Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8004 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:34556-DB
WPHC No. 55 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
WPHC NO. 55 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
MRS. NETRA SRIKANTH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
D/O. MR. KANNANKOTE SRIKANTH,
PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT: 2781,
ELMWOOD AVE,
ROCHESTER,
NEW YORK -14618.
PASSPORT NO: A10471794
EMAIL: [email protected]
...PETITIONER
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S (BY SMT. HIRANMAYI RAJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR
Location: HIGH SRI. GAURAV SINGH GAUR, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH HOME DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
2ND FLOOR,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU- 560 001.
REP. BY SECRETARY
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:34556-DB
WPHC No. 55 of 2025
HC-KAR
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
BENGALURU CITY
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, 2,
ALI ASKER RD,
VASANTH NAGAR,
BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA 560 001.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
2H4V+6FR,
VP DEENADAYALU NAIDU ROAD,
JAYAMAHAL,
BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA 560 046.
4. MR. RAGHAVA K. KALYANARAMAN,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
SON OF MR. KALYANARAMAN DURGADAS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 64/1,
1ST MAIN, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION,
BANGALORE 560 046.
PASSPORT NO: 567653736
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE NO. +91 9740125028
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIYAPPA, SPP-I ALONG WITH
SRI. THEJESH P, HCGP FOR R1-R3,
SRI. AZHAR MEER, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
WRIT/DIRECTION/ORDER(S) TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4, I.E.
THE FATHER HEREIN, TO FORTHWITH PRODUCE THE MINOR
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:34556-DB
WPHC No. 55 of 2025
HC-KAR
CHILD, NAMELY MASTER RUDRA RAGHAVA, THE ELDEST CHILD
OF THE PETITIONER, BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner.
2. Having considered the contentions advanced in this
writ petition and in view of the specific averments in the writ
petition, it is clear that the disputes between the parties i.e.,
the writ petitioner and respondent No.4 is with regard to
custody of a children, which has to be agitated in appropriate
proceedings before the Family Court.
3. In view of the pleadings on record in this case, we
are not satisfied that there is any element of illegal detention of
the minor child so as to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution.
NC: 2025:KHC:34556-DB
HC-KAR
4. The writ petition fails and the same is accordingly
dismissed.
All the contentions of the parties are left open to be
agitated in the appropriate proceedings.
SD/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!