Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devaraju @ Vinith Devendra @ Devu vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1606 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1606 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Devaraju @ Vinith Devendra @ Devu vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC:10769
                                                        CRL.P No. 12427 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12427 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                             483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    DEVARAJU @ VINITH DEVENDRA @ DEVU
                            S/O RUDRAIAH,
                            AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
                            R/AT KUSHAVARA VILLAGE,
                            AREHALLI HOBLI,
                            BELUR TALUK,
                            HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. YASHWANTH M. FOR
                      SRI GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
                      AND:


Digitally signed by   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             BY BELUR POLICE STATION
Location: HIGH              HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                   REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING
                            BANGALORE - 01.

                      2.    YASHODA
                            W/O LATE RDURAIAH,
                            AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
                            R/O MALLIGANURU VILLAGE,
                            BIKKODU HOBLI,
                                 -2-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:10769
                                         CRL.P No. 12427 of 2025


HC-KAR




       BELUR TALUK,
       HASSAN DIST 573201.
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHD.AYUB ALI, ADDL.SPP)

     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 439
CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY
BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER REGULAR BAIL IN CR.NO.311/2024 REGISTERED
BY THE BELUR P.S., HASSAN DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 137(2),75,96,126(2),351(2),64 OF BNS, U/S 6 OF THE
POCSO ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS      JUDGE,     FTSC-I,     AT    HASSAN     IN
SPL.C.NO.69/2025.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, FTSC-1, HASSAN.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR



                           ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by the sole accused under

Section 483 of the BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime

No.311/2024 of Belur Police Station, registered for

offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 75, 96,

126(2), 351(2) and 64 of BNS and Section 6 of POCSO

Act, pending in a Spl.C.No.69/2025 on the file of

Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-1, Hassan.

NC: 2026:KHC:10769

HC-KAR

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional SPP for respondent No.1/State. Inspite

of service of notice, respondent No.2 remained absent and

unrepresented.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend

that petitioner and the victim girl were in love affair and

the same has been stated by the victim girl in her

statement recorded by the investigating officer and also

before the doctor at the time of her examination. The

victim girl is aged 15 years as on the date of alleged

offence and she is of the age of understanding the

consequences of her acts. The petitioner is in judicial

custody since 21.12.2024 and as the charge sheet is filed,

he is not required for further custodial interrogation. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. With this, he

prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned Addl.SPP would contend that

the victim girl in her statement before the Investigating

Officer has stated that the petitioner had forcible sexual

NC: 2026:KHC:10769

HC-KAR

intercourse in a room in a lodge. The victim girl is aged 15

years as on the date of alleged offence. The charge sheet

materials show prima-facie case against the petitioner for

the offences alleged against him. With this he prayed to

reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has

perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on

record.

6. The case of the prosecution as per charge sheet is

that the accused came in contact with CW.2/victim girl and

told her that he is loving her and promised to marry her

and took her on 18.12.2024 at 07.00 a.m. on his bike and

roamed with her and took her to a room in the lodge and

had sexual intercourse several times till 07.00 a.m. on

19.12.2024.

7. The date of birth of the victim girl as per her

school records is 18.03.2010. The victim girl is aged about

15 years. The victim girl in her statement before the

NC: 2026:KHC:10769

HC-KAR

Investigating Officer has stated that she was in love affair

with the petitioner and on coming to know the same the

family members of the victim girl have scolded her and

she intimated the same to the petitioner. At that time

petitioner told her that he will marry her. On 18.12.2024,

he took her on bike and roamed with her till evening and

took her to a room in a hotel and had sexual intercourse

against her will. The victim girl has been examined by the

doctor and at the time of examination the victim girl has

stated before the doctor that she had affair with the

petitioner. They were chatting on phone and on

18.12.2024 he took her to Sumukh Residency, Belur from

08.00 p.m. to 07.00 a.m. and both had consensual sex

there.

8. Considering the above aspects, it is clear that the

victim is having love affair with the petitioner. The victim

girl is of the age of understanding the consequences of her

acts. As the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not

required for further custodial interrogation. The petitioner

NC: 2026:KHC:10769

HC-KAR

is in judicial custody since 21.12.2024. There are no

criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Considering the

above aspects, the petitioner has made out a case for

grant of bail with conditions. In the result, the following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted bail

in Spl.C.No.69/2025 (Crime No.311/2024 of Belur Police

Station) on the file of Additional District and Sessions

Judge, FTSC-1, Hassan, subject to following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute a personal

bond for sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one

surety to the satisfaction of the trial

Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the

prosecution witnesses either directly or

indirectly.

(iii) The petitioner shall attend the trial

Court on all dates of hearing unless

NC: 2026:KHC:10769

HC-KAR

exempted and co-operate for speedy

disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter