Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nandita Anilkant Mehta vs Income Tax Officer
2025 Latest Caselaw 9556 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9556 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Nandita Anilkant Mehta vs Income Tax Officer on 29 October, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                               -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC:43296
                                                         WP No. 32231 of 2025


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

                                             BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 32231 OF 2025 (T-IT)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    NANDITA ANILKANT MEHTA
                         D/O ANIKANT HANILAL LMEHTA
                         AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
                         RESIDING AT
                         FLAT NO. 402B, SRINIVASA CLASSIC,
                         SARJAPUR MAIN ROAD,
                          NEXT TO FIRE STATION,
                         KAIKONDARAHALLI,
                         BANGALORRE 560 035
                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. GIRIJA G P.,ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   1.    INCOME TAX OFFICER
Digitally signed         WARD5(3)(3) BANGALORE
by
SHARADAVANI              3RD FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,
B                        80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
Location: High
Court of                 BANGALORE - 560 095
Karnataka

                   2.    ASSESSMENT UNIT
                         NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
                         INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
                         MINISTRY OF FINANCE
                         2ND FLOOR, E RAMP,
                         JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM
                         NEW DELHI - 110 003
                         REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER
                                -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC:43296
                                          WP No. 32231 of 2025


HC-KAR




3.  PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
    BANGALORE - 3
    5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
    80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK
    KORAMANGALA
    BANGALORE - 560 095
                                       ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. TIRUMALESH,ADVOCATE)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT DATED 30.03.2024
BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2023-24/1063711145(1)
(ANNEXURE A) ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 AND ETC.,

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                         ORAL ORDER

In this Petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"Wherefore, the Petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction:

i)Quashing the Notice under section 148 of the Act dated 30.03.2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2023-

24/1063711145(1) (Annexure A) ISSUED by the 1 Respondent for the assessment year 2020-21;

ii) Quashing the Approval under section 151 of the Act dated 30.03.2024 DIN bearing ITBA/AST/S/118/2023- 24/1063708075(1) No. (Annexure A1) issued by the 3rd Respondent for the assessment year 2020-21;

iii) Quashing the Assessment Order under 147 read with section 1448 of the Act dated 26.12.2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2024-25/1071599058(1) (Annexure

NC: 2025:KHC:43296

HC-KAR

C) passed by the 2nd Respondent for the assessment year 2020-21;

iv) Quashing the Order u/s 270A of the Act dated 11.06.2025 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2025- 26/1076926345(1) (Annexure D) issued by the 2nd Respondent for the assessment year 2020-21;

v) Quashing the Notice of Demand under section 156 of the Act dated bearing 11.06.2025 ITBA/PNL/S/156/2025-26/1076920674(1) DIN No. (Annexure D1) issued by the 2nd Respondent for the assessment year 2020-21;

vi) Pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the respondents and perused the

material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various

contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and

referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the

petitioner invited my attention to the order of a Co-

ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra

Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected

matters - dated 28.08.2025, in order to contend that

NC: 2025:KHC:43296

HC-KAR

the present petition deserves to be allowed and disposed

of in terms of the said order.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents

submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the

same is liable to be dismissed.

5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for

the petitioner the present petition is directly and squarely

covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar

Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -

W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated

28.08.2025, the operative portion of which reads as

under:

"13. I, therefore, pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151-A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in these cases would stand quashed.

(ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive all these petitions in the event the Apex

NC: 2025:KHC:43296

HC-KAR

Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the pending before it.

(iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petitions are allowed.

(iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of these petitions would become necessary."

6. The aforesaid order is applicable to the facts

and circumstances of the instant case and consequently,

the present petition also deserves to be disposed of in

terms of the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court

in Ramachandra Reddy's case (supra).

7. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The petition is allowed and disposed of in terms of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -

W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters

- dated 28.08.2025.

(ii) The impugned show cause notices and consequential orders, notices etc., at Annexures- A, A1, C, D, and D1 dated 30.03.2024,

NC: 2025:KHC:43296

HC-KAR

30.03.2024, 26.12.2024, 11.06.2025 and 11.06.2025 respectively are hereby quashed.

(iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents - Revenue to seek revival of this petition, subsequent to disposal of the matters pending before the Apex Court and all rival contentions between the parties in this regard are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

BSV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter