Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Naveed vs The State By Hosmane Police Station
2026 Latest Caselaw 653 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 653 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr. Naveed vs The State By Hosmane Police Station on 31 January, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                      -1-
                                                                  NC: 2026:KHC:5569
                                                            CRL.P No. 16590 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                                BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16590 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                              483(BNSS))
                       BETWEEN:

                       1.    MR. NAVEED
                             AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
                             S/O RAJAK,
                             RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, LEFT SIDE,
                             HOSAMANE EXTENSION
                             BHADRAVATHI 577 301

                                                                      ...PETITIONER

                       (BY SRI. PRAVEEN C.,ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       1.    THE STATE BY HOSMANE POLICE STATION,
                             BHADRAVATHI 577 301
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA
                             REPRESENTED BY THE S.P.P HIGH COURT BUILDING,
MURTHY RAJASHRI              BENGALURU 560 001
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
                       2.    RAVI
                             AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
                             S/O POOJARI BASAPPA,
                             RESIDING AT 1ST CROSS,
                             BHOVI COLONY,
                             BHADRAVATHI,
                             SHIVAMOGGA 577301.


                                                                    ...RESPONDENTS
                       (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R1,
                       SRI ADITHYA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
                                  -2-
                                                  NC: 2026:KHC:5569
                                            CRL.P No. 16590 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN SPL.CC NO.305/2025 (CRIME NO.152/2025) FOR
ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 64, 87 OF
BNS ACT AND SECTION 6 OF POCSO ACT, SECTION 9 OF
PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT REGISTERED BY
HOSMANE POLICE STATION NOW ON THE FILE OF THE
PENDING BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, FTSC-I SHIVAMOGGA.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

                           ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by sole accused under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Special CC No.305/2025 (Crime

No.152/2025 of Hosamane Police Station) registered for

the offences punishable under Sections 64, 87 of Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 9 of Prohibition of Child

Marriage Act, 2006 and Section 6 of Protection of Children

From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 pending on the file of the

learned Additional District Sessions Judge, FTSC-I,

Shivamogga.

NC: 2026:KHC:5569

HC-KAR

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner, the

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent

No.1/State and learned counsel for respondent No.2

3. The learned counsel for respondent No.2

submits that he has no objection for grant of bail to the

petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would

contend that there was a love affair between the petitioner

and the victim girl, that they married each other, and that

they were residing together. The statement of the victim

girl has been recorded at the instance of Anganwadi

worker and it has been registered as a FIR. There is no

any complaint by the parents of the victim girl. The victim

girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS

has specifically stated that she was having love affair with

the petitioner and they married and residing together.

There is no allegation of the petitioner having any forcible

sexual intercourse on her. As the charge sheet is filed, the

NC: 2026:KHC:5569

HC-KAR

petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. With

this, he prayed to allow the petition.

5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government

Pleader would contend that the victim girl is aged 17 years

and in spite of knowing the same the petitioner has

married her and had sexual intercourse with her. The

charge sheet materials show a prima facie case against

the petitioner for the offences alleged against him. With

this, she prays to reject the petition.

6. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court

has perused the charge sheet and other materials placed

on record.

7. As per the charge sheet, the petitioner and the

victim girl were in a love affair. The parents of the victim

girl did not consent to their marriage as it was an inter-

caste marriage. Therefore, accused No.1 took the victim

girl and married her, lived with her as husband and wife,

and had sexual intercourse with her on several occasions.

NC: 2026:KHC:5569

HC-KAR

The statement of the victim girl recorded under Section

183 of the BNSS indicates that she was in a love affair

with the petitioner, that they married each other, resided

together, and had sexual intercourse. The age of the

victim girl is 17 years and she is of the age of

understanding the consequences of her acts. Moreover,

the learned counsel for respondent No.2 has no objection

for grant of bail. There are no criminal antecedents of the

petitioner.

8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions.

In the result, the following:

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner is granted bail in Special CC

No.305/2025 (Crime No.152/2025 of Hosamane Police

Station) registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 64, 87 of BNS, Section 9 of Prohibition of Child

NC: 2026:KHC:5569

HC-KAR

Marriage Act, 2006 and Section 6 of Protection of Children

From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 pending on the file of the

learned Additional District Sessions Judge, FTSC-I,

Shivamogga subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

b) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witness either directly or indirectly.

c) The petitioner shall attend the Trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

bkm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter