Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Pawan Kashyap vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1865 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1865 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Pawan Kashyap vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:11907
                                                          CRL.P No. 17446 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                                BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                           CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17446 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                              482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI PAWAN KASHYAP
                            S/O K.S. MANJUNATHA SHARMA
                            AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
                            R/A No.1093, "GANESH KRUPA"
                            MAHESHWARINAGAR
                            T DASARAHALLI
                            BANGALORE - 560 057.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI M B RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY S.J. PARK POLICE STATION, BENGALURU
Digitally signed by
                            REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
LAKSHMINARAYANA             HIGH COURT BUILDING
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                            BENGALURU- 560 001.
COURT OF                                                           ...RESPONDENT
KARNATAKA

                      (BY SRI MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.PC (FILED
                      UNDER SECTION 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY
                      BAIL TO THE PETITIONER AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE
                      TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN
                      CR.No.142/2025 REGISTERED IN S.J PARK P.S. FOR THE OFFENCE
                      WHICH ARE MADE PENAL UNDER SEC.316(4) AND 318(4) OF BNS
                      2023 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2025 PASSED BY LXII
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:11907
                                           CRL.P No. 17446 of 2025


HC-KAR




ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS                JUDGE,     BENGALURU      IN
CRL.MISC.No.11036/2025.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                             ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section 482

of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime

No.142/2025 of S.J.Park Police Station, registered for

offences under Section 316(4) and 318(4) of BNS.

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned

Additional SPP for respondent/State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

accused No.2 who is similarly placed to that of this petitioner

has been granted bail by the Sessions Court. The allegation

against the petitioner is that as he was working as Sales

Executive in the firm of first informant has collected

Rs.17,00,000/- from the customers and he has

misappropriated it. Petitioner who has collected the amount

NC: 2026:KHC:11907

HC-KAR

from the customers has used it for registration of the vehicle,

payment of insurance, premium etc. The petitioner is ready

to co-operate with IO in the investigation and abide by any

conditions to be imposed by this Court. There are no criminal

antecedents of the petitioner. The offences alleged against

the petitioner are not punishable either with death or

imprisonment for life. With this he prayed to allow the

petition.

4. Per contra, learned Additional SPP would contend

that the matter is under investigation and the petitioner is

required for custodial interrogation. Petitioner alleged to have

created documents and got registered the buses and he has

dealt with the customers directly by-passing the first

informant. With this he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has

perused FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. As per averments of the complaint the petitioner was

working as a Sales Executive in the firm of the first

NC: 2026:KHC:11907

HC-KAR

informant. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has

collected Rs.17,00,000/- from various customers and

misappropriated it. The offence alleged against the petitioner

is not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.

The petitioner has undertaken to co-operate with the IO in

the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed

by this Court. The petitioner is not having any criminal

antecedents.

7. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has

made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions.

In the result, in following:

ORDER

Petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail, in the event of his arrest, in Crime

No.142/2025 of S.J.Park Police Station, subject to following

conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from this

NC: 2026:KHC:11907

HC-KAR

day and execute bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the IO whenever called for and co-operate for investigation.

(iii) Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(iv) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m. for a period of one month or till filing of the final report, whichever is earlier.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28 Ct.sm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter