Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Manjunatha Exports vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Central Tax
2026 Latest Caselaw 2157 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2157 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2026

[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Manjunatha Exports vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Central Tax on 11 March, 2026

Author: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
Bench: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2026:KHC:14516
                                                       WP No. 6883 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 6883 OF 2026 (T-RES)

                   BETWEEN:

                         M/S. MANJUNATHA EXPORTS,
                         A PARTNERSHIP FIRM CONSTITUTED UNDER
                         THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932,
                         REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER,
                         SRI. RAJINI G. K.
                         S/O C. S. GURUSWAMY,
                         AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                         NO. 554, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
                         2ND PHASE, 6TH BLOCK,
                         BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
                         BENGALURU - 560 085.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. VENKATESH G., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by VIJAYA P
Location:          AND:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA          1.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX,
                         WEST DIVISION-5, BENGALURU WEST
                         COMMISSIONERATE, 1ST FLOOR,
                         TTMC COMPLEX, BTMC BUS STAND,
                         BANASHANKARI,
                         BENGALURU-560070.

                   2.    THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF
                         CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS),
                         OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
                           -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:14516
                                   WP No. 6883 of 2026


HC-KAR



     CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS).
     S1 AND S2, VINAYA MARG,
     SIDDARTHA NAGAR,
     MYSURU-570 011.

3.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX,
     RANGE-CWD5,
     BENGALURU WEST COMMISSIONERATE,
     BMTC BUS STAND COMPLEX,
     FIRST FLOOR, BANASHANKARI,
     BENGLURU-560 070.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)

                         ***

      THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL NO.07/2021-22 WD5 DC DATED
03.08.2021   BEARING    DIN:    20210857YU000000E567
PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, HEREIN MARKED AS
ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                                   -3-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:14516
                                              WP No. 6883 of 2026


 HC-KAR



                              ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has sought for setting aside of the

Order-in-Original at Annexure-A as well as the Order-in-

Appeal at Annexure-B. The petitioner has also sought for

refund of statutory pre-deposit made under Section 107(6)

of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short

'CGST Act').

2. The case made out by the petitioner is that the

form GSTR-3B for the month of March-2019 came to be

filed online by the petitioner though belatedly on

28.10.2019. It is stated that respondent No.1 has issued

show-cause notice, proposing to demand Input Tax Credit

(ITC) amounting to Rs.27,21,200/- which allegedly had

been availed in contravention of the provision of Section

16(4) of the CGST Act.

3. It is the contention of the petitioner that the

Assessing Authority had declined to permit the petitioner

to claim ITC on the ground that it was belated in light of

NC: 2026:KHC:14516

HC-KAR

Section 16(4) of the CGST Act. It is submitted that by

virtue of amendment to Section 16(5), which is a non-

obstante clause, the time limit prescribed under Section

16(4) stood relaxed for the years of financial years

2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 till 30th day of

November, 2021. Accordingly, it is submitted that by

virtue of such amendment to the Finance Act with effect

from 01.07.2017, though the appointed date is

27.09.2024, the petitioner is entitled for credit to the ITC

availed.

4. Perused the Order-in-Original and Order-in-

Appeal. The only ground on which steps were taken to

deny ITC claim is that it was claimed beyond the period

prescribed under Section 16(4). Section 16(4) and Section

16(5) of the CGST Act reads as hereunder:

"16. Eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit.

(4) A registered person shall not be entitled to take input tax credit in respect of any invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or

NC: 2026:KHC:14516

HC-KAR

both after the [thirtieth day of November] following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier. (5) Nothwithstanding anything contained in sub-

section (4), in respect of an invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both pertaining to the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, the registered person shall be entitled to take input tax credit in any return under section 39 which is filed upto the thirtieth day of November, 2021."

5. It is pertinent to note that the Central Board of

Indirect Taxes and Customs vide Circular No.

237/31/2024-GST dated 15.10.2024, issued to all Principal

Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/ principal

Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All) and

Principal Director General/Directors General (All) has

clarified the issues regarding implementation of provisions

of sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) in section 16 of

CGST Act, 2017. The Circular clarifies that sub-section (5)

of Section 16 has been inserted retrospectively with effect

NC: 2026:KHC:14516

HC-KAR

from 01.07.2017 vide Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, thereby

overriding the earlier time restriction prescribed under

sub-section (4) of Section 16 in respect of the financial

years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. Sub-

section (5) to Section 16 was inserted by the Finance

(No.2) Act, 2024, with retrospective effect from

01.017.2017. In pursuant thereof, the Ministry of Finance

(Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes

and Customs, issued Notification No.17/2024-Central Tax,

dated 27.09.2024, followed by Circular No. 237/31/2024-

GST dated 15.10.2024 providing clarification regarding the

implementation of the said provision. The aforesaid

legislative development by insertion of sub-section (5) to

Section 16 through Finance (No.2) Act 2024, read with the

clarification, affirms that claims of Input Tax Credit (ITC)

availed through GSTR-3B returns filed up to 30th

November 2021 shall be permissible. The relevant extract

is reproduced hereunder:

NC: 2026:KHC:14516

HC-KAR

"Reference is invited to sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) of section 16 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "CGST Act") inserted in section 16 of the CGST Act, with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017, vide section 118 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, whereby the time limit to avail input tax credit under provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of CGST Act has been retrospectively extended in certain specified cases."

6. It must be noticed that Section 16(5) was

inserted by way of an amendment by Finance Act (No.2),

2024. The said clause is a non-obstante clause, as it

states, "notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section

(4)". If that were to be so, in light of the petitioner having

claimed ITC with respect to the financial year 2018-19, by

virtue of Section 16(5), petitioner's entitlement would be

extended till 30.11.2021, whereas the return of the

petitioner was filed on 28.10.2019. The return filed is

within the extended time prescribed under Section 16(5).

NC: 2026:KHC:14516

HC-KAR

7. In light of the same, the Order-in-Original at

Annexure-A as well as the Order-in-Appeal at Annexure-B

are set aside. Matter is remitted to the stage of reply to

show-cause notice. The petitioner to appear before the

respondent No.1 on 15.04.2026.

8. Needless to state, the authority to look into the

factual aspects of eligibility of claim of ITC, but not to

revisit the permissibility of claiming ITC by virtue of the

extended time under Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, in

light of the discussion made above. All other contentions

are kept open.

Accordingly, petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

MCR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter