.

        BY ADVOCATES M/S R.SANJITH & C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3
1.      SUNIL BARTHWAL,THE CHIEF PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER,
        THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION,
        BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, 14, BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE,
        NEW DELHI - 110066.

2.      N. RAJANNA,
        REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
        THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION,
        KOZHIKODE - 673001.

ADVOCATE SRI. SAJEEV KUMAR.K.GOPAL, STANDING COUNSEL FOR EPFO

     This Contempt of Court Case (Civil) having come up for orders on
09/04/2021, the Court on the same day passed the following:-

                                                                     P.T.O.
 Con.Case(C) 724/2021      2/4




            For information purpose only
            ALEXANDER THOMAS & K.BABU, JJ.
                ------------------------------------
             Contempt Case (C) No.724 of 2021
                                  in
                 W.P(C) No.30990 of 2016
                 ------------------------------------
              Dated this the 9th day of April, 2021
        For information
                  ORDER

purpose only It is submitted by Sri.Sajeev Kumar.K.Gopal, learned Standing

Counsel for the EPFO on the basis of instructions that, EPFO had

preferred SLP to challenge the impugned judgment dated 12-10-2018

rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P(C) No.602/2015

and connected cases and that earlier EPFO had filed application to

review and recall the orders passed by the Apex Court dismissing the

SLPs preferred by EPFO against the judgments in these writ petitions

and later the Apex Court after hearing both sides had passed orders

recalling the orders dismissing the SLP and had posted SLPs for

rehearing. That subsequently the Apex Court has passed order dated

25-02-2021, ordering inter alia therein that, pending further

consideration of those matters by the Apex Court, no contempt

applications seeking implementation of any of the orders passed in

the category of cases being considered by the Apex Court therein

shall be taken up by any Court, etc. Further it is pointed out that the

said matters are likely to be taken up by the Apex Court without COC (C) No.724 of 2021 in W.P(C) No.30990 of 2016

much delay, etc.

2. Having regard to these aspects, it is not proper for this Court For information purpose only to consider these contempt petitions. However, the learned Advocate

appearing for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the

respondent EPFO may file a Memo before the Registry as soon as the

Apex Court either passes orders vacating the abovesaid interim

orders or passes orders disposing of the abovesaid pending matters,

etc.

List this case when moved again along with connected

contempt petitions, viz,. COC (C) No.516 of 2021, COC (C) No.518 of

2021, COC (C) No.519 of 2021, COC(C) No.525 of 2021, COC (C)

No.536 of 2021, COC (C) No.543 of 2021, COC (C) No.559 of 2021,

COC (C) No.560 of 2021, COC (C) No.566 of 2021, COC (C) No.601 of

2021 and any other connected cases.

Hand over to both sides.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

                                                  K.BABU, JUDGE
KAS




                                  /true copy/     Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter