Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harischandra M Mendon vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1504 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1504 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Harischandra M Mendon vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:10105
                                                          CRL.P No. 16542 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 16542 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                             482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    HARISCHANDRA M MENDON
                            S/O MAHABALA PUTRAN
                            AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
                            R/AT No.5-143E, NS ROAD
                            INDIRA NIVAS, HEJAMADI POST
                            UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 103.
                                                                    ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI JAYANTHA POOJARY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER
                            PADUBIDRI POLICE STATION
Digitally signed by
                            UDUPI DISTRICT- 574 111.
LAKSHMINARAYANA             REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MURTHY RAJASHRI
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    BENGALURU - 560 001.
KARNATAKA
                                                                ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C (FILED
                      UNDER SECTION 482 BNSS)        PRAYING TO RELEASE THE
                      PETITIONER IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN RESPECT OF
                      CR.NO.120/2025 OF PADUBIDRI POLICE STATION FOR THE
                      OFFENCE P/U/S 417,419,420,465,468,471 OF IPC AND SEC.35
                      OF ADHAR ACT 2016.
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2026:KHC:10105
                                   CRL.P No. 16542 of 2025


HC-KAR




    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by the sole accused under

Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in

Crime No. 120/2025 of Padubidri Police Station registered

for offence under Sections 417, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471

of IPC and Section 35 of Aadhar Act, 2016.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned HCGP for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend

that the allegation in the averments of complaint is that

Aadhar card number of the first informant has been used

in the sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner. There

is no allegation that the property belongs to the first

informant. Petitioner has mentioned the Aadhar number of

his vendor in the sale deed based on the information given

NC: 2026:KHC:10105

HC-KAR

by the vendor. Said sale deed has been executed by the

petitioner in favour of himself as a GPA holder of the

vendor. Said act of the petitioner is a bona fide mistake.

Petitioner is ready to rectify the said mistake by getting

the correction deed executed, correcting the Aadhar

number of his vendor in the sale deed. Petitioner is aged

73 years and he is suffering from age-related ailments.

Petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating

Officer in the investigation and abide by any conditions to

be imposed by this Court. The offences alleged against the

petitioner are not punishable either with death or

imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of

the petitioner. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that

petitioner has executed sale deed in his own favour as a

GPA holder of the vendor. In the GPA deed also the

Aadhar number of the executant is not mentioned. The

Aadhar number of the first informant has been misused by

NC: 2026:KHC:10105

HC-KAR

the petitioner. Petitioner is required for custodial

interrogation. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties,

the Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other

materials placed on record.

6. One Sri. Krishna Murthy, son of Narayanappa,

aged 72 years, resident of Hejamadi Village, had executed

GPA dated 09.12.2021 in favour of the petitioner, in

respect of his property, bearing survey No. 58/12B,

measuring 23 cents, situated in Hejamadi Village. Based

on the said GPA, petitioner had executed sale deed in his

own favour as a GPA holder of the vendor in respect of the

said property by registered sale deed dated 15.12.2021.

In the said sale deed Aadhar number of vendor Sri.

Krishna Murthy has been mentioned. Averments in the

first information indicate that Aadhar number mentioned in

front of the name of Sri. Krishna Murthy is of the first

informant. What is the basis for mentioning the Aadhar

number of the first informant in the sale deed dated

NC: 2026:KHC:10105

HC-KAR

15.12.2021 is a matter of investigation. The offence

alleged against petitioner is not punishable either with

death or imprisonment for life. Petitioner is aged 73 years

and he has undertaken to cooperate with Investigating

Officer in the investigation and abide by any conditions to

be imposed by this Court. There are no criminal

antecedents of the petitioner.

7. Considering the above aspects, petitioner has

made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with

conditions.

In the result, the following;

ORDER

Petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.

120/2025 of Padubidri Police Station subject to following

conditions:

I. Petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the

Investigating Officer within 15 days from this day

NC: 2026:KHC:10105

HC-KAR

and execute bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of

the Investigating Officer.

II. Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating

Officer whenever called for and cooperate for

investigation.

III. Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court

or to any Police officer or tamper with the evidence.

IV. In case of filing of chargesheet, petitioner shall

appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing,

unless exempted and cooperate for speedy disposal

of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 Ct-sm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter