Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandhan Prajwal @ Chandru vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1605 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1605 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Chandhan Prajwal @ Chandru vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                    -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:10770
                                                           CRL.P No. 14075 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                                 BEFORE
                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 14075 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                               483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    CHANDHAN PRAJWAL @ CHANDRU
                            S/O SUNIL
                            AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
                            No.7/7, 7TH MAIN
                            BUVANESHWARI NAGARA
                            K. P. AGARAHARA
                            MAGADI ROAD
                            BANGALORE - 560 023.
                                                                        ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI C VINAY SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                            REP. BY S.H.O. MAGADI ROAD POLICE STATION
Digitally signed by         BANGALORE CITY
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             BANGALORE - 560 023.
Location: HIGH              REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
COURT OF                    HIGH COURT BUILDING
KARNATAKA                   BENGALURU-560 001.
                                                                    ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SRI MOHD.AYUB ALI, ADDL.SPP)

                           THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
                      (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW
                      THE ABOVE BAIL PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
                      BAIL AND ORDER TO RELEASE HIM ON BAIL, IN CRIME
                      No.191/2025 ARRESTED BY THE MAGADI ROAD POLICE,
                                 -2-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:10770
                                         CRL.P No. 14075 of 2025


HC-KAR




BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 109,118(1),126(6),61,190 R/W SECTION 3(5) OF
BNS ACT AND SECTION 25(1B),(B) OF ARMS ACT.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR



                          ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by Accused No.6 under Section

483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime No.191/2025 of

Magadi Road Police Station registered for offences

punishable under Sections 109, 118(1), 126(6), 61, 190

read with Section 3(5) of BNS and Section 25(1B)(B) of

Arms Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

Addl.SPP for respondent/State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that

accused Nos.1 and 4 who are similarly placed to that of

petitioner have been granted bail by this Court in

Crl.P.No.14072/2025 by order dated 18.11.2025.

Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail on the

NC: 2026:KHC:10770

HC-KAR

ground of parity. Accused Nos.7 and 8 have been granted

bail by the Sessions Court. As the charge sheet is filed,

petitioner is not required for further custodial

interrogation. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned Addl.SPP would contend that

as per charge sheet, accused No.1 was having grudge

against CW.2 and he and his followers have assaulted him.

The wound certificate of CW.2 indicates that he has

sustained two simple injuries. CW.11 is the eyewitness to

the incident. With this he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court has

perused FIR, complaint and other materials placed on

record.

6. This Court while granting bail to accused Nos.1

and 4 in the order dated 18.11.2025 passed in Criminal

petition 14072/2025 has observed as under:

7. As per case of the prosecution, the accused persons have assaulted C.W.2 with weapons like iron long chopper, machete and dagger. The wound

NC: 2026:KHC:10770

HC-KAR

certificate of C.W.2 indicates that he has sustained two simple injuries. The only eyewitness to the incident is C.W.11 and he has not stated overt act of each of accused persons. The petitioner No.1 - accused No.1 has been granted bail in Crime No.440/2020 of Chittoor Town Police Station. As the charge sheet is filed, petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation. Petitioners are in judicial custody since 19.08.2025. Considering the above aspects, petitioners have made out case for grant of bail with conditions.

7. The petitioner is also similarly placed to that of

accused Nos.1 and 4, who have been granted a bail by this

Court. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail

on the ground of parity. As the charge sheet is filed, the

petitioner is not required for further custodial

interrogation. The petitioner is in judicial custody since

18.08.2025. Petitioner is not having any criminal

antecedents. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions.

8. In the result, the following:

NC: 2026:KHC:10770

HC-KAR

ORDER

The petition is allowed. Petitioner is granted bail in

Crime No.191/2025 of Magadi Road Police Station, subject

to following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) Petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

(iii) Petitioner shall attend the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter