Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9565 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
WP No. 30360 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 30360 OF 2024 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
1. MARLABS INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT 1956
HAVING OFFICE AT PRIMECO UNION CITY,
WING-1, BLOCK -B, 7TH FLOOR
SADARAMANGALA INDUSTRIAL AREA
KRISHNARAJAPURAM
BANGALORE - 560 067
REPRESENTED BY ITS
4 DIRECTOR
MR. MANISH SINGHVI
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
AND:
by
SHARADAVANI
B 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Location: High
Court of CIRCLE 4(1)(1)-BANGALORE
Karnataka BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD
KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU 560 095
2. CHIEF COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX-1
BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU 560 095
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
WP No. 30360 of 2024
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO-QUASH THE
ORDER DTD 31.08.2024 BEARING NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2024-
25/1068224325(1) (ANNEXURE-G) PASSED BY THE R-1 UNDER
SEC 148A(d) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2018-19QUASH OF THE
NOTICE DTD 31.08.2024 BEARING NO. ITBA/AST/S/148-
1/2024-25/1068226340(1) (ANNEXURE-H) PASSED BY THE R-1
UNDER SEC 148 OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2018-19 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this Petition, petitioner seeks the following
reliefs:
"The Petitioner, therefore, prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction:
a) Quashing the order dated 31.08.2024 bearing по. G) (Annexure ITBA/AST/F/148A/2024-25/1068224325(1) passed by the 1st Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Act for the assessment year 2018-19;
b) Quashing of the notice dated 31.08.2024 bearing no. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2024-25/1068226340(1) (Annexure H) passed by the 1st Respondent under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2018-19;
c) pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interests of justice and equity."
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
HC-KAR
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the respondents and perused the
material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various
contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and
referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the
petitioner invited my attention to the order of a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra
Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected
matters - dated 28.08.2025, in order to contend that
the present petition deserves to be allowed and disposed
of in terms of the said order.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents
submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the
same is liable to be dismissed.
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
HC-KAR
5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for
the petitioner the present petition is directly and squarely
covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar
Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -
W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated
28.08.2025, the operative portion of which reads as
under:
"13. I, therefore, pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151-A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in these cases would stand quashed.
(ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive all these petitions in the event the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the pending before it.
(iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petitions are allowed.
(iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of these petitions would become necessary."
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
HC-KAR
6. The aforesaid order is applicable to the facts
and circumstances of the instant case and consequently,
the present petition also deserves to be disposed of in
terms of the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court
in Ramachandra Reddy's case (supra).
7. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is allowed and disposed of in terms of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -
W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters
- dated 28.08.2025.
(ii) The impugned show cause notices and consequential orders, notices etc., at Annexures- G and H dated 31.08.2024 and 31.08.2024 are respectively are hereby quashed.
(iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents
- Revenue to seek revival of this petition, subsequent to disposal of the matters pending before the Apex Court and all rival contentions
NC: 2025:KHC:43301
HC-KAR
between the parties in this regard are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BSV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!