Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Veerabhadrappa vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1959 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1959 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Veerabhadrappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                              -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157
                                                      WP No. 201105 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 201105 OF 2026 (S-R)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI VEERABHADRAPPA
                   S/O NARASAPPA BADIGER,
                   AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 4 MONTHS,
                   SENIOR CITIZEN ADHAAR NO.8435 9193 4142,
                   OCC: RETIRED HEAD CONSTABLE,
                   PRESENTLY R/A NO.AT POST YELHERI,
                   YADGIR, KARNATAKA-585201.


                                                               ...PETITIONER

                   (BY SRI. BIRADAR SHARANAPPA SHANKAREPPA, AND
                    SRI JUKALE SHIVARAJ K. ADVOCATES)
Digitally signed
by SWETA
KULKARNI           AND:
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                        R/BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
                        FINANCE DEPARTMENT
                        GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                        VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                        BENGALURU-560001.

                   2.   THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                        DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS,
                        M. S. BUILDING,
                        BENGALURU-560001.
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157
                                           WP No. 201105 of 2026


HC-KAR




3.   THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
     GENERAL (A AND E), KARNATAKA,
     PARK HOUSE ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560001.

4.   THE COMMANDANT
     KSRP, 6TH BN
     GULBARGA-585102.

5.   THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
     DEPARTMENT OF TREASURIES
     DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE
     YADGIR-585201.

                                                   ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4, R5;
 SRI SUDHIRSINGH R. VIJAPUR, DSGI FOR R3)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, A)
ISSUE    A   WRIT       OF    MANDAMUS      DIRECTING     THE    3RD
RESPONDENT         TO   STOP    RECOVERY    OF    THE    COMMUTED
PORTION OF PENSION BEYOND 10 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AND
REFUND THE AMOUNT RECOVERED BEYOND THE SAID PERIOD
WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM. B) ISSUE A
WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO
CONSTITUTE         AN   EXPERT       COMMITTEE     FOR   THE     RE-
ASSESSMENT         OF   THE    QUANTUM     OF   COMMUTATION      OF
PENSION      AND    THE      YEARS   OF   RESTORATION     OF    FULL
PENSION. C) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER, DIRECTION AS
THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT.
                               -3-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157
                                       WP No. 201105 of 2026


HC-KAR




     THIS    PETITION,    COMING     ON    FOR    PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                         ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner in this writ petition is before this

Court seeking for the following reliefs:

(a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to stop recovery of the commuted portion of pension beyond 10 years and 8 months and refund the amount recovered beyond the said period with interest at the rate of 12% per annum;

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to constitute an expert committee for the reassessment of the quantum of commutation of pension and the years of restoration of full pension;

(c) Issue any other writ, order, direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

3. It is the case of the petitioner who is a retired

government servant that, at the time of retirement he was

paid lump sum amount after commutation of his pension,

and towards the recovery of the commutation amount paid

to him, amount is being deducted from his pension every

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157

HC-KAR

month. According to the petitioner, the respondent has

already recovered the lump sum commutation amount paid

to the petitioner and in spite of the same, monthly deduction

from the pension amount of the petitioner has not been

stopped. It is under these circumstances, the petitioner has

preferred this petition seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.

4. The petitioner has not approached the competent

authority before approaching this Court in this writ petition.

According to the petitioner, the respondent has already

recovered the commutation amount which was paid to him at

the time of his retirement. If that is so, it is for the petitioner

to file necessary representation before the competent

authority and seek recovery of the excess amount, if any

recovered from the petitioner. The respondents are bound to

consider the said representation and pass appropriate

orders.

5. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion

that, if the writ petition is disposed of permitting the

petitioners to submit appropriate representation to the

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157

HC-KAR

competent authority to stop the monthly recovery from his

pension towards commutation amount paid to them at the

time of his retirement and if it is found that, the respondents

have recovered excess amount from the petitioner, to make

a request for refund of such amount, the same would serve

the ends of justice.

6. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

The writ petition is disposed of with

permission to the petitioner to submit appropriate

representation to the concerned authority along

with the copy of this order and in the event, if

such a representation is submitted by the

petitioner, the competent authority within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of

such representation shall consider the said

representation in accordance with law, and if it is

found that the respondents have recovered

excess amount from the petitioner towards

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2157

HC-KAR

commutation amount, such excess amount shall

be refunded to the petitioner, forthwith.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13 CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter