Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jahangir vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1958 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1958 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2026

[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Jahangir vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200
                                                    CRL.P No. 200157 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                            CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200157 OF 2026
                                   (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))
                   BETWEEN:

                   JAHANGIR S/O MAHIBOOBSAB,
                   AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: ENGINEER,
                   R/O. RODALABANDA VILLAGE,
                   TQ. LINGASUGUR,
                   DIST. RAICHUR-584127.
                                                               ...PETITIONER

                   (BY SMT. SWATI M.N., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed        THROUGH KALABURAGI CITY WOMEN PS,
by SACHIN               KALABURAGI DISTRICT-585105,
Location: HIGH          REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                        KALABURAGI BENCH-585103.

                   2.   SMT. SYEDA AYESHA AMREEN W/O JAHANGEER,
                        AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
                        R/O. H.NO.4-601/73G,
                        BASAVESHWAR COLONY,
                        MUMTAJ MANJIL, M.B. NAGAR,
                        KALABURGI-585105.
                                                          ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA FOR R1;
                    SRI LIYAQAT FAREED USTAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
                                    -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200
                                           CRL.P No. 200157 of 2026


HC-KAR




      THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.
(OLD), UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS (NEW), PRAYING TO
ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE COGNIZANCE ORDER
DATED 25.03.2023 AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC
NO.1732/2023 IN CRIME NO.84/2022 OF KALABURAGI CITY
WOMEN P.S. AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 323,
504, 506, 109, 34 OF IPC AND UNDER SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE
FILE OF I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KALABURAGI.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                           ORAL ORDER

Accused No.1 is before this Court in this criminal

petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C

with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in

C.C.No.1732/2023 pending before the Court of I Additional

Civil Judge and JMFC, Kalaburagi arising out of Crime

No.84/2022 registered by Kalaburagi City Women Police

Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323,

504, 506, 109 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3

and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200

HC-KAR

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondent No.2 jointly submits that

dispute between the parties has been settled amicably at

the intervention of elders and well wishers of both the

parties. The petitioner and respondent No.2, who are

husband and wife, have decided to dissolve their marriage

and they have already approached the jurisdictional Court

for the said purpose in O.S.No.4/2026. They submit that

parties have filed a joint affidavit before this Court

reporting settlement and in view of the same, the petition

may be allowed.

3. The joint affidavit filed by the parties dated

09.02.2026 is taken on record. In paragraph Nos.3 to 7 of

the said joint affidavit, it is stated as follows :

"3. That the complainant/respondent No.2 is the wife of petitioner. Their marriage was solemnized on 21.06.2021 and both of them got separated by mutual consent as per Mohammedan Law.

4. That the complainant and petitioner herein on the advice of well wishers have entered into amicable settlement and both of them got separate by mutual consent as per Mohammedan law. Since the above matter is of matrimonial in nature. In

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200

HC-KAR

view of settlement entered between the parties, the above criminal petition may be quashed to meet the ends of justice.

5. It is agreed between the parties that in view of settlement arrived between respondent No.2 and petitioner which was settled for Rs.15,25,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lack Twenty five thousand) as a full and final settlement vide DD No.899826 dated 24.11.2025 out of above said amount, that Rs.15,00,000/- through DD and Rs.25,000/- by cash, to be paid to the respondent No.2, since the petitioner and respondent No.2 who already got mutual consent divorce as per their Muslim law.

6. That further petitioner filed O.S.No.04/2026, which is pending on file of Prl. Family Court, Kalaburagi to get dissolve their marriage as per law.

7. That the respondent No.2 has already withdrawn the Crl.Misc.No.1583/2024 filed before IV Addl. Civil Judge, Kalaburagi under provisions of domestic violence act seeking various reliefs against her husband. Further respondent No.2 also withdrawn RPFC No.200019/2024. That both of parties agreed to withdraw all the pending cases between their families."

4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram

Gopal and another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

reported in (2021) SCC OnLine SC 834 has observed

that notwithstanding the limitations provided under

Section 320 of Cr.P.C., this Court in exercise of its

inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., can quash

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200

HC-KAR

criminal cases registered even for non-compoundable

offences depending upon the gravity and nature of the

allegations, relationship between the parties and nature of

settlement between them. In the case on hand, petitioner

and respondent No.2 are husband and wife, who have now

decided to separate and put an end to the dispute between

them.

5. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion

that it is a fit case wherein this Court is required to

exercise its inherent powers so as to do complete justice

to the parties, who are before the Court. Accordingly,

following :

ORDER

i) Criminal petition is allowed.

ii) The entire proceedings in C.C.No.1732/2023

pending before the Court of I Additional Civil

Judge and JMFC, Kalaburagi arising out of

Crime No.84/2022 registered by Kalaburagi

City Women Police Station, for the offences

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2200

HC-KAR

punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504,

506, 109 read with Section 34 of IPC and

Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,

1961 are quashed as against the petitioner

herein.

In view of disposal of petition, pending interlocutory

applications, if any do not survive for consideration.

Accordingly, they are disposed of.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter