Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8357 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:36423
RFA No. 414 of 2008
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 414 OF 2008 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT ANUSUYAMMA
SINCE DEAD REP BY HER LR'S
2. SRI M SATYANARAYANA
S/O LATE D MOHANRAM
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
3. SRI M JAYAKUMAR
SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LR'S
3(A) SMT MEEN KUMARI
W/OLATE SRI M JAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
Digitally signed
by 3(B) SMT LAKSHMI
HEMALATHA A D/O LAE SRI M JAYAKUMAR
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 32 YEAR
COURTOF
KARNATAKA
3(C) SMT HARI PRIYA
S/O LAE SRI M JAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
3(D) SRI YUGNDHAR
S/O LATE SRI M JAYAKUMAR
ALL RESIDING AT 3RD CRSS SHIVAJI ROAD
NEW KORACHARAPALYA 'A' STREET
BLACKPALLY, CIVIL STATION, BANGALORE-560051.
...APPELLANTS
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:36423
RFA No. 414 of 2008
HC-KAR
(BY SRI.M SATYANARAYANA AND OTHERS - NO REPRESENTATION)
AND:
1. SMT PARVATHAMMA
W/O LATE M MANOHAR
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
2. M SRINATH
S/O LATE M MANOHAR
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
3. M THULASI
D/O LATE M MANOHAR
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R1 TO R3 AE R/AT QUARTERS NO 2
BLOCK 11 BLACKPALLY POLICE QUARTERS
BROADWAY ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR
BANGALORE 51.
4. SMT M MOHAN A
D/O LATE M MANOHAR
W/O JOHN PAUL
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT NO 4, 3 CROSS, NK PALYA
SHIVAJINAGAR, BALAPPA GARDEN
BANGALORE-51.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. L NARASIMHAMURTHY, AND SRI.S A SUDHINDRA,
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:29.11.2007 PASSED IN
OS.NO.8181/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, CCH.NO.2, PARTLY DECREEING THE
SUIT FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE
PROFITS, HOLDING THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE TOGETHER ENTITLED
TO 1/4TH SHARE AND ITS SEPARATE POSSESSION IN THE SUIT
SCHEDULE PROPERTIES.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:36423
RFA No. 414 of 2008
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court, on 15.02.2023, permitted the learned
counsel for the appellants to retire from the case and
directed the office to show the name of the appellants in
the cause list.
2. Today, when the matter is called, neither the
appellants are present nor engaged any counsel.
3. It appears that the appellants are not interested in
prosecuting this appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!