Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2118 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
CRL.P No. 201253 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 201253 OF 2024
(482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. PANDU
S/O LAXMAN CHAVHAN
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
OCC: COOLIE
2. SRI. ANIL
S/O PANDU CHAVHAN
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
OCC: COOLIE
Digitally signed by BOTH ARE R/O FILTERBED
SHIVALEELA DUBAI COLONY, SHAHABAZAR
DATTATRAYA
UDAGI KALABURAGI
Location: HIGH TQ: AND DIST: KALABURAGI 585103
COURT OF
KARNATAKA ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ARUNKUMAR AMARGUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION
KALABURAGI
REPT. BY ADDL. SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DIST: KALABURAGI-585103
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
CRL.P No. 201253 of 2024
HC-KAR
2. SMT. ANITA W/O ESHAR RATHOD
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
OCC: COOLIE AND HOUSEHOLD
R/O PALA MALLAYYAN TANDA
KALABURAGI, NOW AT FILTERBED
SHAHABAZAR, KALABURAGI
TQ: AND DIST: KALABURAGI-585103
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.GOPALKRISHNA B. YADAV, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/SEC.482 OF CR.P.C (OLD) U/SEC.
528 OF BNSS (NEW) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND
FURTHER QUASH PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.9495/2022,
PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
KALABURAGI, REGISTERED ON THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY
THE RESPONDENT NO.1 UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION, BASED
ON THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR
THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC.338, 506 R/W 34
OF IPC CRIME NO.179/2021 UNIVERSITY P.S. KALABURAGI.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash the further
proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 in
C.C. No.9495/2022 (arising out of Crime No.179/2021 of
University Police Station, Kalaburagi), for the offence
punishable under Sections 338, 506 r/w 34 of IPC,
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
pending on the file of III Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC,
Kalaburagi.
2. The brief facts of the case are that, on the basis
of the complaint filed by Smt.Anita, the University Police
have registered the case in Crime No.179/2021 against
the accused Nos.1 to 3 for the commission of offence
punishable under Sections 338 and 506 r/w 34 IPC. After
investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted the
charge sheet against the accused Nos. 1 to 3 for the
aforesaid offences. The accused No.3/Dr.H.B.Kosgi had
filed petition before this Court in Criminal Petition
No.201447/2022 for quashing of the proceedings against
him which was allowed by this Court vide order dated
26.05.2023 and proceedings against him have been
quashed. The present petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2
have filed this petition seeking to quash the proceedings
against them in C.C. No.9495/2022.
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent No.1 - State.
4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners would submit that the registration of crime
against the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and amounts to
abuse of process of law same calls for interference. There
is unexplained and inordinate delay in lodging the
complaint against the petitioners. The incident of
accidental electrocution took place on 08.08.2021.
However, the complaint is lodged on 19.09.2021.
Therefore, the injury sustained and alleged incident is
highly improbable and the same is false. A bare perusal of
complaint and charge sheet material indicates the fact that
no material is produced in order to show that the injured
i.e., husband of respondent No.2 was working under the
petitioners. Hence, the petitioners cannot sit with duty of
taking safety measures and acted negligently in providing
safety measures. Looking to the complaint and charge
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
sheet material against the accused, it appears that
respondent No.2- the husband was a casual labourer who
was not under the supervision and control of these
petitioners. Equally, the Investigating Officer has also
failed to collect any material with regard to entrustment of
construction work to these petitioners in the absence of
aforesaid crucial materials cannot be said that the injured
was a labourer under the petitioners and discharging
assignments by following instructions of petitioners and
petitioners were awarded with the construction work of
Marriage Function Hall. Therefore, no offence as alleged in
the charge sheet is being made out. Hence, the petitioners
cannot be asked to face the trial. The respondent police
having failed to prove the fact that the petitioners were
occupiers and managers of the construction premises
where the incident of electrocution took place and liability
to observe safety measures. Hence, the petitioners cannot
be tried for the offence under Section 338 IPC.
Accordingly, he prays to allow the petition.
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for respondent No.1-State opposed to
the petition.
6. I have examined the materials placed before
this Court.
7. On the basis of the complaint filed by
Smt.Anita, the University Police have registered the case
against accused Nos.1 to 3 for the offence under Sections
338, 506 r/w 34 of IPC. After investigation, the
Investigating Officer submitted the charge sheet against
the accused Nos. 1 to 3 for the aforesaid offences. The Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Petition
No.201447/2022 has quashed the criminal proceedings
against accused No.3 as per order dated 26.05.2023. In
the charge sheet at column No.17, it is alleged against
these petitioners as under;
" ಾನ ರವರ ಾ ಾಲಯದ ಾ ಯ ೈ , ಶ ಾ ಲಯ ೕಸ ಾ ೆ ಸರಹ ಯ ! ಬರುವ ಕಲಬುರ% ನಗರದ 'ಾ(ಾಪ*ರ ಹ+ ರ ಇರುವ -ೋಸ% ಕ/ಾ ಣ ಮಂಟಪದ ಪಕ4ದ
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
5ೊಸ -ಾಮ6ಾ7 ಕಟ8ಡದ ! ಾಂಕ: 08-08-2021 ರಂದು ಮ ಾ ಹ: 12:30 ಗಂ;ೆ6ೆ ಈ ೋ=ಾ'ೋಪ ೆ ಪತ? -ಾಲ ನಂ 3 ರ ! ನಮೂ @ದ ಆ'ೋ ತನು ತನ: ಕ;ೆ8ಯ !ದ 5ೊಸ ಕಟ8ಡ B ಾCಣದ
-ಾಮ6ಾ7 ಾಡು+ ರುವ ಪಕ4ದ 'ೋDನ ! ಪಕ4 ಂದ /ೈEF ಕಂಬದ ೈGಗಳI 5ಾಯು 5ೋ%ದು, 6ೊ+ ದರು ಸಹ ಸದ7 ೈರುಗJ6ೆ ಸುರKತ ದೃMNOಂದ ಾ!@8P ೈQ 5ಾ ಸ ೆ ಅಲKತನ Sೋ7@, ಆ'ೋ ನಂ O1, ೇದವB6ೆ -ಾಮ6ಾ7 -ೆಲಸ ಗು+ 6ೆ BೕDದು ಇರುತ ೆ. ಸದ7 -ಾಮ6ಾ7 -ೆಲಸ-ೆ4 ಆ'ೋ ನಂ 01 ಮತು 02 ೇದವರು ಈ ೊ=ಾ'ೋಪ ೆ ಪತ?ದ -ಾಲಂ ನಂ 14 ರ !
ನಮೂ @ದ TಾU ನಂ, 4 ೇದವB6ೆ ಪ?+ ನ ಕೂ -ೆಲಸ-ೆ4 ಹVWದು, TಾU ನಂ, 4 ೇದವನು ಆ'ೋ ನಂ 01, 02 ೇದವ76ೆ ಾವX -ೆಲಸ ಾಡುವ ಪಕ4ದ ! /ೈEನ ಕಂಬದ ೈರುಗಳI 5ಾಯು 5ೋ%ದು, ಸದ7 ೈರುಗJ6ೆ ಾವX ೇ ಸುರKSೆ ಇ/ಾ! BೕವX
-ೆಲಸ-ೆ4 ಹVWರು 7 ಅಂSಾ -ೇJದರು. ಸಹ ಅವರು ಏನು ಆಗುವ /ಾ!
-ೆಲಸ ಾD7 ಅಂSಾ 5ೇJ 5ೋ%ದು ಇರುತ ೆ. TಾU ನಂ, 4 ೇದನು ಸದ7 -ಾಮ6ಾ7 ಕಟ8ಡದ ಪರ ಕಟ8ಲು -ೆಳಗZೆOಂದ ಸ ಲ[ ಉದದ ಕ]^ಣದ 'ಾಡು Sೆ6ೆದು-ೊಂಡು _ೕ/ೆ ಹತು Sಾ _ೕಲಗZೆ 5ೋ6ೆ ಒಮa/ೆ +ರು% ಾಗ ಸದ7 ಕ]^ಣದ 'ಾಡು /ೈEನ ಕಂಬದ ೈ76ೆ ಹ+ ದ7ಂದ TಾU ನಂ, 4 ೇದವB6ೆ ತ/ೆ6ೆ, ಬಲ6ೈ6ೆ, ಎಡಗcdನ ಹ+ ರ, eೆB:6ೆ, ಕುಂD ಹ+ ರ ಕ'ೆಂE fಾಖದ 6ಾ ಾಗhಾ% iಾ7 6ಾಯ ಾ%ದು ಇರುತ ೆ.
-ಾರಣ _ೕ/ೆ ನಮೂ @ದ ಆ'ೋ ತರು ಕಲಂ, 338 506 ಸಂಗಡ 34 ಐ @ ೇದರ ಪ?-ಾರ ಆ'ೋಪ Tಾ]ೕSಾ%ದ7ಂದ ಅವನ _ೕ/ೆ
ೋ.ಪ ಸ !@ದು ಇರುತ ೆ."
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
8. The Investigating Officer has recorded the
statement of witnesses i.e., Eshwara S/o: Tara Singh
Rathod, Kamalabai W/o: Tara Singh Rathod, Tara Singh
S/o: Heera Rathod, Vinod S/o: Tara Singh Rathod, Ambu
S/o: Kashinath Chavan, Raju S/o: Shankar Rathod so also
produced the wound certificate, photos, mahazars. On
perusal of these materials, at this stage, I am of the
considered opinion that, the prosecution has placed prima
facie materials to constitute the offence under Section 338
read with 34 IPC. On perusal of the prosecution papers, I
do not find any materials to proceed against the accused
for the offence under Section 506 r/w 34 IPC. Hence, I
proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
(a) The petition is allowed in part.
(b) The proceedings initiated against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C. No.9495/2022 (arising out of Crime No.179/2021 of University Police Station, Kalaburagi), only insofar as the offence
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2245
HC-KAR
punishable under Section 506 r/w 34 of IPC, pending on the file of III Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kalaburagi, is hereby quashed.
(c) The petition in respect of petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 to quash the proceedings for the offence under Section 338 r/w 34 of IPC in C.C.No.9495/2022, is hereby dismissed.
Registry is directed to send the copy of this order to
the trial Court to proceed against the petitioners/accused
Nos.1 and 2 for the offence under Section 338 r/w 34 of
IPC.
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 CT-BH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!