Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shiva Kallura vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1136 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1136 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shiva Kallura vs State Of Karnataka on 11 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:8228
                                                        CRL.P No. 16487 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16487 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                            483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      SHIVA KALLURA
                      S/O SHANKARA
                      AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
                      R/AT CHANDANAGIRI HAADI
                      NERALAKUPPE POST
                      HANAGODU HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK
                      MYSURU DIST.-571 105
                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. PRITHVI RAJ B.N, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      BY RANGE FOREST OFFICER
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       KACHUVEENAHALLI RANGE
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        WILDLIFE RANGE, HUNSUR TALUK
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             MYSURU DIST.-571 118
                      REP. BY S.P.P.
                      KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
                      BANGALORE-560 001
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C
                      (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE
                      THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NUMBER FOC NO.04/2025-
                      26    REGISTERED     BY    RANGE    FOREST     OFFICER
                      KACHUVEENAHALLI RANGE HUNSUR FOR THE OFFENCES
                              -2-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC:8228
                                     CRL.P No. 16487 of 2025


HC-KAR




PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 62, 84, 85, 86, 87 OF
KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 R/W RULE 154, 144, 165 OF
KARNATAKA FOREST RULES 1969, WHICH IS PENDING TRIAL
BEFORE VIII ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT
MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section

483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in FOC No.4/2025-26

registered by the Range Forest Officer, Wildlife Range,

Hunsur, registered for offences punishable under Sections

62, 84, 85, 86, 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 read

with Rules 154, 144, 165 of Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional SPP for the respondent -State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would

contend that the accused No.2 who is similarly placed to

that of this petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail by

this Court in Criminal Petition No.15901/2025 by order

NC: 2026:KHC:8228

HC-KAR

dated 06.01.2025. The petitioner is in judicial custody

since 28.09.2025 and as the charge sheet is filed, he is

not required for further custodial interrogation. Offences

alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either

with death or imprisonment for life. The maximum

sentence that can be imposed imprisonment which may

extend upto 10 years. There are no criminal antecedents

of the petitioner. With this, he prays to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned Additional SPP for the

respondent -State would contend that this petitioner has

been caught red handed in the midnight while he was

cutting the sandalwood trees. The offence alleged against

the petitioner is provided with minimum sentence of 05

years imprisonment, which may extend upto 10 years and

fine of Rs.50,000/-. If the petitioner is granted bail, there

are chances of him committing similar offence. With this,

he prayed to reject the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC:8228

HC-KAR

5. Having heard learned counsels, the Court has

perused FIR, complaint, charge sheet and other materials

placed on record.

6. The charge sheet indicates that forest officials

found three persons involved in cutting of sandalwood tree

and when they chased, two persons were caught and one

person ran away. The petitioner who was caught disclosed

the name of the person who ran away and he is accused

No.2. The forest officials have seized 24.5 kg of

sandalwood root and stem and 6.6 kg of sandalwood billet

from the spot along with other articles used for cutting the

tree. Now, investigation is over and charge sheet has been

filed. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 28.09.2025

and as the charge sheet is filed, he is not required for

further custodial interrogation. The offences alleged

against the petitioner are not punishable either with death

or imprisonment for life. The maximum sentence that can

be imposed is imprisonment which may extend upto 10

years. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

NC: 2026:KHC:8228

HC-KAR

Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has made

out case for grant of bail with conditions.

7. In the result, the following

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner -accused No.1 is granted bail in

FOC No.4/2025-26 registered by the Range

Forest Officer, Wildlife Range, Hunsur, subject

to following conditions:

a) The petitioner -accused No.1 shall execute a

bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with

one surety for like sum to the satisfaction of

the jurisdictional Court.

b) The petitioner -accused No.1 shall not

tamper the prosecution witnesses either

directly or indirectly.

NC: 2026:KHC:8228

HC-KAR

c) The petitioner -accused No.1 shall attend the

trial Court on all dates of hearing unless

exempted and cooperate for speedy disposal

of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter