Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer
2026 Latest Caselaw 1378 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1378 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer on 17 February, 2026

                                                    -1-
                                                               MFA No.101336 of 2016




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                            DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                               BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
                         MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101336 OF 2016 (LAC)
                   BETWEEN:
                   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                   H.P.R AND R. DIV. ATHANI-591304.
                                                                         ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. K.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
                        HIPPARAGI PROJECT, ATHANI-591304.

                   2.   SRI. RAMU S/O SANTARAM NAGARALE
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O: DIGGEWADI, TQ: RAIBAG,
                        DIST: BELAGAVI-590006.

                   3.   SRI. NAIKAPPA S/O MAHADEV NAGARALE
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O: DIGGEWADI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI.

                   4.   SRI. SHRIMANT S/O MAHADEV NAGARALE
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
Digitally signed
                        R/O: DIGGEWADI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI.
by
MOHANKUMAR
B SHELAR
                                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
Location: High
Court of
                   (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench      NOTICE TO R2 TO R4-SERVED)

                         THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
                   54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
                   APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE
                   LEARNED SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RAIBAG, IN LAC
                   NO.30/2015 DATED 24.04.2015 BY LIMITING THE ENHANCEMENT OF
                   MARKET VALUE OF THE ACQUIRED LAND TO RS.3,21,500/- PER ACRE
                   INSTEAD OF RS.6,17,760/- AND ETC.

                         THIS MFA HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
                   JUDGMENT ON 05.02.2026 AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
                   THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -2-
                                                 MFA No.101336 of 2016




CORAM:     THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

                           CAV JUDGMENT

The appellant has preferred the present appeal

challenging the judgment and award dated 24.04.2015

passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Raibag,

in LAC No.30/2015.

2. The facts of the case are that;

The agricultural lands belonging to the claimants

situated at Diggewadi village, Raibag Taluk, were acquired

for the Hipparagi Project pursuant to a notification issued

under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, dated

15.01.2009. The Special Land Acquisition Officer passed an

award on 21.06.2012, fixing the market value at

Rs.47,097/- per acre for dry lands and Rs.1,88,283/- per

acre for irrigated lands, treating the acquired lands as

irrigated. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded, the

claimants sought reference under Section 18(1) of the Act,

contending that the lands were fertile, fully irrigated and

capable of yielding commercial crops. Before the Reference

Court, the claimants asserted that the acquired lands were

irrigated by Krishna river, canal, borewell and open well and

were used for cultivation of sugarcane and other

commercial and horticultural crops. Oral and documentary

evidence was adduced to establish crop yield and income.

Relying upon the capitalization method and placing reliance

on an earlier judgment in LAC No.110/2014 relating to

similarly situated lands acquired for the same project, the

Reference Court enhanced the market value to

Rs.6,17,760/- per acre along with statutory benefits,

leading to the present appeal by the acquiring authority.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant

submits that the Reference Court has committed an error in

enhancing the compensation by placing reliance on the

judgment passed in LAC No.110/2014. It is contended that

the said judgment was carried in appeal before this Court in

MFA No.103598/2015 filed by the beneficiary-KNNL and

this Court, by judgment dated 18.01.2018, was pleased to

modify the award and reduce the market value to

Rs.4,61,250/- per acre. It is submitted that when the very

judgment relied upon by the Reference Court has been

modified by this Court, the impugned award cannot be

sustained and requires interference. It is further submitted

that on the principle of parity, the compensation in the

present case also requires to be fixed at Rs.4,61,250/- per

acre.

4. Learned High Court Government Pleader

appearing for respondent No.1 fairly submits that in view of

the judgment passed by this Court in MFA No.103598/2015,

the compensation awarded by the Reference Court may be

reduced to Rs.4,61,250/- per acre and has no objection for

passing appropriate orders.

5. Respondent Nos.2 to 4, though served, remain

unrepresented.

6. Having considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel for the appellant and the learned HCGP for

respondent No.1, and on perusal of the impugned judgment

and award, it is clear that the Reference Court has

enhanced the compensation solely by relying upon the

judgment passed in LAC No.110/2014. It is not in dispute

that the said judgment has been subsequently modified by

this Court in MFA No.103598/2015 dated 18.01.2018,

wherein the market value has been reduced and fixed at

Rs.4,61,250/- per acre.

7. When the very foundation for enhancement

relied upon by the Reference Court has been altered by this

Court, the compensation awarded in the present case

cannot be allowed to stand at a higher rate. The lands

involved in the present appeal and the lands involved in LAC

No.110/2014 are similarly situated and acquired for the

same project. Therefore, the principle of uniformity and

parity necessarily applies.

8. In view of the above, this Court is of the

considered opinion that the judgment and award passed by

the Reference Court in LAC No.30/2015 requires

modification in terms of the judgment passed by this Court

in MFA No.103598/2015.

9. Accordingly, this court proceeds to pass the

following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

ii) The judgment and award dated 24.04.2015

passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and

JMFC, Raibag, in LAC No.30/2015 is modified.

iii) The market value of the acquired land is fixed at

Rs.4,61,250/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Sixty One

Thousand Two Hundred Fifty only) per acre.

iv) The claimants shall be entitled to statutory

benefits under Sections 23(1A), 23(2) and 28 of

the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the modified

compensation amount.

v) The amount already paid, if any, shall be given

due set-off.

No order as to costs.

Sd/-

(DR. K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

MBS,CT:VP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter