Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 13 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:17
CRL.P No. 5984 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5984 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MANISH B KOTARI
S/O. BUDAMALA KOTARI G.M.,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 26/1,
GROUND FLOOR
BASAPPA ROAD,
OPP. PALLAVI APARTMENT
SHANTHI NAGAR,
WILSON GARDEN POST,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
2. SRI. VINOD B. KOTARI
S/O. BUDAMALA KOTARI G. M.,
Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
by NAGAVENI
R/AT NO. 325, 1ST CROSS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF BEHIND HOTEL HARIPRIYA,
KARNATAKA
BANDIGOWDA EXTENSION,
MANDYA TALUK-571 401.
ALSO R/AT NO. 7/5, 2ND FLOOR,
2ND MAIN ROAD,
BEHIND KIA SHOWROOM,
CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 560 020.
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:17
CRL.P No. 5984 of 2024
HC-KAR
3. SRI. RAJESH B KOTARI
S/O. BUDAMALA KOTHARI. G. M.
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 15, 1ST CROSS,
CSI COMPOUND,
LALBAGH CROSS ROAD,
WILSON GARDEN SOUTH,
BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 027.
4. SRI. PADAM S JAIN
S/O. SHANTILAL P.,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT ANHANT KRUPA
LUNAWAT BHAWAN, NO.9/4, LAXMI ROAD,
YELLAMMA GARDEN, SHANTINAGAR,
WILSON GARDEN POST,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHETAN JADHAV, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE BY MANCHENAHALLI POLICE STATION
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. SHANKAR REDDY K.V.
S/O. K. VENKATARAMANAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
NO. 232, 7TH MAIN,
MEI LAYOUT, BAGALAGUNTE,
BENGALURU CITY - 560 073.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA ADDL. SPP)
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:17
CRL.P No. 5984 of 2024
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN FIR REGISTERED
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS, ARRAINGING THEM AS ACCUSED
NO.1-4 IN CR.NO.28/2024 FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 419, 420, 465,
467, 468 AND 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
MANCHENAHALLI P.S.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned Addl.SPP on instructions would submit that the
charges have been framed and the petition would not be
entertainable at this juncture.
2. In the light of the charges being framed, the
entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of
the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR
KUMAR1.
(1994) 4 SCC 142
NC: 2026:KHC:17
HC-KAR
3. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such
remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed.
All contentions are left open to be urged before the
concerned Court.
SD/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 CT:BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!