Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anshukumar vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1617 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1617 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Anshukumar vs State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:10883
                                                         CRL.P No. 17201 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17201 OF 2025
                                     [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)]

                      BETWEEN:

                      ANSHUKUMAR,
                      S/O. ANIL SAH,
                      AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                      R/O. PATAPTANDA VILLAGE AND POST,
                      VAISHALI DISTRICT,
                      VAISHALI BIHAR - 844 123.
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. CHIKKANNA Y.R., ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. ANAND R.V., ADVOCATE)


                      AND:

                      STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                      REPRESENTED BY SUB-INSPECTOR
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       VEMAGAL POLICE STATION,
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                      KOLAR DISTRICT -563 102.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             RERESENTED BY
                      STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                      OFFICE ATTACHED TO
                      HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                      DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                      BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP)

                           THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
                      U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE HIM ON REGULAR BAIL
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:10883
                                  CRL.P No. 17201 of 2025


HC-KAR



IN CRIME NO.103/2025 (VEMAGAL POLICE STATION KOLAR
DISTRICT) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
103(1) OF BNSS 2023 SAME IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF II
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by sole accused under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Crime No.103/2025 of Vemagal Police

Station registered for offences punishable under Sections

103(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent -

State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend

that, the petitioner, deceased and her son were residing

together. The petitioner when came to the house drunk,

the deceased objected for the same and assaulted him on

his cheek. Enraged by that, the petitioner has assaulted

NC: 2026:KHC:10883

HC-KAR

her on her cheek and kicked on the stomach and she fell

down and she was taken to the hospital and she is found

dead. The incident has taken place in a sudden quarrel

between the petitioner and the deceased. The petitioner

has assaulted the deceased as the deceased has assaulted

him. The petitioner has not used any weapon. C.W.1 to

C.W.3 and C.W.5 are eyewitnesses to the incident. As the

charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for

custodial interrogation. There are no criminal antecedents

of the petitioner. With these, he prayed to allow the

petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent would contend that, the incident

has been witnessed by C.W.1 to C.W.3 and C.W.5. C.W.5

is the son of the deceased aged seven (7) years. In the

statements they specifically stated the acts of this

petitioner assaulting the deceased with hands and kicking

her on her stomach. The charge sheet materials show

prima-facie case against the petitioner for offences alleged

NC: 2026:KHC:10883

HC-KAR

against him. With these, he prayed for dismissal of the

petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing

for parties, the Court has perused the charge sheet and

other materials placed on record.

6. As per charge sheet, the case of the

prosecution is that the petitioner, deceased and her son

were residing together in a house. The petitioner came

drunk to the house on 07.06.2025. At that time, the

deceased asked him not to come to home drunk and

closed the door. When the petitioner knocked the door

with a force, at that time C.W.2 and C.W.3 - neighbours

came there and at that time, the deceased opened the

door. The petitioner went inside and in the presence of

C.W.5, the deceased assaulted the petitioner on his cheek

twice and at that time the petitioner enraged by that

assaulted her with hand on her cheek and kicked on her

stomach and she fell down. When C.W.1 came there and

NC: 2026:KHC:10883

HC-KAR

asked why he is assaulting the deceased, at that time the

petitioner tried to assault C.W.1 and C.W.2 and ran away

from the spot. The deceased was taken to the hospital and

she is found dead. The incident has been witnessed by

C.W.1 to C.W.3 and C.W.5 is the son of the deceased aged

seven (7) years. The postmortem report indicates that,

the cause of death is due to hemorrhagic shock as a result

of laceration of spleen (an intra-abdominal organ). The

alleged assault by the petitioner was in a sudden quarrel

between him and the deceased. The petitioner stated to

have assaulted the deceased as the deceased has

assaulted him on his cheek twice. The petitioner has not

used any weapon. There are no criminal antecedents of

the petitioner.

7. Considering all the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions. In

the result, the following;

NC: 2026:KHC:10883

HC-KAR

ORDER The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is

granted bail in Crime No.103/2025 of Vemagal Police

Station, subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Court.

ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

iii) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted by the Court and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter