Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Management Of Nwkrtc vs Sri Hanumantappa S/O. Kenchappa ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 8838 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8838 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2025

Karnataka High Court

The Management Of Nwkrtc vs Sri Hanumantappa S/O. Kenchappa ... on 25 September, 2025

Author: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
Bench: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
                                              -1-
                                                      NC: 2025:KHC-D:13266-DB
                                                      WA No. 100616 of 2025


                 HC-KAR




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

                        DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
                                         PRESENT

                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                                              AND
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL


                          WRIT APPEAL NO. 100616 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC)

                 BETWEEN:

                 THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC,
                 HUBBALLI DIVISION,
                 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
                 4TH FLOOR, CBT HUBBALLI-580020.
                                                                -    APPELLANT
                 (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)

                 AND:

                 SRI. HANUMANTAPPA S/O. KENCHAPPA GUDIMANI,
                 AGE: 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED TRAFFIC
                 CONTROLLER, KADAPATTI ROAD, KUNDGOL,
                 TALUK: KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581113.
Digitally
signed by                                                   -       RESPONDENT
VINAYAKA B V
Location: High
Court of
                 (BY SRI. RAVI HEDGE, ADVOCATE)
Karnataka,
Dharwad
Bench

                      THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
                 ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.07.2024
                 WP NO.103130/2024 (S-KSRTC), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
                 EQUITY AND ETC.

                      THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
                 JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER

                 CORAM:     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                            AND
                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                                  -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC-D:13266-DB
                                           WA No. 100616 of 2025


HC-KAR




                       ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL)

The 'Joint Memo of Settlement' filed by the parties

before the Mediation Centre, High Court of Karnataka,

Dharwad Bench, is placed before the Court. Terms of the

'Joint Memo of Settlement' reads as under:

"1. The Appellant/Corporation in the aforementioned Writ appeal is calling in question the order passed by the learned Single Judge directing the Appellant/Corporation to pay interest @ 9% p.a on the belated payment towards Leave Encashment benefits within 6 weeks failing which the rate of interest would be increased to 12%.

2. During pendency of the above writ appeals parties have settled the issue involved in the present writ appeal in following terms and condition in order put an end to the litigation. a. The Management, though disputing the order, has agreed to pay interest at 7% per annum on the belated payment of leave encashment benefits for the period of delay, within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the award, which the Respondent has accepted.

b. It is further agreed that in the event of failure to pay the said interest within 8 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, the Petitioner-Corporation shall pay interest at 9% per annum on the belated payment.

c. If the Management fails to comply with the aforesaid conditions, the respondent is at liberty to initiate appropriate

NC: 2025:KHC-D:13266-DB

HC-KAR

proceedings before the competent Court of law for execution of this settlement.

d. The above settlement and the terms agreed upon are in accordance with law, do not offend any provision of law, and constitute a fair and reasonable settlement in the interest of both parties."

We have perused the 'Joint Memo of Settlement'

signed by the counsels appearing for the parties. The

settlement arrived at is as per law and on their own volition.

Considering the same, 'Joint Memo of Settlement' is

accepted. Writ Appeal is disposed of in terms of the 'Joint

Memo of Settlement'.

Sd/-

(S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE

BVV /CT-AN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter