Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9483 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.908 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
MORGAN SECURITIES AND
CREDITS PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
HAVING OFFICE AT
53, FRIENDS COLONY (EAST)
NEW DELHI
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. M.K. JAIN
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. ABHISHEK PURI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BPL LIMITED
DYNAMIC HOUSE No.64
CHURCH GATE
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MR. AJIT GOPAL NAMBIAR
2. MR. AJIT GOPAL NAMBIAR
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
OF BPL LIMITED
ALSO CHAIRMAN AND DIRECTOR
OF BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
10/3, CUNNINGHAM CRESCENT ROAD
-
2
CUNNINGHAM ROAD CROSS
BENGALURU-560 001
ALSO AT: DYNAMIC HOUSE No.64
CHURCH GATE
BENGALURU-560 001
3. MS. ANJU CHANDRASEKHAR
DIRECTOR OF BPL LIMITED
ALSO DIRECTOR OF BPL MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
408, 2ND A CROSS, 8TH MAIN
3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU SOUTH
BENGALURU-560 034
ALSO AT: DYNAMIC HOUSE No.64
CHURCH GATE
BENGALURU-560 001
4. BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
11TH KM, ARAKERE
BANNERGHATTA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 076
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
SUNIL KHURANA
5. SUNIL KHURANA
MANAGING DIRECTOR
BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
11TH KM, ARAKERE
BANNERGHATTA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 076
ALSO AT: 509,
A4 THUNGABHADRA N.G.V.
KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 047
6. AJAY JINDAL
CFO
OF BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
11TH KM, ARAKERE
BANNERGHATTA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 076
-
3
7. RIDHI CHOUDHARY
NOMINEE DIRECTOR
BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
11TH KM, ARAKERE
BANNERGHATTA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 076
ALSO AT: 4203, LODHA PRIMERO
N.M. JOSHI MARG
MAHALAKSHMI, MUMBAI-400 013
8. SHASHANK
NOMINEE DIRECTOR
BPL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
1701, B WING, ELISIUM LODHA
NEW CUFFE PARADE, WADALA
MUMBAI-400 037
ACCUSED
(BY SRI. PERIKAL K. ARJUN, ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A3;
SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. AJAY J. NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE FOR A4 TO A6;
SRI. MOAMMED SHAMEER, ADVOCATE FOR A7 & A8)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 12(b), 10 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT,
WHERE IN HE PRAYS TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURTS
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND PUNISH THEM
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,
1971 FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2020 PASSED
BY THE CITY CIVIL COURT IN EX. PETITION No.4621/2018 AND
ETC.
THIS CCC HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT ON 16.10.2025 AND COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, ANU SIVARAMAN
J., PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
-
4
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
This Contempt of Court Case is filed alleging non-
compliance of the directions issued by the XXXV Additional
City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-36)
('Executing Court' for short) in Execution Petition
No.4621/2018 dated 20.02.2020. There is a further prayer
that accused No.1 to 3 be directed to purge the contempt by
depositing the dividends received from accused No.4 in
willful disregard of the order dated 20.02.2020.
2. We have heard Shri. Abhishek Puri, learned
counsel appearing for the complainant, Shri. Dhyan
Chinnappa, learned senior counsel as instructed by Shri.
Ajay J Nandalike, learned Advocate appearing for accused
persons No.4 to 6, Shri. Perikal K. Arjun learned counsel
appearing for accused persons No.1 to 3 and Shri.
Mohammed Shameer, learned counsel appearing for accused
persons No. 7 and 8.
-
3. The prayer in I.A.No.3 was (a) to attach
Rs.2,10,50,000/- shares of M/s. BPL Medical Technologies
Private Limited held by M/s. BPL Limited and to prohibit the
Judgment Debtor - M/s. BPL Limited from transferring the
shares or receiving any dividends thereon. (b) direct the
original title deeds deposited with sole arbitrator in respect
of the properties detailed in paragraph No.3 of the present
application be deposited with this Court and (c) restrain the
judgment debtor/accused No.1 from selling, alienating,
encumbering any of their movable and immovable assets
located in Bengaluru.
4. The Executing Court allowed I.A.No.3 and had
answered the prayers in favour of the decree holder -
Morgan Securities and Credits Private Limited in the
affirmative.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing
for the complainant that the directions have not been
complied with and that dividend amounting to
Rs.10,31,45,000/- for the financial year 2021-2022 and
-
Rs.8,42,00,000/- for the financial year 2022-2023 have
been paid by accused No.4 to accused No.1 in violation of
the directions issued by the Executing Court in Execution
Petition No.4621/2018 vide order dated 20.02.2020.
6. Affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondent
No.6 and respondents No.4 and 5, dated 05.08.2025. It is
submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for
respondents/accused No.4 to 6 that the allegation of the
complainant is, despite the order, two interim dividends
totaling Rs.10,31,00,000/- were declared and paid by
respondent No.4 to respondent No.1 in the financial year
2021-2022 and a sum of Rs.8,42,00,000/- for the financial
year 2022-2023.
7. It is further submitted that an amount of
Rs.27,88,00,000/- has been deposited by accused No.1
before the Executing Court pursuant to an order dated
27.06.2025 in I.A.No.19. It is further stated at paragraph
No.7 of the Memo seeking Closure of Proceedings, which
reads as follows:-
-
"7. Pursuant to the above order, on 08.09.2025 the Complainant filed an application in the SLP seeking
(i) vacating of the interim order of stay granted in the SLP; or in the alternative (ii) deposit of Rs.96 Crores by the Accused No. 1 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. A copy of the application dated 08.09.2025 (without annexures) filed by the Complainant in the SLP is produced herewith as Annexure R-4. It is pertinent to note that as per the said application, Rs.27.88 Crores out of the said Rs.96 Crores sought is with regard to the dividends received by the Accused No.1 from the Accused No.4, which is also the relief in the present complaint and IA No.19."
8. As such, it can be concluded that as on date, the Complainant has agitated a claim for Rs.27.88 Crores before 3 different fora being this Hon'ble Court in the present complaint, before the Ld. Executing Court in I.A.No.19 and even before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of application dated 08.09.2025 in the SLP."
8. It is further submitted that a sum of
Rs.96,00,00,000/- has been deposited by accused No.1,
without prejudice to its contentions on merits, before the
Registry of the Apex Court. The copies of demand drafts are
also placed on record. It is submitted that since the
disputed amounts are already in deposit, there is no further
cause to continue these proceedings.
-
9. The learned counsel appearing for the
complainant, however, submits that, the deposit of the
amounts as stated by the accused does not purge the
contempt and that the entire amounts, drawn in violation of
the order have to be re-deposited. It is therefore contended
that the proceedings should be continued. However, having
considered the contentions advanced and in view of the
submission made that an amount of Rs.27,88,00,000/- has
been deposited by accused before the Executing Court and
an amount of Rs.96,00,00,000/- has been deposited before
the Apex Court pursuant to the orders in the SLP, we are of
the opinion that, this Contempt of Court Case need not be
proceeded with further.
10. The Contempt of Court is accordingly closed,
without prejudice to the contentions of the parties and their
rights to seek appropriate orders in the pending
proceedings.
-
All pending interlocutory applications shall stand dismissed.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/-
(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
cp*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!