Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 317 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:3198
RSA No. 29 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI SHAKIL
AGE 55 YEARS,
S/O LATE S.M. SHAFI,
R/AT NO.1,
NANDIDURGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 046,
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR D M., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1. SRI SYED RAFIC AHMED
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN,
R/A NO.7,
MUNISHAMAPPA LAYOUT,
Digitally signed by ST. THOMAS TOWN,
ANUSHA V LINGARAJPURA,
Location: High BENGALURU- 560 084.
Court of
Karnataka 2. SRI. MUKUNDA,
MAJOR,
S/O LATE G.K. MURTHY
R/AT C/O SUNITHA GOPALAN,
NO.12, 1ST CROSS,
SHANKARAPURAM,
BENGALURU -560 004.
3. SRI GHOUSIA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
W/O LATE MOHAMMED ASLAM
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:3198
RSA No. 29 of 2025
HC-KAR
4. ZAMEER TAJ,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
W/O ABDUK FAIROZ,
5. SYED DADA PEER,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
S/O LATE SYED MEHBOOB SAB,
6. SYED ROUSHAN
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
S/O LATE SYED MEHBOOB SAB,
ALL ARE R/O NO.245,
MASJID ROAD, 5TH CROSS,
BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU 560 064.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.12.2024 PASSED IN RA
NO.55/2018 ON THE FILE OF IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 20.09.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.2579/2006 ON THE
FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
BANGALORE.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:3198
RSA No. 29 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of
office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity
having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court
hours. However, there is no representation and office
objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that
appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 82
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!