Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Leelavathi vs Sri B T Krishnegowda
2026 Latest Caselaw 1673 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1673 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Leelavathi vs Sri B T Krishnegowda on 23 February, 2026

                                             -1-
                                                      NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                                      RFA No. 1055 of 2021


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                          PRESENT
                          THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
                                             AND
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
                         REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1055 OF 2021 (PAR)
                   BETWEEN:

                   SMT. LEELAVATHI,
                   D/O LATE KALE GOWDA,
                   W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR,
                   AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                   R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE,
                   RAMANATHPURA HOBLI, ARKALAGUD
                   TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
                                                               ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SMT. KAVYASHREE K, ADVOCATE FOR
                       SRI T SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed
by ARSHIFA         1.     SRI B T KRISHNEGOWDA,
BAHAR KHANAM
                          S/O LATE B.T.THIMMEGOWDA,
Location: HIGH            AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   1(a) RADHAMANI,
                        AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
                        W/O B.T KRISHNEGOWDA,
                        BASVANAHALLI VILLAGE,
                        ARAKALGUDU TALUK,
                        RAMNATHPURA HOBLI,
                        HASSAN DISTRICT.

                   1(b) ASHA JYOTHI BASAVANAHALLI,
                        AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
                           -2-
                                   NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                    RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




     D/O B.T KRISHNEGOWDA,
     13525, VICTORY BOULEVARD APARTMENT,
     VAN NUYS, SAN FRANCISCO,
     CA-91401, USA.

1(c) USHA B.K,
     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
     W/O ABHISHEK ASHOK KUMAR NARASIMHAIAH,
     DOOR NO. 407, 4TH FLOOR, 4TH CROSS,
     MANITO COMMANDERS MARVEL APARTMENT,
     DUO MARVEL LAYOUT, ANANTPURA GATE,
     BANGALORE-560 064.

1(d) SRINIVAS B.K,
     AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
     S/O LATE B.T. KRISHNEGOWDA,
     #MIG 252, 6TH B MAIN ROAD,
     B SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
     BANGALORE-560 064.

2.   SRI B.T.GOVINDEGOWDA,
     S/O LATE B.T.THIMMEGOWDA,
     AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS.

3.   SMT. PADMAMMA @ PADMA,
     D/O LATE B.T.THIMMEGOWDA,
     W/O LATE N.S.SOMANNA @ SOMEGOWDA,
     AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.

     RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 ARE
     R/AT HOLE BEEDI, 'RAGHU NILAYA',
     KUSHALNAGARA POST,
     SOMWARPETE TALUK
     KODAGU DISTRICT-571 236.

4.   SMT. SHRIMATHI,
     W/O LATE PARBHAKARA,
     D/O LATE B.T.THIMMEGOWDA,
     AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
                            -3-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                       RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




5.   SMT. ARUNDHATHI @ INDUMATHI B P,
     D/O LATE PRABHAKARA,
     AGED MAJOR.

     RESPONDENT NOS. 4 AND 5 ARE
     R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE,
     RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI,
     ARAKALAGUD TALUK
     HAASAN DISTRICT-573 102.

6.   SRI DEVARAJU K P,
     S/O LATE K.P.PUTTARAJU
     AND LATE KAMALA,
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
     R/AT DOOR NO.454,
     1ST CROSS, 4TH MAIN, MARUTHI
     TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR,
     MYSURU-570 023.

7.   SRI MAHESHA K P,
     S/O LATE K.P.PUTTARAJU AND
     LATE KAMALA,
     AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
     R/AT DOOR NO.454,
     1ST CROSS, 5TH MAIN, MARUTHI
     TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR,
     MYSURU-570 023.

     PRESENTLY R/AT FLAT NO.403,
     MANASA MAYURA APARTMENT,
     165-166/1, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS,
     YADAVAGIRI, MYSORE-570 020.

8.   SMT. SUNITHA K.V.,
     D/O LATE VENKATESHA AND LATE KAMAKSHI,
     W/O SRI PRAKASHA,
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
     R/AT DOOR NO.293, 8TH MAIN,
     'B' BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA,
     3RD STAGE, MYSURU-570 017.
                            -4-
                                    NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                     RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




9.    SMT. VINUTHA K.V.,
      D/O LATE VENKATESHA AND LATE KAMAKSHI,
      W/O JAYARAJ,
      AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
      R/AT DOOR NO.533, 14TH MAIN, 'B' BLOCK,
      VIJAYANAGARA, 3RD STAGE,
      MYSURU-570 017.

10.   SMT. KAVITHA K.V.,
      D/O LATE VENKATESHA AND
      LATE KAMAKSHI,
      W/O GURURAJ,
      AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
      R/AT DOOR NO.340, 17TH MAIN,
      'B' BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA, 3RD STAGE,
      MYSURU-570 017.

11.   SRI MANJUNATHA K.V.,
      D/O LATE VENKATESHA AND
      LATE KAMAKSHI,
      AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
      R/AT DOOR NO.533, 14TH MAIN,
      B BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA, 3RD STAGE,
      MYSURU-570 017.

12.   SMT. PREMA B.K,
      D/O LATE B.T.KALEGOWDA,
      W/O RAMACHANDRA,
      AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
      R/AT SIDDAPURA VILLAGE,
      HEBBAL HOBLI, K.R.NAGARA TALUK
      MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602.

13.   SMT. JAYALAKSHMI @ SAKAMMA B.K.,
      W/O BOREGOWDA,
      D/O B.T.KALEGOWDA,
      AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
      R/AT ATTIGUPE VILLAGE,
      BOREGOWDANA KOPPAL
      GAVADAGERE HOBLI,
                           -5-
                                   NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                   RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




      HUNSUR TALUK,
      MYSURU DISTRICT-571 105.

14.   SMT. VAIJAYANTHI B.K,
      W/O PUTTARAJEGOWDA,
      D/O LATE B.T.KALEGOWDA,
      AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
      R/AT ATTIGUPE VILLAGE,
      BOREGOWDANAKOPAL,
      GAVADAGERE HOBLI,
      HUNSUR TALUK,
      MYSURU DISTRICT-571 105.

15.   SMT. MANI B.K,
      W/O SOMEGOWDA,
      D/O LATE B.T.KALEGOWDA,
      AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
      R/AT 2/188, VINAYAKA BADAVANE,
      WARD NO.II, K.R.NAGARA TALUK,
      MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602.

16.   SMT. NETHRAVATHI B.K,
      W/O LATE RAMESHA,
      D/O LATE B.T.KALEGOWDA,
      AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
      R/AT 2/188, VINAYAKA BADAVANE,
      WARD NO.II, K.R.NAGARA TALUK
      MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602.

17.   SRI KUMARA,
      FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
      MAJOR,
      TENANT RUNNING A PROVISION STORE
      UNDER NAME AND STYLE "HARISH
      PROVISION STORES"
      AT GROUND FLOOR,
      D.NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
      RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, GANDHI CIRCLE,
      ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
                           -6-
                                  NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                   RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




18.   RAMESHA,
      FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
      MAJOR,
      TENANT RUNNING BAKERY,
      UNDER NAME AND STYLE "SLR BAKERY
      AND SWEETS" AT GROUND FLOOR,
      D NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
      RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, GANDHI CIRCLE,
      ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.

19.   MOOLARAM,
      FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
      MAJOR,
      TENANT RUNNING FANCY STORES,
      UNDER NAME AND STYLE "ANKUR FANCY
      AND GIFT STORES" AT GORUND FLOOR,
      D NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
      RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, GANDHI CIRCLE,
      ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.

20.   MAHESH,
      FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
      MAJOR,
      TENANT RUNNING PHOTO STUDIO,
      UNDER NAME AND STYLE "SHAILI STUDIO
      AND VIDEO" ON FIRST FLOOR,
      D NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
      RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, GANDHI CIRCLE,
      ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.

21.   GEETHA AND SHRIDHARA,
      FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
      MAJORS,
      TENANTS RUNNING BEAUTY PARLOUR,
      UNDER NAME AND STYLE "SINCHANA BEAUTY
      PARLOUR" ON FIRST FLOOR,
      D NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
      RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, GANDHI CIRCLE,
      ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
                            -7-
                                    NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                    RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




22.    RAVI,
       FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN,
       MAJOR,
       TENANT RUNNING TAILORING SHOP,
       WITHOUT NAME BOARDS IN MIDDLE SHOP
       PREMISES OF FIRST FLOOR,
       D NO.641, KERALAPURA VILLAGE,
       RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI,
       GANDHI CIRCLE,
       ARAKALAGUD TALUK,
       HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI A RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 (a to d) TO R-3,
    R-17 TO R-22;
    SRI M C JAYAKIRTHI, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5;
    SRI H.K REVANASIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R-8 TO T-16;
    R-6 & R-7 ARE SERVED)

      THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., 1908

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.09.2021 PASSED ON IA.NO.

VI    IN OS.NO.82/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND JMFC., ARAKALAGUD, ALLOWING THE IA.NO.VI

FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF

PLAINT.


      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
       and
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
                                    -8-
                                                 NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB
                                                 RFA No. 1055 of 2021


HC-KAR




                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

This appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff

challenging the order dated 01.09.2021 passed on

IA.No.VI in O.S.No.82/2019 by the Senior Civil Judge &

JMFC, Arakalagud (for short, 'the trial Court').

2. Smt.Kavyashree K., learned counsel for

Sri.T.Seshagiri Rao, learned counsel for the appellant

submits that defendant Nos.1 to 4 filed an application for

rejection of plaint on the ground that the earlier suit

between the same parties was adjudicated. It is submitted

that the said application was allowed, plaint was ordered

to be rejected.

3. Per contra, Sri.A.Ravi Shankar, learned counsel

for respondent Nos.1 to 3, 17 to 22 fairly submits that the

issue with regard to res judicata is required to be

considered as a preliminary issue by the trial Court and he

concedes the legal position and further submits that the

matter may be remitted back to the trial Court to consider

NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB

HC-KAR

the issue of res judicata as a preliminary issue by

disposing of this appeal.

4. Sri.M.C.Jayakirthi, learned counsel for the

respondent Nos.4 & 5 supports the aforesaid submission of

Sri.A.Ravi Shankar, learned counsel and submits that they

would co-operate with the trial Court for deciding the issue

on merits.

5. We have heard the arguments on both sides

and perused the material available on record.

6. It is to be noticed that the appellant filed a suit

in O.S.No.82/2019 for the relief of partition and separate

possession; in the said suit, defendant Nos.1 to 4 filed an

application - IA No.VI under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC

seeking rejection of plaint on the ground of res judicata.

Various contentions have been advanced by the parties,

however, it is to be noticed that contesting respondents

i.e., defendant Nos.1 to 4 in the suit, who filed an

application, fairly conceded that the issue of res judicata is

- 10 -

NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB

HC-KAR

required to be treated by the trial Court as a preliminary

issue. In view of the said specific submission, without

going into the merits of the case, we propose to allow the

appeal. Hence, the following:

ORDER

i. Appeal is allowed.

ii. The order dated 01.09.2021 passed on

IA.No.VI in O.S.No.82/2019 by the Senior

Civil Judge & JMFC, Arakalagud, is hereby

set aside. Consequently, IA.No.VI is

rejected.

iii. The trial Court is directed to consider the

suit on merits by framing the issue of res

judicata as a preliminary issue and provide

an opportunity to all the parties to the suit.

iv. The parties undertake to appear before the

trial Court on 08.04.2026.

- 11 -

NC: 2026:KHC:11157-DB

HC-KAR

v. Taking note of the fact that the suit is of

the year 2019, the trial Court shall dispose

of the suit as expeditious as possible.

vi. Pending applications, if any, are disposed

of.

It is made clear that this Court has not

expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

Sd/-

(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter