Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manikanta Sports Club Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2463 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2463 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Manikanta Sports Club Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552
                                                    WP No. 201282 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 201282 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE)


                   BETWEEN:

                   MANIKANTA SPORTS CLUB PVT LTD,
                   SY NO.575, ASHRAYA COLONY ROAD, HALLISAGAR
                   SHAPUR, DIST. YADGIR 585223,
                   THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
                   RAYAPPA SALIMANI S/O BHEEMARAYA SALIMANI,
                   AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: MANAGING DIRECTOR,
                   R/O NEAR KALAMMA KATTI, GUTTIPETHA ONI,
                   SHAHPUR DIST. YADGIR-585223.

                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI MAHADEV S. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed
by SWETA
KULKARNI           1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                THROUGH HOME DEPARTMENT,
KARNATAKA
                        BENGALURU.

                   2.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                        YADGIR-585201.

                   3.   THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                        YADGIR-585201.

                   4.   THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/
                        POLICE INSPECTOR, SHAHPUR-585223.
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552
                                      WP No. 201282 of 2026


 HC-KAR




5.   THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
     SHAHPUR-585223.

                                              ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR M., AGA )

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, A)
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF PROHIBITION OR ANY
OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER, PROHIBITING THE
RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5 FROM INTERFERING IN THE DAY TO
DAY AFFAIRS OF THE PETITIONER CLUB; B) ISSUE A WRIT IN
THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
WRIT OR ORDER, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5
NOT TO INSIST /COMPEL THE PETITIONER CLUB TO SECURE A
LICENSE FOR THE LEGAL ACTIVITIES OF THE CLUB AS
MENTIONED ABOVE PROPERTY ALL YEAR THAT A PROPERLY
SHORT PERIOD IN THE NATURE OF PARTITION.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                        ORAL ORDER

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India is filed seeking for the following

reliefs :

"A) Issue a writ in the nature of prohibition or any other appropriate writ or order, prohibiting the respondent No.2 to 5 from interfering in the day to day affairs of the petitioner club;

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552

HC-KAR

B) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing the respondent No.2 to 5 not to insist /compel the petitioner club to secure a license for the legal activities of the club as mentioned above property all year that a properly short period in the nature of partition."

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for

respondents.

3. The issue involved in this writ petition is

covered by the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of

this Court in W.P.No.203278/2024 disposed of on

25.11.2024. The learned counsels for the parties submit

that this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the

order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in

the light of the order passed in W.P.No.203278/2024 on

the following terms and conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall install CCTV

cameras at the places of access to its members

and also at all the places, where in game(s) is/are

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552

HC-KAR

played by the members within a period of six

weeks. The CCTV footage of at least prior 15 days

period shall be made available by the petitioner to

the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon

to do so.

(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity

card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be

produced by the member(s), when called upon by

the concerned police, during the raid(s),

surveillance, etc.,

(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-

member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s) to

make use of its premises for the purpose of

playing any kind of game(s) or recreational

activities.

(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any

activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in

acts of amusement, falling within the definition of

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552

HC-KAR

Sections 2(14) and 2(15) of the Act and shall not

permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation

(II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka

Police Act, 1863. The member(s) shall not be

allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes

or make any profit or gain out of the

game(s)played.

(v) The petitioner shall put proper

mechanism in place and shall ensure that no

game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the

member(s). If the jurisdictional police find the

game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in

violation of the settled practice, it is open to them

to take action against the petitioner and the

offenders, in accordance with law.

(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have

liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on

receipt of any information about any unlawful

activity being carried on in the petitioner's

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2552

HC-KAR

premises.

(vii) The respondents are directed not to

interfere with the lawful recreational activities

carried on by the members of the petitioner's

Club/Association.

(viii) It is made clear that this order would

not come in the way of the jurisdictional police

invoking the provisions of the Act and taking

action in accordance with law, if the member(s)

of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in

any unlawful or immoral activities.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SWK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter