Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Savin Kumar @ Sourabh vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1369 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1369 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Savin Kumar @ Sourabh vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:9444
                                                        CRL.P No. 16904 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 16904 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                             483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SAVIN KUMAR @ SOURABH
                            S/O KRISHNA MOHAN SINGH
                            AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
                            R/AT. KATAHARA VILLAGE
                            SULTANGANJ TALUK
                            BHAGALPUR DISTRICT,
                            BIHAR STATE-812 005.
                                                                    ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI. ABHISHEK HUDDAR, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY DEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION
Digitally signed by         BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P.,
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             HIGH COURT PREMISES
Location: HIGH              BANGALORE-560 001.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                      2.    VIMMI TULSIYAN,
                            W/O OF AJIT TULSIYAN
                            AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
                            R/AT. KRISHNA KUNJ HOUSE
                            DEFENCE COLONY, DEVANAHALLI TOWN
                            BENGALURU-562 110.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS

                      (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R1
                       V/O DTD. 9.1.26, R2 IS DELETED)
                             -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:9444
                                   CRL.P No. 16904 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.P.C
(UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 ON BAIL IN SC.No.15001/2023 OF
DEVANAHALLI P.S., BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 302, 201 R/W 34
OF IPC.


    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                     ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by accused No. 2 under

Section 483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in S.C. No.

15001/2023 pending on the file of V Additional District

and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District sitting at

Devanahalli registered for offences under Section 302 and

201 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned HCGP for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend

that petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.09.2022.

Prosecution has already examined 15 witnesses and it has

NC: 2026:KHC:9444

HC-KAR

to examine the remaining cases. There is no recovery at

the instance of this petitioner. Recovery of cash, locker

cutting machine, gold and silver coins is at the instance of

accused No. 1 and accused No. 3 from the house of

C.W.20. Voluntary statement of this petitioner has been

recorded. He has stated that he has spent Rs.1,00,000/-

given to him out of the robbed amount as his share. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is

ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this

Court. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that

the complainant has identified this petitioner as the person

who was working earlier in the Electric and Hardware Shop

of the husband of deceased. The CCTV footage has been

recovered wherein this petitioner is found carrying a bag.

The total robbed amount is Rs.14,00,000 and at the time

of robbery the accused persons have killed the deceased.

Petitioner was working in the Electric and Hardware Shop

of the C.W.1 and he was aware of the cash, gold and silver

NC: 2026:KHC:9444

HC-KAR

kept in the locker by C.W.1. He, along with the other

accused made a plan to rob the said cash, gold and silver.

In the process of robbery, they have killed the deceased.

The offence alleged against the petitioner is a heinous

offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life.

Petitioner is a resident of Bihar and if he is granted bail he

will flee from justice and not available for trail. With this

she prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties,

the Court has perused the chargesheet and other

materials placed on record.

6. As per chargesheet case of the prosecution is

that accused Nos. 1 and 2 were working in Electric and

Hardware Shop of C.W.2. On 09.07.2022, they told

accused No. 3 that there are lakhs of Rupees in the house

of C.W.2 and aunty will be alone in their house and all the

three can go to their house, cut the locker and rob the

cash. In furtherance of the said plan, on 10.07.2022,

accused Nos. 1 to 3 have purchased a locker cutting

NC: 2026:KHC:9444

HC-KAR

machine and stayed in the house of younger brother of

accused No. 3 (C.W.20) in Bengaluru till 14.07.2022. On

15.07.2022 at about 08.30 am they carried the locker

cutting machine in a bag, purchased a knife and kept a

watch on movement of persons to the house of C.W.2. At

about 02.15 pm when C.W.1, C.W.3 and C.W.4 went out

of the house accused persons pressed the calling bell of

the house, deceased Smt. Anchala Tulsiyan opened the

door, accused persons told her that they have come for

work again and asked her to make a call to C.W.2. When

the deceased was picking up the phone-set kept on the

teepoy, at that time, accused No. 2 held the head and

mouth of deceased, accused No. 3 held the legs, made the

deceased to lie on the floor, at that time, accused No. 1

took the knife kept in the pocket of accused No. 2, went

behind the deceased, held her chest with left hand and slit

her neck with the right hand by using knife. Thereafter,

accused Nos. 1 to 3 took the cash locker box, wrapped it

in a bed sheet and took the cash kept in a carton box.

NC: 2026:KHC:9444

HC-KAR

Accused No. 2 took the CCTV camera and DVR set-up box

and went away. Thereafter all the accused persons cut the

locker and accused No. 1 took Rs.3,00,000/-. Remaining

amount was kept in a black plastic cover, kept it in the

locker and kept it in the plastic drum in the house of

C.W.20. On 18.07.2022, all the accused shared

Rs.1,00,000/- each out of the said Rs.3,00,000/- taken by

accused No. 1 out of the robbed amount. There is

recovery of cash of Rs.11,05,700, 15 silver coins, Mobile

purchased by accused No. 1 out of his share of amount.

Total robbed amount is Rs.14,05,700/-, 15 silver coins and

one golden coin.

7. Petitioner and accused No. 1 were working in

the shop of C.W.2 and were aware of C.W.2 keeping the

cash and gold in the locker in the house. They made a plan

with accused No. 3. At the time of robbery, they killed the

wife of C.W.2. The complainant has identified the

petitioner as the person who was working earlier in the

shop of C.W.2. The CCTV footage has been collected

NC: 2026:KHC:9444

HC-KAR

wherein the petitioner is found carrying a bag.

Chargesheet material indicates prima facie case against

the petitioner for offences alleged against him. Trial is in

progress. Prosecution has already examined 15 witnesses

and it has to examine the remaining witnesses. Petitioner

is a resident of Bihar and if he is granted bail, he will flee

from justice and not available for trial.

8. Considering the above aspects, petitioner has

not made out any ground for grant of bail.

In the result, petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40 Ct.sm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter