Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yashwantha @ Gunda vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1243 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1243 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Yashwantha @ Gunda vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:8857
                                                         CRL.P No. 12577 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                               CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12577 OF 2025
                                     (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   YASHAWANTHA @ GUNDA
                           S/O KRISHNAMURTHY
                           AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
                           R/AT ANCHIHALLY VILAGE
                           HALEBEEDU HOBLI
                           BELURU TALUK, HASSAN-01

                                                                   ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI. PRATHEEP.K.C.,ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                           REP BY HASSAN RURAL POLICE STATION
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA            HASSAN DISTRICT
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                           REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
COURT OF                   HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KARNATAKA
                           BENGALURU-560001.

                      2.   GANGAMMA
                           W/O LATE SIDDAIAH
                           AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
                           R/AT YAREHALLI VILLAGE
                           KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK
                           HASSAN DISTRICT-573201

                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI.MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)
                            -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:8857
                                 CRL.P No. 12577 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN SPL.C.180/2025 (CRIME NO.73/2025), PENDING ON
THE FILE OF HONBLE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND FTSC-1 AT HASSAN, FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 137(2), 329(4), 64 AND 249
BNS, SECTION 4 OF POCSO ACT 2012, BY HASSAN RURAL
POLICE.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Spl. C No.180/2025 (Crime No.73/2025 of

Hassan Rural Police Station) pending on the file of the

learned Additional District Sessions Judge and FTSC-1,

Hassan registered for offences punishable under Sections

137(2), 329(4), 64 and 249 of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita,

2023 and Section 4 of Protection of Children From Sexual

Offences Act, 2012.

NC: 2026:KHC:8857

HC-KAR

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and

learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for

respondent/State.

3. In spite of service of notice, respondent

remained absent and unrepresented.

4. The learned counsel for petitioner would

contend that the statement of the victim has been

recorded under Section 183 of BNSS wherein she has not

alleged any sexual assault by the petitioner on her. The

victim girl has been examined by the doctor and before

the doctor, she has stated that she is in love affair with

the petitioner since last one and a half year. The victim girl

is aged 17 years and she is aware of consequences of her

acts. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.04.2025.

As charge sheet is filed, he is not required for further

custodial interrogation. There are no criminal antecedents

of the petitioner. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC:8857

HC-KAR

5. Per contra, the learned Additional State Public

Prosecutor for respondent/State would contend that the

victim girl has specifically stated in her statement recorded

under Section 183 of BNSS, that the petitioner has forcibly

took her on the bike, snatched her phone, did not stop the

bike and took her to Halebeedu to the house of his friend,

Harish. It is contended that the victim girl has been

tutored by the Advocate, to whom the petitioner had sent

her through his friend, and that she has been tutored to

give a statement in favour of the petitioner. The victim

girl is aged 17 years. The offence alleged against the

petitioner is a heinous offence. There is a prima facie case

against the petitioner for offences alleged against him.

With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

6. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court

has perused the charge sheet and other materials placed

on record.

NC: 2026:KHC:8857

HC-KAR

7. As per the charge sheet, the case of the

prosecution is that on 14.03.2025, the petitioner induced

the victim girl on the promise of marrying her, kidnapped

her on his motorcycle, and took her to the house of

accused Nos.2 and 3, where she was kept in wrongful

confinement. It is further alleged that on 19.03.2025, the

petitioner forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her.

The statement of the victim girl has been recorded under

Section 183 of the BNSS, wherein she has not alleged any

sexual intercourse on her by the petitioner. The victim girl

has been examined by the doctor, and before the doctor,

the victim girl has given history wherein she has stated

that, she is having love affair with the petitioner since last

one and a half years, and she has not alleged any sexual

intercourse by the petitioner. The victim girl is aged 17

years and she is of the age of understanding the

consequences of her acts. The petitioner is aged 21 years.

As charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for

NC: 2026:KHC:8857

HC-KAR

further custodial interrogation. There are no criminal

antecedents of the petitioner.

8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions.

In the result, the following:

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner is granted bail in Special Case

No. 180 of 2025 under Record Spl. C No.180/2025 (Crime

No.73/2025 of Hassan Rural Police Station) pending on the

file of the learned Additional District Sessions Judge and

FTSC-1, Hassan registered for offences punishable under

Sections 137(2), 329(4), 64 and 249 of Bharatiya Nyay

Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of Protection of Children From

Sexual Offences Act, 2012 subject to following conditions.

a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

NC: 2026:KHC:8857

HC-KAR

b) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

c) The petitioner shall attend the Trial Court on all dates hearing unless exempted and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter