Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Atreya Ayurvedic Medical College ... vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1361 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1361 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Atreya Ayurvedic Medical College ... vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 17 February, 2026

                                           -1-
                                                 NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB
                                                 WP No. 4622 of 2026


             HC-KAR



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                     PRESENT
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
                                           AND
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
                    WRIT PETITION NO. 4622 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)
             BETWEEN:

             1.    ATREYA AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE
                   HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE,
                   KAKKALLI ROAD, KODIGEHALLI,
                   DODDABALLAPUR TALUK,
                   BENGALURU - 561 203
                   BY ITS PRINCIPAL
                   DR. RAGHUNATH
                   AGE: 52 YEARS.

             2.    MR. GADHAVE RUSHIKESH DADABHAU,
                   AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
Digitally          S/O SRI DADABHAU BHAGUJI GADHAVE.
Signed by
REKHA R      3.    MS. GAIKWAD PRATIKSHA SATISH,
Location :
High               AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
Court of           D/O SRI SATISH NAMDEV GAIKWAD.
Karnataka
             4.    MS. MEHNAZ SHAMIM,
                   AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
                   D/O SRI MUSHRROF HUSSAIN FORAZI,

             5.    MS. NABA MARIAM,
                   AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
                   D/O SRI LIYAKATH ALI.
                           -2-
                                    NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB
                                    WP No. 4622 of 2026


HC-KAR




6.   MS. PRASAD SHIKHA DARASINGH,
     AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
     D/O SRI DARASINGH.

7.   MS. RANI KUMARI,
     AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
     D/O SRI DUDHNATH PANDIT.

8.   MR. SOUTUL HAQUE,
     AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
     S/O SRI ANUARUL HOQUE.

9.   MR. TEJAS VIRENDRA MODI,
     AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
     S/O SRI VIRENDRA MODI.

10. MS. VISHAKHA BHAMARE,
    AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
    D/O SRI NAMDEV BHAMARE,

     PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 10 ARE STUDENTS OF
     M/S. ATREYA AYURVEDIC MEDICAL
     HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE
     KAKKALLI ROAD, KODIGEHALLI,
     DODDABALLAPUR TALUK,
     BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 561 203.
                                          ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,
     4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
     BENGALURU - 560 041,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
                                 -3-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB
                                             WP No. 4622 of 2026


HC-KAR




2.  KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY,
    SAMPIGE ROAD, 18TH CROSS,
    MALLESHWARAM,
    BENGALURU - 560 012,
    REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.GIRISH KUMAR R., ADVOCATE FOR R1,
    SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO i) ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT,
ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 22/01/2026 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT -
UNIVERSITY, ANNEXURE-J INSOFAR AS IT IMPOSES A PENALTY
OF RS.75,00,000/- AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS CONDITIONS, AS
BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF
LAW      AND   ii)   DIRECT   THE     RESPONDENTS    TO   PERMIT
PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 10 TO APPEAR IN ALL EXAMINATIONS
SCHEDULED FROM 18/02/2026 ONWARDS, TO ANNOUNCE
THEIR RESULTS, AND TO ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE THE
BAMS COURSE WITHOUT INTERRUPTION, IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LAW BY ISSUING FORMAL LETTER OF APPROVAL OF
ADMISSIONS AND iii) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS.

      THIS     PETITION,      COMING    ON    FOR   PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
       and
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
                                  -4-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB
                                              WP No. 4622 of 2026


HC-KAR



                           ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

Heard Sri.Abhishek Malipatil, learned counsel for the

petitioner, Sri.Girish Kumar. R, learned counsel appearing

for respondent No.1 and Sri.N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel

appearing for the Karnataka Examination Authority ('KEA'

for short).

2. This petition has been filed seeking the

following reliefs:

"i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned order dated 22.01.2026 issued by the 1st Respondent-University, Annexure-J insofar as it imposes a penalty of Rs.75,00,000/- and other extraneous conditions, as being arbitrary, illegal and without authority of law; and ii. Direct the Respondents to permit Petitioners No.2 to 10 to appear in all examinations scheduled from 18.02.2026 onwards, to announce their results, and to allow them to continue the BAMS course without interruption, in accordance with law by issuing formal letter of approval of admissions; and iii. Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interests of justice, equity and good conscience."

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

3. As far as the prayer No. 1 is concerned, learned

counsel for the respondent No.1 has fairly stated that the

order dated 01.09.2025 of the Division Bench of this Court

in W.P.No.18100/2024, insofar as it directed imposition of

cost of Rs.75,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Lakhs only)

has been stayed by the Supreme Court by means of an

order dated 18.12.2025, passed in Special Leave Petition

(Civil) Diary No.70675/2025 and therefore, payment of

the cost would be subject to the outcome of the aforesaid

petition before the Supreme Court. The petitioner No.1

shall abide by the decision of the Supreme Court in this

regard. As far as the imposition of cost of Rs.75,00,000/-

is concerned, admittedly, petitioner Nos.2 to 10 have got

nothing to do with the same. It is only the petitioner No.1-

Institution who would be saddled with the liability of

paying the amount should the petition pending before the

Supreme Court fail.

4. Insofar as prayer No.2 is concerned, it is on

record that the petitioners had filed writ petition

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

No.14484/2023, seeking to challenge an order passed by

the respondent-University dated 23.05.2023, inter-alia to

accord admission to the petitioner Nos.1 to 10 therein. The

writ petition came to be disposed of, with a direction to

the respondent-University to extend similar benefits given

to petitioner-students in the aforesaid W.P.No.18100/2024

and connected matters without any further delay,

announce the results and permit the students to continue

in accordance with law. The petitioner Nos.2 to 10 had

obtained admission in the petitioner No.1-Institution. The

procedure adopted for admission was objected to by the

University, which was subject matter of challenge in

W.P.No.14484/2023. Petitioner Nos.2 to 10 were

permitted to continue as students, which was subject to

the final order passed in the writ petition. This fact is not

disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Pursuant to the Judgment dated 24.09.2025

passed in the aforesaid W.P.No.14484/2023, the

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

petitioners were permitted to appear in the examinations

and they are now in the second year.

6. Respondent No.1 issued a letter dated

18.10.2025 to the Registrar (Evaluation) of the

respondent No.1-University, on the subject of

announcement of results and permission for 10 students

shown in the letter to appear for ensuing BAMS

examination at the petitioner No.1-Institution for the year

2022-2023. A direction was issued to the Registrar

(Evaluation), to announce the results of the specified 10

students and to permit them to appear for the ensuing

BAMS examination admitted for the year 2022-2023.

7. It is noted that though the names of 10

students were mentioned in the letter, only 9 of the

candidates have filed this petition. One candidate, Mehdi

Hasan, whose name appears at Sl.No.3 in the list of

students of the aforesaid letter dated 18.10.2025 has

chosen not to file this writ petition, as he has discontinued

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

the Course, as per the submission of learned counsel for

the petitioners.

8. Under these circumstances, the petitioners are

aggrieved by the impugned order dated 22.01.2026, to

the extent of its directing submission of list of all the

illegally admitted students for the academic year 2022-

2023, to the KEA and in turn, the KEA must send the list

of eligible students to the respondent No.1-University.

9. As far as the direction regarding submission of

list of eligible students to the University by the KEA, after

submission of the list of students admitted illegally for the

academic year 2022-2023 by the petitioner No.1-

institution, there cannot be any cavil to the fact that the

proper procedure regarding counselling and the aspect of

eligibility is to be assessed by the KEA. It is the KEA that is

vested with the powers to undertake such an exercise in

accordance with the National Commission for Indian

System of Medicines (Minimum Standards of

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

Undergraduate Ayurveda Education) Regulations, 2022.

Moreover, in the aforesaid letter of 18.10.2025, by which

the petitioners-students were permitted to appear for the

ensuing BAMS examination admitted for the year 2022-

2023, it is mentioned in that letter as follows:

"Note: Announcement of results and Permitting the students to appear for the Next/Future Examination are subject to the approval of admission of the above students on the compliance of conditions imposed in the W.P.No.18100/2024 by this College."

10. Therefore, there is no dispute that the

respondent No.1-University had directed that the condition

imposed by this Court in the aforesaid W.P.No.18100/2024

is required to be complied with, that is to say, the

eligibility of the candidates has to be duly assessed prior

to granting approval of their admission by the concerned

Authorities.

11. Sri.N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel for the KEA in

his usual fairness has stated that the KEA will take a

decision as to the eligibility of petitioner Nos.2 to 10,

- 10 -

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

subject to the petitioner No.1 furnishing the details along

with the eligibility credentials of the students.

12. In view of the aforesaid, we direct that the

petitioner No.1-Institution shall furnish the eligibility

credentials along with all relevant documents to the KEA in

respect of petitioner Nos.2 to 10 within a week from today

that is to say on or before the closure of office hours on

24.02.2026. Thereafter, the KEA will take a decision on

the eligibility of the petitioner Nos.2 to 10 on or before

27.02.2026, and the same shall be communicated/

uploaded on KEA website as per the procedure prescribed.

13. It is made clear that the KEA will consider the

eligibility of petitioner Nos.2 to 10 only when all the

petitioners give an unequivocal and unconditional

undertaking before the KEA by means of their respective

affidavits, stating that the decision of the KEA shall be

binding on them and they will accept the same. This is

being done in view of the fact that petitioner Nos.2 to 10

- 11 -

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

who were illegally admitted, have been permitted to

continue in the course only under interim orders of this

Court passed in previous writ petitions and have been

permitted to appear in examinations only by the orders of

this Court. Such a state of affairs cannot be permitted to

continue indefinitely. This undertaking shall be furnished

within 24 hours.

14. The respondent No.1-University shall declare

the result of those students whose eligibility has been

cleared by the KEA.

15. Under the facts and circumstances, we permit

petitioner Nos.2 to 10 to appear in the examinations that

are stated to be held from tomorrow i.e., 18.02.2026 till

16.03.2026. It is made clear that if the aforesaid

undertaking is not furnished by the petitioner Nos.2 to 10

within 24 hours, they shall not be permitted to appear in

the forthcoming examinations which are commencing from

tomorrow. The counsel for the respondent - University is

- 12 -

NC: 2026:KHC:9659-DB

HC-KAR

required to communicate this order to the University as

soon as possible.

16. With the aforesaid observations, this petition

stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

Sd/-

(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter