Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S G Jayaram S/O G.R.Gidde Gowda(Late) vs G M Putte Gowda S/O Mulle Gowda (Late)
2026 Latest Caselaw 440 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 440 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

S G Jayaram S/O G.R.Gidde Gowda(Late) vs G M Putte Gowda S/O Mulle Gowda (Late) on 22 January, 2026

                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:3714
                                                           RSA No. 2461 of 2008


                      HC-KAR



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                                  BEFORE
                                  THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
                           REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2461 OF 2008 (DEC)

                      BETWEEN:

                      S.G.JAYARAM
                      S/O G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE)
                      AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
                      SALUMARA VILLAGE,
                      GONIBEEDU HOBLI & POST,
                      MUDIGERE TALUK,
                      CHIKMAGALUR-577132.
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
                      (ABSENT)

                      AND:

                      1.    G.M.PUTTE GOWDA
                            S/O MULLE GOWDA (LATE)
                            AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
                      2.    NAGAMMA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    W/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE)
KARNATAKA                   AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

                      3.    S.G.INDRESH
                            S/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE)
                            AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

                      4.    S.G.MOHANA
                            S/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE)
                            AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

                            ALL ARE RESIDING IN
                            SALUMARA VILLAGE,
                                -2-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:3714
                                           RSA No. 2461 of 2008


HC-KAR



    GONIBEEDU HOBLI & POST,
    MUDIGERE TALUK,
    CHIKMAGALUR-577132.
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL & ASSTS. ADVOCATE FOR R1;
 VIDE ORDER DATED 05.06.2025, R1 DISMISSED AS ABATED,
 SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K., ADVOCATE FOR R4; R3 SERVED)

      THIS   REGULAR     SECOND      APPEAL   IS    FILED   UNDER
SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.


      THIS   REGULAR      SECOND     APPEAL    IS    LISTED   FOR
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS
UNDER:
                         ORAL ORDER

The appeal is listed today for orders and the name of the

appellant is printed/ shown in the cause list. The name of the

appellant is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no

representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or

through video conferencing. The appellant is absent.

2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the

appeal was listed on 20.07.2023, on that day, counsel

Sri.P.Mahesh., was permitted to retire from the case and the

registry was directed to print the name of the appellant in the

cause list. Accordingly, the appeal is listed today by printing the

name of the appellant in the cause list. As could be seen from

NC: 2026:KHC:3714

HC-KAR

the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2008. Now we are in

2026. The appeal is pending from eighteen years. As already

noted above, the name of the appellant is called out thrice in

the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the

appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. The

appellant has not engaged counsel to represent him in the

Court. It appears that the appellant is not interested in

prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for

non-prosecution.

3. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order if

any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if

any are disposed of.

SD/-

(JYOTI M) JUDGE

PSJ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter