Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yashvanth. S. B vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1669 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1669 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Yashvanth. S. B vs State Of Karnataka on 23 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:10965
                                                          CRL.P No. 17121 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17121 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                         482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                            YASHVANTH. S. B.
                            S/O S B RAJU,
                            AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
                            R/AT SAVALANGA,
                            SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
                                                                     ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI UMESH MOOLIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR
                      SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            REPRESENTED BY
                            SHO, NYAMATHI PS POLICE
                            STATION, BENGALURU
                            BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING
Digitally signed by         HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             BENGALURU-560 001.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             2.    S B RAJU
                            S/O LATE SIDDAPPAAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
                            SAVALANGA VILLAGE, 576 117
                            NYAMATHI TALUK AND DISTRICT
                            DAVANAGERE.
                            (DELETED VIDE ORDER DTD. 18.12.2025)
                                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R-1;
                           SRI.NISHANTH.S.K., ADVOCATE)
                              -2-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC:10965
                                     CRL.P No. 17121 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC (FILED U/S 482
BNSS) PRAYING TO ORDER THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND
DIRECT THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER / ACCUSED ON BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH
NYAMATHI POLICE STATION, CR.NO.312/2025 AND PENDING
BEFORE THE LRD. ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONNALI,
REGISTERED FOR THE O/P/US 318(4), 316(2) OF BNS 2023,
AGAINST THE PETITIONER, IN CASE OF ARREST.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by the sole accused under

Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in

Crime No.312/2025 of Nyamathi Police Station, registered

for offences under Section 318(4), 316(2) of BNS.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned HCGP for respondent/State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend

that the business of Shree Marula Siddeswara Trading

Company is a proprietary concern and it is in the name of

the father of this petitioner. The father of the petitioner is

authorized signatory to make payments and sign cheques.

NC: 2026:KHC:10965

HC-KAR

The firm has filed income tax returns every year. There is

no any allegation in the said income tax returns. The

offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable

either with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioner is

ready to co-operate with the IO in the investigation and

abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. With this, he

prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that the

petitioner has misappropriated the funds of the Proprietary

concern of the first informant. The petitioner has taken the

key of the firm and car etc. The petitioner is required for

custodial interrogation. With this she prayed to reject the

petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has

perused the FIR, complaint and other material placed on

record.

NC: 2026:KHC:10965

HC-KAR

6. On perusal of the averments of the complaint, it

indicates that the first informant is the Proprietor of Shree

Marula Siddeswara Trading Company and it was run by the

first informant. The petitioner is the son of the first

informant. The first informant alleged to have left the

management of the firm standing in his name to the

petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner has caused loss

and misappropriated the funds of the firm. The offences

alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either

with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioner has

undertaken to co-operate with IO in the investigation and

abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

7. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has

made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with

conditions. In the result, the following:

ORDER

Petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail, in the event of his arrest, in Crime

NC: 2026:KHC:10965

HC-KAR

No.312/2025 of Nyamathi Police Station, subject to the

following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from this day and execute a bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of IO.

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the IO and co-operate for investigation.

(iii) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m. for a period of one month or till filing of the final report whichever is earlier.

(iv) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

NC: 2026:KHC:10965

HC-KAR

(v) In case of filing of the charge sheet, the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter