Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 322 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:3179
RSA No. 259 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 259 OF 2025 (DEC/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.PUTTASIDDAMMA @ JANAMMA
W/O LATE RACHASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
2. SURESHA
S/O LATE RACHASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
3. NANJA
S/O LATE RACHASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
4. SHIVANNA
S/O LATE RACHASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
Digitally signed 5. ABHILASHA
by ANUSHA V D/O LATE RACHASHETTY,
Location: High AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
Court of
Karnataka 6. ANANDA
S/O LATE RACHASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O NEW EXTENSION
CHANDUKATTE MOLE,
HARADANAHALLI HOBLI,
CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK - 571 127
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI P MAHESHA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:3179
RSA No. 259 of 2025
HC-KAR
AND:
1. SMT.ERAMMA
W/O LATE SHIVANANJAASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
2. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA
D/O LATE SHIVANANJAASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
3. MAHADEVASWAMY
S/O LATE SHIVANANJAASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
4. SUDHAMANI
D/O LATE SHIVANANJAASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O
CHENNIPURADAMOLE
EXTENSION,
CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN-571 313
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SIR M.M.SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 01.10.2024 PASSED IN RA 35/2023 ON THE
FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHAMARAJANAGARA,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 13.04.2023 PASSED IN OS NO. 229/2012 ON THE
FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
CHAMARAJANAGARA.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:3179
RSA No. 259 of 2025
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of
office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity
having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court
hours. However, there is no representation and office
objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that
appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!